chore(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 4.35.4 to 4.36.0

Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.35.4 to 4.36.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e...7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github/codeql-action dependency-version: 4.36.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
feat(compliance): add DORA framework for AWS (#11131 )
2026-06-09 21:04:53 +00:00 · 2026-06-03 11:57:46 +00:00 · 2026-06-03 11:43:55 +02:00 · 2026-06-02 16:10:13 +01:00 · 2026-06-02 14:00:17 +02:00 · 2026-06-02 13:19:21 +02:00
491 changed files with 25132 additions and 41086 deletions
@@ -11,7 +11,14 @@ envs = "wt step copy-ignored"
 [[pre-start]]
 deps = "uv sync"

-# Block 3: reminder - last visible output before `wt switch` returns.
+# Block 3: prepare pnpm via corepack.
+[[pre-start]]
+corepack-enable = "corepack enable"
+
+[[pre-start]]
+corepack-install = "cd ui && corepack install"
+
+# Block 4: reminder - last visible output before `wt switch` returns.
 # Hooks can't mutate the parent shell, so venv activation is manual.
 [[pre-start]]
 reminder = "echo '>> Reminder: activate the venv in this shell with: source .venv/bin/activate'"
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ SENTRY_RELEASE=local
 NEXT_PUBLIC_SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT=${SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT}

 #### Prowler release version ####
-NEXT_PUBLIC_PROWLER_RELEASE_VERSION=v5.29.0
+NEXT_PUBLIC_PROWLER_RELEASE_VERSION=v5.30.0

 # Social login credentials
 SOCIAL_GOOGLE_OAUTH_CALLBACK_URL="${AUTH_URL}/api/auth/callback/google"
@@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ jobs:
          persist-credentials: false

      - name: Initialize CodeQL
-        uses: github/codeql-action/init@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/init@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
          config-file: ./.github/codeql/api-codeql-config.yml

      - name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
-        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          category: '/language:${{ matrix.language }}'
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+name: 'Docs: Markdown Lint'
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - 'master'
+      - 'v5.*'
+  pull_request:
+    branches:
+      - 'master'
+      - 'v5.*'
+
+concurrency:
+  group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
+permissions: {}
+
+jobs:
+  markdown-lint:
+    if: github.repository == 'prowler-cloud/prowler'
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 10
+    permissions:
+      contents: read
+
+    steps:
+      - name: Harden Runner
+        uses: step-security/harden-runner@fa2e9d605c4eeb9fcad4c99c224cee0c6c7f3594 # v2.16.0
+        with:
+          egress-policy: block
+          allowed-endpoints: >
+            api.github.com:443
+            github.com:443
+            registry.npmjs.org:443
+            release-assets.githubusercontent.com:443
+
+      - name: Checkout repository
+        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+
+      - name: Setup Node.js
+        uses: actions/setup-node@49933ea5288caeca8642d1e84afbd3f7d6820020 # v4.4.0
+        with:
+          node-version-file: ui/.nvmrc
+
+      - name: Setup pnpm
+        uses: pnpm/action-setup@fc06bc1257f339d1d5d8b3a19a8cae5388b55320 # v5.0.0
+        with:
+          package_json_file: ui/package.json
+          run_install: false
+
+      - name: Run markdownlint
+        # Pin must match .pre-commit-config.yaml so prek and CI behave identically.
+        # pnpm dlx doesn't accept --ignore-scripts as a flag; the env var
+        # disables postinstall scripts on transitives the same way.
+        env:
+          pnpm_config_ignore_scripts: 'true'
+        run: pnpm dlx markdownlint-cli@0.45.0 '**/*.md'
@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ jobs:
          persist-credentials: false

      - name: Initialize CodeQL
-        uses: github/codeql-action/init@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/init@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
          config-file: ./.github/codeql/sdk-codeql-config.yml

      - name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
-        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          category: '/language:${{ matrix.language }}'
@@ -541,6 +541,54 @@ jobs:
          flags: prowler-py${{ matrix.python-version }}-vercel
          files: ./vercel_coverage.xml

+      # Scaleway Provider
+      - name: Check if Scaleway files changed
+        if: steps.check-changes.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        id: changed-scaleway
+        uses: tj-actions/changed-files@9426d40962ed5378910ee2e21d5f8c6fcbf2dd96 # v47.0.6
+        with:
+          files: |
+            ./prowler/**/scaleway/**
+            ./tests/**/scaleway/**
+            ./uv.lock
+
+      - name: Run Scaleway tests
+        if: steps.changed-scaleway.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        run: uv run pytest -n auto --cov=./prowler/providers/scaleway --cov-report=xml:scaleway_coverage.xml tests/providers/scaleway
+
+      - name: Upload Scaleway coverage to Codecov
+        if: steps.changed-scaleway.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        uses: codecov/codecov-action@671740ac38dd9b0130fbe1cec585b89eea48d3de # v5.5.2
+        env:
+          CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
+        with:
+          flags: prowler-py${{ matrix.python-version }}-scaleway
+          files: ./scaleway_coverage.xml
+
+      # StackIT Provider
+      - name: Check if StackIT files changed
+        if: steps.check-changes.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        id: changed-stackit
+        uses: tj-actions/changed-files@9426d40962ed5378910ee2e21d5f8c6fcbf2dd96 # v47.0.6
+        with:
+          files: |
+            ./prowler/**/stackit/**
+            ./tests/**/stackit/**
+            ./uv.lock
+
+      - name: Run StackIT tests
+        if: steps.changed-stackit.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        run: uv run pytest -n auto --cov=./prowler/providers/stackit --cov-report=xml:stackit_coverage.xml tests/providers/stackit
+
+      - name: Upload StackIT coverage to Codecov
+        if: steps.changed-stackit.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
+        uses: codecov/codecov-action@671740ac38dd9b0130fbe1cec585b89eea48d3de # v5.5.2
+        env:
+          CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
+        with:
+          flags: prowler-py${{ matrix.python-version }}-stackit
+          files: ./stackit_coverage.xml
+
      # Lib
      - name: Check if Lib files changed
        if: steps.check-changes.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
@@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ jobs:
          persist-credentials: false

      - name: Initialize CodeQL
-        uses: github/codeql-action/init@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/init@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
          config-file: ./.github/codeql/ui-codeql-config.yml

      - name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
-        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+        uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
        with:
          category: '/language:${{ matrix.language }}'
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ jobs:
      - name: Setup Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@53b83947a5a98c8d113130e565377fae1a50d02f # v6.3.0
        with:
-          node-version: '24.13.0'
+          node-version-file: 'ui/.nvmrc'

      - name: Setup pnpm
        uses: pnpm/action-setup@fc06bc1257f339d1d5d8b3a19a8cae5388b55320 # v5.0.0
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ concurrency:

 env:
  UI_WORKING_DIR: ./ui
-  NODE_VERSION: "24.13.0"

 permissions: {}

@@ -93,11 +92,11 @@ jobs:
            ui/vitest.config.ts
            ui/vitest.setup.ts

-      - name: Setup Node.js ${{ env.NODE_VERSION }}
+      - name: Setup Node.js
        if: steps.check-changes.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
        uses: actions/setup-node@53b83947a5a98c8d113130e565377fae1a50d02f # v6.3.0
        with:
-          node-version: ${{ env.NODE_VERSION }}
+          node-version-file: 'ui/.nvmrc'

      - name: Setup pnpm
        if: steps.check-changes.outputs.any_changed == 'true'
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+{
+  "extends": "markdownlint/style/prettier",
+  "first-line-h1": false,
+  "no-duplicate-heading": {
+    "siblings_only": true
+  },
+  "no-inline-html": false,
+  "line-length": false,
+  "no-bare-urls": false
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+node_modules/
+ui/node_modules/
+.git/
+.venv/
+**/.venv/
+dist/
+build/
+htmlcov/
+.next/
+ui/.next/
+ui/out/
+contrib/
+
+# Auto-generated content (keepachangelog format legitimately repeats section headings).
+# Revisit with the team — see beads task on markdownlint rule triage.
+**/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -133,6 +133,13 @@ repos:
        pass_filenames: false
        priority: 50

+  ## MARKDOWN
+  - repo: https://github.com/igorshubovych/markdownlint-cli
+    rev: v0.45.0
+    hooks:
+      - id: markdownlint
+        priority: 30
+
  ## CONTAINERS
  - repo: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint
    rev: v2.14.0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Use these skills for detailed patterns on-demand:

 ### Generic Skills (Any Project)
+
 | Skill | Description | URL |
 |-------|-------------|-----|
 | `typescript` | Const types, flat interfaces, utility types | [SKILL.md](skills/typescript/SKILL.md) |
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ Use these skills for detailed patterns on-demand:
 | `tdd` | Test-Driven Development workflow | [SKILL.md](skills/tdd/SKILL.md) |

 ### Prowler-Specific Skills
+
 | Skill | Description | URL |
 |-------|-------------|-----|
 | `prowler` | Project overview, component navigation | [SKILL.md](skills/prowler/SKILL.md) |
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Do you want to learn on how to...
+# Do you want to learn on how to

 - [Contribute with your code or fixes to Prowler](https://docs.prowler.com/developer-guide/introduction)
 - [Create a new provider](https://docs.prowler.com/developer-guide/provider)
@@ -32,5 +32,6 @@ Provider-specific developer notes:

 Want some swag as appreciation for your contribution?

-# Prowler Developer Guide
-https://goto.prowler.com/devguide
+## Prowler Developer Guide
+
+<https://goto.prowler.com/devguide>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <p align="center">
-  <img align="center" src="https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/docs/img/prowler-logo-black.png#gh-light-mode-only" width="50%" height="50%">
-  <img align="center" src="https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/docs/img/prowler-logo-white.png#gh-dark-mode-only" width="50%" height="50%">
+  <img align="center" alt="Prowler logo" src="https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/docs/img/prowler-logo-black.png#gh-light-mode-only" width="50%" height="50%">
+  <img align="center" alt="Prowler logo" src="https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/docs/img/prowler-logo-white.png#gh-dark-mode-only" width="50%" height="50%">
 </p>
 <p align="center">
  <b><i>Prowler</b> is the Open Cloud Security Platform trusted by thousands to automate security and compliance in any cloud environment. With hundreds of ready-to-use checks and compliance frameworks, Prowler delivers real-time, customizable monitoring and seamless integrations, making cloud security simple, scalable, and cost-effective for organizations of any size.
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
  <a href="https://pypistats.org/packages/prowler"><img alt="PyPI Downloads" src="https://img.shields.io/pypi/dw/prowler.svg?label=downloads"></a>
  <a href="https://hub.docker.com/r/toniblyx/prowler"><img alt="Docker Pulls" src="https://img.shields.io/docker/pulls/toniblyx/prowler"></a>
  <a href="https://gallery.ecr.aws/prowler-cloud/prowler"><img width="120" height=19" alt="AWS ECR Gallery" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3985464/151531396-b6535a68-c907-44eb-95a1-a09508178616.png"></a>
-  <a href="https://codecov.io/gh/prowler-cloud/prowler"><img src="https://codecov.io/gh/prowler-cloud/prowler/graph/badge.svg?token=OflBGsdpDl"/></a>
-  <a href="https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/prowler-cloud-prowler"><img src="https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/api/badge/health-score?project=prowler-cloud-prowler"/></a>
+  <a href="https://codecov.io/gh/prowler-cloud/prowler"><img alt="Codecov coverage" src="https://codecov.io/gh/prowler-cloud/prowler/graph/badge.svg?token=OflBGsdpDl"/></a>
+  <a href="https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/prowler-cloud-prowler"><img alt="Linux Foundation insights health score" src="https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/api/badge/health-score?project=prowler-cloud-prowler"/></a>
 </p>
 <p align="center">
    <a href="https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases"><img alt="Version" src="https://img.shields.io/github/v/release/prowler-cloud/prowler"></a>
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 </p>
 <hr>
 <p align="center">
-  <img align="center" src="/docs/img/prowler-cloud.gif" width="100%" height="100%">
+  <img align="center" alt="Prowler Cloud demo" src="/docs/img/prowler-cloud.gif" width="100%" height="100%">
 </p>

 # Description
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Every AWS provider scan will enqueue an Attack Paths ingestion job automatically
 | Vercel | 26 | 6 | 0 | 8 | Official | UI, API, CLI |
 | Okta | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Official | CLI |
 | Scaleway [Contact us](https://prowler.com/contact) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Unofficial | CLI |
+| StackIT [Contact us](https://prowler.com/contact) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Unofficial | CLI |
 | NHN | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Unofficial | CLI |

 > [!Note]
@@ -146,11 +147,13 @@ Prowler App offers flexible installation methods tailored to various environment

 ### Docker Compose

-**Requirements**
+#### Requirements

-* `Docker Compose` installed: https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/.
+- `Docker Compose` installed: https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/.

-**Commands**
+#### Commands
+
+_macOS/Linux:_

 ``` console
 VERSION=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name)
@@ -160,6 +163,16 @@ curl -sLO "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/${V
 docker compose up -d
 ```

+_Windows PowerShell:_
+
+``` powershell
+$VERSION = (Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://api.github.com/repos/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases/latest").tag_name
+Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/$VERSION/docker-compose.yml" -OutFile "docker-compose.yml"
+# Environment variables can be customized in the .env file. Using default values in production environments is not recommended.
+Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/$VERSION/.env" -OutFile ".env"
+docker compose up -d
+```
+
 > [!WARNING]
 > 🔒 For a secure setup, the API auto-generates a unique key pair, `DJANGO_TOKEN_SIGNING_KEY` and `DJANGO_TOKEN_VERIFYING_KEY`, and stores it in `~/.config/prowler-api` (non-container) or the bound Docker volume in `_data/api` (container). Never commit or reuse static/default keys. To rotate keys, delete the stored key files and restart the API.

@@ -175,14 +188,14 @@ You can find more information in the [Troubleshooting](./docs/troubleshooting.md

 ### From GitHub

-**Requirements**
+#### Requirements

-* `git` installed.
-* `uv` installed: [uv installation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/).
-* `pnpm` installed: [pnpm installation](https://pnpm.io/installation).
-* `Docker Compose` installed: https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/.
+- `git` installed.
+- `uv` installed: [uv installation](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/).
+- `pnpm` installed: [pnpm installation](https://pnpm.io/installation).
+- `Docker Compose` installed: https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/.

-**Commands to run the API**
+#### Commands to run the API

 ``` console
 git clone https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler
@@ -199,7 +212,7 @@ gunicorn -c config/guniconf.py config.wsgi:application

 > After completing the setup, access the API documentation at http://localhost:8080/api/v1/docs.

-**Commands to run the API Worker**
+#### Commands to run the API Worker

 ``` console
 git clone https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler
@@ -212,7 +225,7 @@ cd src/backend
 python -m celery -A config.celery worker -l info -E
 ```

-**Commands to run the API Scheduler**
+#### Commands to run the API Scheduler

 ``` console
 git clone https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler
@@ -225,7 +238,7 @@ cd src/backend
 python -m celery -A config.celery beat -l info --scheduler django_celery_beat.schedulers:DatabaseScheduler
 ```

-**Commands to run the UI**
+#### Commands to run the UI

 ``` console
 git clone https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler
@@ -237,7 +250,7 @@ pnpm start

 > Once configured, access the Prowler App at http://localhost:3000. Sign up using your email and password to get started.

-**Pre-commit Hooks Setup**
+#### Pre-commit Hooks Setup

 Some pre-commit hooks require tools installed on your system:

@@ -257,14 +270,14 @@ prowler -v

 ### Containers

-**Available Versions of Prowler CLI**
+#### Available Versions of Prowler CLI

 The following versions of Prowler CLI are available, depending on your requirements:

 - `latest`: Synchronizes with the `master` branch. Note that this version is not stable.
 - `v4-latest`: Synchronizes with the `v4` branch. Note that this version is not stable.
 - `v3-latest`: Synchronizes with the `v3` branch. Note that this version is not stable.
- `<x.y.z>` (release): Stable releases corresponding to specific versions. You can find the complete list of releases [here](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases).
+- `<x.y.z>` (release): Stable releases corresponding to specific versions. See the [complete list of Prowler releases](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases).
 - `stable`: Always points to the latest release.
 - `v4-stable`: Always points to the latest release for v4.
 - `v3-stable`: Always points to the latest release for v3.
@@ -293,7 +306,7 @@ python prowler-cli.py -v

 # 🛡️ GitHub Action

-The official **Prowler GitHub Action** runs Prowler scans in your GitHub workflows using the official [`prowlercloud/prowler`](https://hub.docker.com/r/prowlercloud/prowler) Docker image. Scans run on any [supported provider](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/providers/), with optional [`--push-to-cloud`](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings) to send findings to Prowler Cloud and optional SARIF upload so findings show up in the repo's **Security → Code scanning** tab and as inline PR annotations.
+The official **Prowler GitHub Action** runs Prowler scans in your GitHub workflows using the official [`prowlercloud/prowler`](https://hub.docker.com/r/prowlercloud/prowler) Docker image. Scans run on any [supported provider](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/providers/), with optional [`--push-to-cloud`](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings) to send findings to Prowler Cloud and optional SARIF upload so findings show up in the repo's **Security → Code scanning** tab and as inline PR annotations.

 ```yaml
 name: Prowler IaC Scan
@@ -338,7 +351,7 @@ Full configuration, per-provider authentication, and SARIF examples: [Prowler Gi

 ## Prowler CLI

-**Running Prowler**
+### Running Prowler

 Prowler can be executed across various environments, offering flexibility to meet your needs. It can be run from:

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ inputs:
    required: false
    default: json-ocsf
  push-to-cloud:
-    description: Push scan findings to Prowler Cloud. Requires the PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable. See https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings#using-the-cli
+    description: Push scan findings to Prowler Cloud. Requires the PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable. See https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings#using-the-cli
    required: false
    default: "false"
  flags:
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ runs:

    - name: Upload SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning
      if: always() && inputs.upload-sarif == 'true' && steps.find-sarif.outputs.sarif_path != ''
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e # v4.35.4
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa # v4.36.0
      with:
        sarif_file: ${{ steps.find-sarif.outputs.sarif_path }}
        category: ${{ inputs.sarif-category }}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ runs:
            echo ""
            echo "**Get started in 3 steps:**"
            echo "1. Create an account at [cloud.prowler.com](https://cloud.prowler.com)"
-            echo "2. Generate a Prowler Cloud API key ([docs](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings#using-the-cli))"
+            echo "2. Generate a Prowler Cloud API key ([docs](https://docs.prowler.com/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings#using-the-cli))"
            echo "3. Add \`PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY\` to your GitHub secrets and set \`push-to-cloud: true\` on this action"
            echo ""
            echo "See [prowler.com/pricing](https://prowler.com/pricing) for plan details."
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 > - [`jsonapi`](../skills/jsonapi/SKILL.md) - Strict JSON:API v1.1 spec compliance
 > - [`pytest`](../skills/pytest/SKILL.md) - Generic pytest patterns

-### Auto-invoke Skills
+## Auto-invoke Skills

 When performing these actions, ALWAYS invoke the corresponding skill FIRST:

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ When performing these actions, ALWAYS invoke the corresponding skill FIRST:
 ## DECISION TREES

 ### Serializer Selection
-```
+```text
 Read → <Model>Serializer
 Create → <Model>CreateSerializer
 Update → <Model>UpdateSerializer
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Nested read → <Model>IncludeSerializer
 ```

 ### Task vs View
-```
+```text
 < 100ms → View
 > 100ms or external API → Celery task
 Needs retry → Celery task
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Django 5.1.x | DRF 3.15.x | djangorestframework-jsonapi 7.x | Celery 5.4.x | Pos

 ## PROJECT STRUCTURE

-```
+```text
 api/src/backend/
 ├── api/                    # Main Django app
 │   ├── v1/                # API version 1 (views, serializers, urls)
@@ -2,11 +2,40 @@

 All notable changes to the **Prowler API** are documented in this file.

-## [1.30.0] (Prowler UNRELEASED)
+## [1.31.0] (Prowler UNRELEASED)
+
+### 🚀 Added
+
+- Automatic recovery of allowlisted idempotent background tasks whose worker died during a deploy or crash: stuck scan and summary tasks are detected and re-run instead of staying pending forever, with a `reconcile_orphan_tasks` management command for on-demand recovery [(#11416)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11416)
+- Jira integration no longer creates duplicate issues on a retried send; findings already ticketed are skipped [(#11416)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11416)
+- DORA compliance framework support [(#11131)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11131)
+
+### 🔄 Changed
+
+- Allowlisted idempotent background tasks are no longer lost when a worker is stopped or crashes mid-task; tasks with external side effects are marked terminal instead of blindly re-running [(#11416)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11416)
+- A recovered scan rewrites its findings, summaries, attack surface, and compliance data instead of appending to the previous run, so recovery never leaves stale or duplicate materialized rows [(#11416)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11416)
+
+### 🐞 Fixed
+
+- Workers now shut down gracefully on deploy or restart, finishing or re-queueing in-flight tasks instead of being force-killed and leaving them stuck [(#11416)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11416)
+
+---
+
+## [1.30.1] (Prowler v5.29.1)
+
+### 🐞 Fixed
+
+- `GET /api/v1/findings` N+1 query loading `resources__tags` when listing findings [(#11420)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11420)
+- Clean up the scan tmp output directory when `scan-report` fails so partial files do not accumulate and fill the worker disk (`No space left on device`) [(#11421)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11421)
+
+---
+
+## [1.30.0] (Prowler v5.29.0)

 ### 🔄 Changed

 - Scan finding ingestion: bulk-resolve `Resource`/`ResourceTag` rows, replace per-mapping `SELECT FOR UPDATE` with deferred `ResourceTagMapping.bulk_create(ignore_conflicts=True)`, wrap each micro-batch in a single `rls_transaction`, and raise `SCAN_DB_BATCH_SIZE` to 1000 [(#11249)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11249)
+- Faster `GET /api/v1/finding-groups/latest` aggregation on tenants where one recent scan holds most findings [(#11380)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11380)

 ---

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 This repository contains the JSON API and Task Runner components for Prowler, which facilitate a complete backend that interacts with the Prowler SDK and is used by the Prowler UI.

-# Components
+## Components
 The Prowler API is composed of the following components:

 - The JSON API, which is an API built with Django Rest Framework.
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ The Prowler API is composed of the following components:
 - The PostgreSQL database, which is used to store the data.
 - The Valkey database, which is an in-memory database which is used as a message broker for the Celery workers.

-## Note about Valkey
+### Note about Valkey

 [Valkey](https://valkey.io/) is an open source (BSD) high performance key/value datastore.

 Valkey exposes a Redis 7.2 compliant API. Any service that exposes the Redis API can be used with Prowler API.

-# Modify environment variables
+## Modify environment variables

 Under the root path of the project, you can find a file called `.env`. This file shows all the environment variables that the project uses. You should review it and set the values for the variables you want to change.

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ If you don’t set `DJANGO_TOKEN_SIGNING_KEY` or `DJANGO_TOKEN_VERIFYING_KEY`, t

 **Important note**: Every Prowler version (or repository branches and tags) could have different variables set in its `.env` file. Please use the `.env` file that corresponds with each version.

-## Local deployment
+### Local deployment
 Keep in mind if you export the `.env` file to use it with local deployment that you will have to do it within the context of the virtual environment, not before. Otherwise, variables will not be loaded properly.

 To do this, you can run:
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ set -a
 source .env
 ```

-# 🚀 Production deployment
-## Docker deployment
+## 🚀 Production deployment
+### Docker deployment

 This method requires `docker` and `docker compose`.

-### Clone the repository
+#### Clone the repository

 ```console
 # HTTPS
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ git clone git@github.com:prowler-cloud/api.git

 ```

-### Build the base image
+#### Build the base image

 ```console
 docker compose --profile prod build
 ```

-### Run the production service
+#### Run the production service

 This command will start the Django production server and the Celery worker and also the Valkey and PostgreSQL databases.

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ You can access the server in `http://localhost:8080`.

 > **NOTE:** notice how the port is different. When developing using docker, the port will be `8080` to prevent conflicts.

-### View the Production Server Logs
+#### View the Production Server Logs

 To view the logs for any component (e.g., Django, Celery worker), you can use the following command with a wildcard. This command will follow logs for any container that matches the specified pattern:

@@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ gunicorn -c config/guniconf.py config.wsgi:application

 > By default, the Gunicorn server will try to use as many workers as your machine can handle. You can manually change that in the `src/backend/config/guniconf.py` file.

-# 🧪 Development guide
+## 🧪 Development guide

-## Local deployment
+### Local deployment

 To use this method, you'll need to set up a Python virtual environment (version ">=3.11,<3.13") and keep dependencies updated. Additionally, ensure that `uv` and `docker compose` are installed.

-### Clone the repository
+#### Clone the repository

 ```console
 # HTTPS
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ git clone git@github.com:prowler-cloud/api.git

 ```

-### Start the PostgreSQL Database and Valkey
+#### Start the PostgreSQL Database and Valkey

 The PostgreSQL database (version 16.3) and Valkey (version 7) are required for the development environment. To make development easier, we have provided a `docker-compose` file that will start these components for you.

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ The PostgreSQL database (version 16.3) and Valkey (version 7) are required for t
 docker compose up postgres valkey -d
 ```

-### Install the Python dependencies
+#### Install the Python dependencies

 > You must have uv installed

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ docker compose up postgres valkey -d
 uv sync
 ```

-### Apply migrations
+#### Apply migrations

 For migrations, you need to force the `admin` database router. Assuming you have the correct environment variables and Python virtual environment, run:

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ cd src/backend
 python manage.py migrate --database admin
 ```

-### Run the Django development server
+#### Run the Django development server

 ```console
 cd src/backend
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ python manage.py runserver
 You can access the server in `http://localhost:8000`.
 All changes in the code will be automatically reloaded in the server.

-### Run the Celery worker
+#### Run the Celery worker

 ```console
 python -m celery -A config.celery worker -l info -E
@@ -196,11 +196,11 @@ python -m celery -A config.celery worker -l info -E

 The Celery worker does not detect and reload changes in the code, so you need to restart it manually when you make changes.

-## Docker deployment
+### Docker deployment

 This method requires `docker` and `docker compose`.

-### Clone the repository
+#### Clone the repository

 ```console
 # HTTPS
@@ -211,13 +211,13 @@ git clone git@github.com:prowler-cloud/api.git

 ```

-### Build the base image
+#### Build the base image

 ```console
 docker compose --profile dev build
 ```

-### Run the development service
+#### Run the development service

 This command will start the Django development server and the Celery worker and also the Valkey and PostgreSQL databases.

@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ All changes in the code will be automatically reloaded in the server.

 > **NOTE:** notice how the port is different. When developing using docker, the port will be `8080` to prevent conflicts.

-### View the development server logs
+#### View the development server logs

 To view the logs for any component (e.g., Django, Celery worker), you can use the following command with a wildcard. This command will follow logs for any container that matches the specified pattern:

@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ To view the logs for any component (e.g., Django, Celery worker), you can use th
 docker logs -f $(docker ps --format "{{.Names}}" | grep 'api-')
 ```

-## Applying migrations
+### Applying migrations

 For migrations, you need to force the `admin` database router. Assuming you have the correct environment variables and Python virtual environment, run:

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ cd src/backend
 uv run python manage.py migrate --database admin
 ```

-## Apply fixtures
+### Apply fixtures

 Fixtures are used to populate the database with initial development data.

@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ uv run python manage.py loaddata api/fixtures/0_dev_users.json --database admin

 > The default credentials are `dev@prowler.com:Thisisapassword123@` or `dev2@prowler.com:Thisisapassword123@`

-## Run tests
+### Run tests

 Note that the tests will fail if you use the same `.env` file as the development environment.

@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ cd src/backend
 uv run pytest
 ```

-# Custom commands
+## Custom commands

 Django provides a way to create custom commands that can be run from the command line.

@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ To run a custom command, you need to be in the `prowler/api/src/backend` directo
 uv run python manage.py <command_name>
 ```

-## Generate dummy data
+### Generate dummy data

 ```console
 python manage.py findings --tenant
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ This command creates, for a given tenant, a provider, scan and a set of findings
 >
 > The last step is required to access the findings details, since the UI needs that to print all the information.

-### Example
+#### Example

 ```console
 ~/backend $ uv run python manage.py findings --tenant
@@ -22,12 +22,12 @@ apply_fixtures() {

 start_dev_server() {
  echo "Starting the development server..."
-  uv run python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:"${DJANGO_PORT:-8080}"
+  exec uv run python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:"${DJANGO_PORT:-8080}"
 }

 start_prod_server() {
  echo "Starting the Gunicorn server..."
-  uv run gunicorn -c config/guniconf.py config.wsgi:application
+  exec uv run gunicorn -c config/guniconf.py config.wsgi:application
 }

 resolve_worker_hostname() {
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ resolve_worker_hostname() {

 start_worker() {
  echo "Starting the worker..."
-  uv run python -m celery -A config.celery worker \
+  exec uv run python -m celery -A config.celery worker \
    -n "$(resolve_worker_hostname)" \
    -l "${DJANGO_LOGGING_LEVEL:-info}" \
    -Q celery,scans,scan-reports,deletion,backfill,overview,integrations,compliance,attack-paths-scans \
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ start_worker() {

 start_worker_beat() {
  echo "Starting the worker-beat..."
-  uv run python -m celery -A config.celery beat -l "${DJANGO_LOGGING_LEVEL:-info}" --scheduler django_celery_beat.schedulers:DatabaseScheduler
+  exec uv run python -m celery -A config.celery beat -l "${DJANGO_LOGGING_LEVEL:-info}" --scheduler django_celery_beat.schedulers:DatabaseScheduler
 }

 manage_db_partitions() {
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Orphan Celery task recovery
+
+When a worker is terminated mid-task (a deploy, an OOM kill, a node eviction), the
+task it was running can be left non-terminal forever: the `Scan` stays `EXECUTING`,
+the `TaskResult` stays `STARTED`, and nothing re-runs it. This page describes the
+mechanisms that detect and recover allowlisted idempotent orphans so users never
+see a stuck scan and pending-task alerts do not fire.
+
+## How recovery works
+
+1. **Durable delivery.** The broker is configured so a task message is acknowledged
+   only after the task finishes (`task_acks_late`), one task is reserved at a time
+   (`worker_prefetch_multiplier = 1`), and an abruptly-lost worker re-queues its task
+   (`task_reject_on_worker_lost`). On `SIGTERM` the worker is given a soft-shutdown
+   window (`worker_soft_shutdown_timeout`) to finish or re-queue in-flight work
+   before it is force-killed.
+
+2. **Periodic watchdog.** A Beat task, `reconcile-orphan-tasks`, runs every couple of
+   minutes (a `django_celery_beat` periodic task created by migration). For each
+   in-flight task result with an allowlisted idempotent task name, it pings the
+   worker recorded on the task's `TaskResult`:
+   - worker responds -> the task is still running, leave it alone;
+   - worker is gone (and the scan started before a short grace window) -> it is a
+     real orphan: the stale task is revoked and marked terminal (clearing the
+     pending/started alert), and the scan is re-enqueued from scratch.
+
+   The re-run is safe because only tasks with proven idempotency are allowlisted.
+   Scan persistence, for example, clears the scan's prior findings and materialized
+   summary/compliance rows before re-writing them. Jira sends are allowlisted too:
+   each finding is reserved in a dispatch table before the external call, so a re-run
+   skips already-ticketed findings (the worst case is one finding missed if a worker
+   is hard-killed mid-send, never a duplicate issue). Other external side effects stay
+   terminal: the S3 upload rebuilds from worker-local files that do not survive a
+   crash, and report/Security Hub recovery is out of scope.
+
+3. **Recovery cap.** Each automatic re-enqueue increments `Scan.recovery_count`.
+   After `--max-attempts` recoveries (default 3) the scan is marked `FAILED` instead
+   of re-enqueued, so a task that repeatedly kills its worker cannot loop forever.
+
+A Postgres advisory lock ensures that, even with multiple API/worker replicas, only
+one reconciliation runs at a time; the others no-op.
+
+## On-demand command
+
+The same logic is available as a management command, useful right after a deploy or
+for manual intervention:
+
+```bash
+python manage.py reconcile_orphan_tasks            # recover now
+python manage.py reconcile_orphan_tasks --dry-run  # report orphans, change nothing
+python manage.py reconcile_orphan_tasks --grace-minutes 5 --max-attempts 3
+```
+
+## Configuration
+
+All settings have safe defaults; override via environment variables.
+
+| Env var | Default | Purpose |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_WORKER_PREFETCH_MULTIPLIER` | `1` | Tasks reserved per worker process. |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_WORKER_SOFT_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT` | `60` | Seconds the worker drains/re-queues on `SIGTERM` before force-kill. |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_TASK_TIME_LIMIT` | `21600` (6h) | Hard limit for most tasks; connection checks are capped at 120s. |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_TASK_SOFT_TIME_LIMIT` | hard - 600 | Soft limit; raises `SoftTimeLimitExceeded` for cleanup. |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_LONG_TASK_TIME_LIMIT` | `172800` (48h) | Hard limit for scans and provider/tenant deletions, which can legitimately run for more than a day. |
+| `DJANGO_CELERY_LONG_TASK_SOFT_TIME_LIMIT` | long hard - 600 | Soft limit for the long-running tasks above. |
+
+`task_acks_late` and `task_reject_on_worker_lost` are enabled in `config/celery.py`.
+
+## Deployment requirement
+
+Two conditions must both hold for the soft shutdown to actually drain work:
+
+1. **The worker must receive `SIGTERM`.** The container entrypoint `exec`s the
+   Celery process so it runs as PID 1; otherwise `SIGTERM` from `docker stop`/ECS
+   hits the entrypoint shell, never reaches Celery, and the worker is hard-killed
+   (SIGKILL) at the grace deadline without draining. Custom entrypoints must
+   preserve the `exec`.
+2. **The orchestrator must give the worker enough time** before force-killing it.
+   Set the stop grace period to exceed `DJANGO_CELERY_WORKER_SOFT_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT`
+   plus a margin:
+   - **docker-compose:** `stop_grace_period` on the worker services (set to `120s`).
+   - **AWS ECS:** the worker container `stopTimeout` (configured in the deployment
+     repository).
+
+If either condition is missing, long tasks are still recovered by the watchdog,
+but they are cut mid-run on every deploy instead of draining.
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ name = "prowler-api"
 package-mode = false
 # Needed for the SDK compatibility
 requires-python = ">=3.11,<3.13"
-version = "1.30.0"
+version = "1.31.0"

 [tool.uv]
 # Transitive pins matching master to avoid silent drift; bump deliberately.
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 from collections.abc import Iterable, Mapping

 from api.models import Provider
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
+from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import (
+    get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal,
+)
 from prowler.lib.check.models import CheckMetadata

 AVAILABLE_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS = {}
@@ -94,25 +96,22 @@ PROWLER_CHECKS = LazyChecksMapping()


 def get_compliance_frameworks(provider_type: Provider.ProviderChoices) -> list[str]:
-    """List compliance frameworks the API can load for `provider_type`.
+    """List compliance framework identifiers available for `provider_type`.

-    The list is sourced from `Compliance.get_bulk` so that the names
-    returned here are guaranteed to be loadable by the bulk loader. This
-    prevents downstream key mismatches (e.g. CSV report generation iterating
-    framework names and looking them up in the bulk dict).
+    Includes both per-provider frameworks and universal top-level frameworks
+    (e.g. ``dora``, ``csa_ccm_4.0``).

    Args:
-        provider_type (Provider.ProviderChoices): The cloud provider type for which to retrieve
-            available compliance frameworks (e.g., "aws", "azure", "gcp", "m365").
+        provider_type (Provider.ProviderChoices): The cloud provider type
+            (e.g., "aws", "azure", "gcp", "m365").

    Returns:
-        list[str]: A list of framework identifiers (e.g., "cis_1.4_aws", "mitre_attack_azure") available
-        for the given provider.
+        list[str]: Framework identifiers (e.g., "cis_1.4_aws", "dora").
    """
    global AVAILABLE_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS
    if provider_type not in AVAILABLE_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS:
        AVAILABLE_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS[provider_type] = list(
-            Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type).keys()
+            get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(provider_type).keys()
        )

    return AVAILABLE_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS[provider_type]
@@ -139,18 +138,14 @@ def get_prowler_provider_compliance(provider_type: Provider.ProviderChoices) ->
    """
    Retrieve the Prowler compliance data for a specified provider type.

-    This function fetches the compliance frameworks and their associated
-    requirements for the given cloud provider.
-
    Args:
        provider_type (Provider.ProviderChoices): The provider type
            (e.g., 'aws', 'azure') for which to retrieve compliance data.

    Returns:
-        dict: A dictionary mapping compliance framework names to their respective
-            Compliance objects for the specified provider.
+        dict: Mapping of framework name to `ComplianceFramework` for the provider.
    """
-    return Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type)
+    return get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(provider_type)


 def _load_provider_assets(provider_type: Provider.ProviderChoices) -> tuple[dict, dict]:
@@ -209,8 +204,8 @@ def load_prowler_checks(
        for compliance_name, compliance_data in prowler_compliance.get(
            provider_type, {}
        ).items():
-            for requirement in compliance_data.Requirements:
-                for check in requirement.Checks:
+            for requirement in compliance_data.requirements:
+                for check in requirement.checks.get(provider_type, []):
                    try:
                        checks[provider_type][check].add(compliance_name)
                    except KeyError:
@@ -290,24 +285,40 @@ def generate_compliance_overview_template(
            requirements_status = {"passed": 0, "failed": 0, "manual": 0}
            total_requirements = 0

-            for requirement in compliance_data.Requirements:
+            for requirement in compliance_data.requirements:
                total_requirements += 1
-                total_checks = len(requirement.Checks)
-                checks_dict = {check: None for check in requirement.Checks}
+                provider_check_list = list(requirement.checks.get(provider_type, []))
+                total_checks = len(provider_check_list)
+                checks_dict = {check: None for check in provider_check_list}

                req_status_val = "MANUAL" if total_checks == 0 else "PASS"

+                # MITRE attrs are wrapped under `_raw_attributes` by the
+                # universal adapter — unwrap so consumers see the flat list.
+                requirement_attributes = requirement.attributes
+                if (
+                    isinstance(requirement_attributes, dict)
+                    and "_raw_attributes" in requirement_attributes
+                ):
+                    attributes_payload = list(requirement_attributes["_raw_attributes"])
+                elif isinstance(requirement_attributes, dict):
+                    attributes_payload = (
+                        [dict(requirement_attributes)] if requirement_attributes else []
+                    )
+                else:
+                    attributes_payload = [
+                        dict(attribute) for attribute in requirement_attributes
+                    ]
+
                # Build requirement dictionary
                requirement_dict = {
-                    "name": requirement.Name or requirement.Id,
-                    "description": requirement.Description,
-                    "tactics": getattr(requirement, "Tactics", []),
-                    "subtechniques": getattr(requirement, "SubTechniques", []),
-                    "platforms": getattr(requirement, "Platforms", []),
-                    "technique_url": getattr(requirement, "TechniqueURL", ""),
-                    "attributes": [
-                        dict(attribute) for attribute in requirement.Attributes
-                    ],
+                    "name": requirement.name or requirement.id,
+                    "description": requirement.description,
+                    "tactics": requirement.tactics or [],
+                    "subtechniques": requirement.sub_techniques or [],
+                    "platforms": requirement.platforms or [],
+                    "technique_url": requirement.technique_url or "",
+                    "attributes": attributes_payload,
                    "checks": checks_dict,
                    "checks_status": {
                        "pass": 0,
@@ -325,15 +336,15 @@ def generate_compliance_overview_template(
                    requirements_status["passed"] += 1

                # Add requirement to compliance requirements
-                compliance_requirements[requirement.Id] = requirement_dict
+                compliance_requirements[requirement.id] = requirement_dict

            # Build compliance dictionary
            compliance_dict = {
-                "framework": compliance_data.Framework,
-                "name": compliance_data.Name,
-                "version": compliance_data.Version,
+                "framework": compliance_data.framework,
+                "name": compliance_data.name,
+                "version": compliance_data.version,
                "provider": provider_type,
-                "description": compliance_data.Description,
+                "description": compliance_data.description,
                "requirements": compliance_requirements,
                "requirements_status": requirements_status,
                "total_requirements": total_requirements,
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+from django.core.management.base import BaseCommand
+
+from tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery import reconcile_orphans
+
+
+class Command(BaseCommand):
+    help = (
+        "Recover orphaned allowlisted Celery tasks whose worker is gone and mark "
+        "other stale task results terminal. Single-flight via a Postgres advisory lock."
+    )
+
+    def add_arguments(self, parser):
+        parser.add_argument(
+            "--grace-minutes",
+            type=int,
+            default=2,
+            help="Skip tasks started within this window (worker may still register).",
+        )
+        parser.add_argument(
+            "--max-attempts",
+            type=int,
+            default=3,
+            help="Give up re-running a task after this many recovery attempts (scans are marked FAILED).",
+        )
+        parser.add_argument(
+            "--dry-run",
+            action="store_true",
+            help="Detect and report orphans without revoking or re-enqueuing.",
+        )
+
+    def handle(self, *args, **options):
+        result = reconcile_orphans(
+            grace_minutes=options["grace_minutes"],
+            max_attempts=options["max_attempts"],
+            dry_run=options["dry_run"],
+        )
+
+        if not result.get("acquired"):
+            self.stdout.write("Reconcile skipped: another run holds the lock.")
+            return
+
+        self.stdout.write(
+            self.style.SUCCESS(
+                "Orphan reconcile complete: "
+                f"recovered={len(result.get('recovered', []))} "
+                f"failed={len(result.get('failed', []))} "
+                f"skipped(in-flight)={len(result.get('skipped', []))}"
+            )
+        )
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Generated by Django 5.1.15 on 2026-05-30 17:38
+
+from django.db import migrations, models
+
+
+class Migration(migrations.Migration):
+    dependencies = [
+        ("api", "0093_okta_provider"),
+    ]
+
+    operations = [
+        migrations.AddField(
+            model_name="scan",
+            name="recovery_count",
+            field=models.IntegerField(default=0),
+        ),
+    ]
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+from django.db import migrations
+
+
+TASK_NAME = "reconcile-orphan-tasks"
+INTERVAL_MINUTES = 2
+
+
+def create_periodic_task(apps, schema_editor):
+    IntervalSchedule = apps.get_model("django_celery_beat", "IntervalSchedule")
+    PeriodicTask = apps.get_model("django_celery_beat", "PeriodicTask")
+
+    schedule, _ = IntervalSchedule.objects.get_or_create(
+        every=INTERVAL_MINUTES,
+        period="minutes",
+    )
+
+    PeriodicTask.objects.update_or_create(
+        name=TASK_NAME,
+        defaults={
+            "task": TASK_NAME,
+            "interval": schedule,
+            "enabled": True,
+        },
+    )
+
+
+def delete_periodic_task(apps, schema_editor):
+    IntervalSchedule = apps.get_model("django_celery_beat", "IntervalSchedule")
+    PeriodicTask = apps.get_model("django_celery_beat", "PeriodicTask")
+
+    PeriodicTask.objects.filter(name=TASK_NAME).delete()
+
+    # Clean up the schedule if no other task references it
+    IntervalSchedule.objects.filter(
+        every=INTERVAL_MINUTES,
+        period="minutes",
+        periodictask__isnull=True,
+    ).delete()
+
+
+class Migration(migrations.Migration):
+    dependencies = [
+        ("api", "0094_scan_recovery_count"),
+        ("django_celery_beat", "0019_alter_periodictasks_options"),
+    ]
+
+    operations = [
+        migrations.RunPython(create_periodic_task, delete_periodic_task),
+    ]
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+import uuid
+
+import django.db.models.deletion
+from django.db import migrations, models
+
+import api.rls
+
+
+class Migration(migrations.Migration):
+    dependencies = [
+        ("api", "0095_reconcile_orphan_tasks_periodic_task"),
+    ]
+
+    operations = [
+        migrations.CreateModel(
+            name="JiraIssueDispatch",
+            fields=[
+                (
+                    "id",
+                    models.UUIDField(
+                        default=uuid.uuid4,
+                        editable=False,
+                        primary_key=True,
+                        serialize=False,
+                    ),
+                ),
+                ("inserted_at", models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),
+                ("finding_id", models.UUIDField()),
+                (
+                    "integration",
+                    models.ForeignKey(
+                        on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE,
+                        related_name="jira_dispatches",
+                        to="api.integration",
+                    ),
+                ),
+                (
+                    "tenant",
+                    models.ForeignKey(
+                        on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, to="api.tenant"
+                    ),
+                ),
+            ],
+            options={
+                "db_table": "jira_issue_dispatches",
+                "abstract": False,
+            },
+        ),
+        migrations.AddConstraint(
+            model_name="jiraissuedispatch",
+            constraint=models.UniqueConstraint(
+                fields=("tenant_id", "integration_id", "finding_id"),
+                name="unique_jira_issue_dispatch",
+            ),
+        ),
+        migrations.AddConstraint(
+            model_name="jiraissuedispatch",
+            constraint=api.rls.RowLevelSecurityConstraint(
+                "tenant_id",
+                name="rls_on_jiraissuedispatch",
+                statements=["SELECT", "INSERT", "UPDATE", "DELETE"],
+            ),
+        ),
+    ]
@@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ class Scan(RowLevelSecurityProtectedModel):
    state = StateEnumField(choices=StateChoices.choices, default=StateChoices.AVAILABLE)
    unique_resource_count = models.IntegerField(default=0)
    progress = models.IntegerField(default=0)
+    # Incremented by the scan-specific orphan-recovery path each time this scan is
+    # re-pointed to a fresh task; for observability (the retry cap is a Valkey counter).
+    recovery_count = models.IntegerField(default=0)
    scanner_args = models.JSONField(default=dict)
    duration = models.IntegerField(null=True, blank=True)
    scheduled_at = models.DateTimeField(null=True, blank=True)
@@ -1998,6 +2001,35 @@ class IntegrationProviderRelationship(RowLevelSecurityProtectedModel):
        ]


+class JiraIssueDispatch(RowLevelSecurityProtectedModel):
+    """Tracks findings already sent to a Jira integration.
+
+    Lets the Jira task be re-run safely (e.g. by orphan recovery): findings with
+    an existing dispatch row are skipped, so no duplicate issues are created.
+    """
+
+    id = models.UUIDField(primary_key=True, default=uuid4, editable=False)
+    inserted_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, editable=False)
+    integration = models.ForeignKey(
+        Integration, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="jira_dispatches"
+    )
+    finding_id = models.UUIDField()
+
+    class Meta(RowLevelSecurityProtectedModel.Meta):
+        db_table = "jira_issue_dispatches"
+        constraints = [
+            models.UniqueConstraint(
+                fields=["tenant_id", "integration_id", "finding_id"],
+                name="unique_jira_issue_dispatch",
+            ),
+            RowLevelSecurityConstraint(
+                field="tenant_id",
+                name="rls_on_%(class)s",
+                statements=["SELECT", "INSERT", "UPDATE", "DELETE"],
+            ),
+        ]
+
+
 class SAMLToken(models.Model):
    id = models.UUIDField(primary_key=True, default=uuid4, editable=False)
    inserted_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, editable=False)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 openapi: 3.0.3
 info:
  title: Prowler API
-  version: 1.30.0
+  version: 1.31.0
  description: |-
    Prowler API specification.

@@ -13137,8 +13137,59 @@ paths:
      responses:
        '200':
          description: CSV file containing the compliance report
+        '202':
+          description: The task is in progress
+        '403':
+          description: There is a problem with credentials
        '404':
-          description: Compliance report not found
+          description: Compliance report not found, or the scan has no reports yet
+  /api/v1/scans/{id}/compliance/{name}/ocsf:
+    get:
+      operationId: scans_compliance_ocsf_retrieve
+      description: Download a specific compliance report as an OCSF JSON file. Only
+        universal frameworks that declare an output configuration produce this artifact
+        (currently 'dora' and 'csa_ccm_4.0'); any other framework returns 404.
+      summary: Retrieve compliance report as OCSF JSON
+      parameters:
+      - in: query
+        name: fields[scan-reports]
+        schema:
+          type: array
+          items:
+            type: string
+            enum:
+            - id
+            - name
+        description: endpoint return only specific fields in the response on a per-type
+          basis by including a fields[TYPE] query parameter.
+        explode: false
+      - in: path
+        name: id
+        schema:
+          type: string
+          format: uuid
+        description: A UUID string identifying this scan.
+        required: true
+      - in: path
+        name: name
+        schema:
+          type: string
+        description: The compliance report name, like 'dora'
+        required: true
+      tags:
+      - Scan
+      security:
+      - JWT or API Key: []
+      responses:
+        '200':
+          description: OCSF JSON file containing the compliance report
+        '202':
+          description: The task is in progress
+        '403':
+          description: There is a problem with credentials
+        '404':
+          description: Compliance report not found, the framework does not provide
+            an OCSF export, or the scan has no reports yet
  /api/v1/scans/{id}/csa:
    get:
      operationId: scans_csa_retrieve
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ from api.compliance import (
    load_prowler_checks,
 )
 from api.models import Provider
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
+from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import (
+    get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal,
+)


 class TestCompliance:
@@ -28,16 +30,16 @@ class TestCompliance:
        assert set(checks) == {"check1", "check2", "check3"}
        mock_check_metadata.get_bulk.assert_called_once_with(provider_type)

-    @patch("api.compliance.Compliance")
-    def test_get_prowler_provider_compliance(self, mock_compliance):
+    @patch("api.compliance.get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal")
+    def test_get_prowler_provider_compliance(self, mock_get_bulk):
        provider_type = Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS
-        mock_compliance.get_bulk.return_value = {
+        mock_get_bulk.return_value = {
            "compliance1": MagicMock(),
            "compliance2": MagicMock(),
        }
        compliance_data = get_prowler_provider_compliance(provider_type)
-        assert compliance_data == mock_compliance.get_bulk.return_value
-        mock_compliance.get_bulk.assert_called_once_with(provider_type)
+        assert compliance_data == mock_get_bulk.return_value
+        mock_get_bulk.assert_called_once_with(provider_type)

    @patch("api.compliance.get_prowler_provider_checks")
    @patch("api.models.Provider.ProviderChoices")
@@ -51,9 +53,9 @@ class TestCompliance:
        prowler_compliance = {
            "aws": {
                "compliance1": MagicMock(
-                    Requirements=[
+                    requirements=[
                        MagicMock(
-                            Checks=["check1", "check2"],
+                            checks={"aws": ["check1", "check2"]},
                        ),
                    ],
                ),
@@ -167,35 +169,38 @@ class TestCompliance:
    def test_generate_compliance_overview_template(self, mock_provider_choices):
        mock_provider_choices.values = ["aws"]

+        # ``name`` is a reserved MagicMock kwarg (it labels the mock for repr,
+        # it does NOT set a ``.name`` attribute), so it must be assigned
+        # explicitly after construction.
        requirement1 = MagicMock(
-            Id="requirement1",
-            Name="Requirement 1",
-            Description="Description of requirement 1",
-            Attributes=[],
-            Checks=["check1", "check2"],
-            Tactics=["tactic1"],
-            SubTechniques=["subtechnique1"],
-            Platforms=["platform1"],
-            TechniqueURL="https://example.com",
+            id="requirement1",
+            description="Description of requirement 1",
+            attributes=[],
+            checks={"aws": ["check1", "check2"]},
+            tactics=["tactic1"],
+            sub_techniques=["subtechnique1"],
+            platforms=["platform1"],
+            technique_url="https://example.com",
        )
+        requirement1.name = "Requirement 1"
        requirement2 = MagicMock(
-            Id="requirement2",
-            Name="Requirement 2",
-            Description="Description of requirement 2",
-            Attributes=[],
-            Checks=[],
-            Tactics=[],
-            SubTechniques=[],
-            Platforms=[],
-            TechniqueURL="",
+            id="requirement2",
+            description="Description of requirement 2",
+            attributes=[],
+            checks={"aws": []},
+            tactics=[],
+            sub_techniques=[],
+            platforms=[],
+            technique_url="",
        )
+        requirement2.name = "Requirement 2"
        compliance1 = MagicMock(
-            Requirements=[requirement1, requirement2],
-            Framework="Framework 1",
-            Version="1.0",
-            Description="Description of compliance1",
-            Name="Compliance 1",
+            requirements=[requirement1, requirement2],
+            framework="Framework 1",
+            version="1.0",
+            description="Description of compliance1",
        )
+        compliance1.name = "Compliance 1"
        prowler_compliance = {"aws": {"compliance1": compliance1}}

        template = generate_compliance_overview_template(prowler_compliance)
@@ -271,24 +276,28 @@ def reset_compliance_cache():

 class TestGetComplianceFrameworks:
    def test_returns_keys_from_compliance_get_bulk(self, reset_compliance_cache):
-        with patch("api.compliance.Compliance") as mock_compliance:
-            mock_compliance.get_bulk.return_value = {
+        with patch(
+            "api.compliance.get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal"
+        ) as mock_get_bulk:
+            mock_get_bulk.return_value = {
                "cis_1.4_aws": MagicMock(),
                "mitre_attack_aws": MagicMock(),
            }
            result = get_compliance_frameworks(Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS)

        assert sorted(result) == ["cis_1.4_aws", "mitre_attack_aws"]
-        mock_compliance.get_bulk.assert_called_once_with(Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS)
+        mock_get_bulk.assert_called_once_with(Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS)

    def test_caches_result_per_provider(self, reset_compliance_cache):
-        with patch("api.compliance.Compliance") as mock_compliance:
-            mock_compliance.get_bulk.return_value = {"cis_1.4_aws": MagicMock()}
+        with patch(
+            "api.compliance.get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal"
+        ) as mock_get_bulk:
+            mock_get_bulk.return_value = {"cis_1.4_aws": MagicMock()}
            get_compliance_frameworks(Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS)
            get_compliance_frameworks(Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS)

        # Cached after first call.
-        assert mock_compliance.get_bulk.call_count == 1
+        assert mock_get_bulk.call_count == 1

    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
        "provider_type",
@@ -296,17 +305,19 @@ class TestGetComplianceFrameworks:
    )
    def test_listing_is_subset_of_bulk(self, reset_compliance_cache, provider_type):
        """Regression for CLOUD-API-40S: every name returned by
-        ``get_compliance_frameworks`` must be loadable via ``Compliance.get_bulk``.
+        ``get_compliance_frameworks`` must be loadable via
+        ``get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal``.

        A divergence here is what produced ``KeyError: 'csa_ccm_4.0'`` in
        ``generate_outputs_task`` after universal/multi-provider compliance
        JSONs were introduced at the top-level ``prowler/compliance/`` path.
        """
-        bulk_keys = set(Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type).keys())
+        bulk_keys = set(get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(provider_type).keys())
        listed = set(get_compliance_frameworks(provider_type))

        missing = listed - bulk_keys
        assert not missing, (
            f"get_compliance_frameworks({provider_type!r}) returned names not "
-            f"loadable by Compliance.get_bulk: {sorted(missing)}"
+            f"loadable by get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal: "
+            f"{sorted(missing)}"
        )
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ from conftest import (
    today_after_n_days,
 )
 from django.conf import settings
+from django.db import connection
 from django.db.models import Count
 from django.http import JsonResponse
 from django.test import RequestFactory
+from django.test.utils import CaptureQueriesContext
 from django.urls import reverse
 from django_celery_results.models import TaskResult
 from rest_framework import status
@@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ from api.models import (
    ProviderSecret,
    Resource,
    ResourceFindingMapping,
+    ResourceTag,
    Role,
    RoleProviderGroupRelationship,
    SAMLConfiguration,
@@ -3856,16 +3859,20 @@ class TestScanViewSet:
        scan.output_location = "dummy"
        scan.save()

-        dummy_task = Task.objects.create(tenant_id=scan.tenant_id)
-        dummy_task.id = "dummy-task-id"
-        dummy_task_data = {"id": dummy_task.id, "state": StateChoices.EXECUTING}
+        task_result = TaskResult.objects.create(
+            task_id=str(uuid4()),
+            task_name="scan-report",
+            task_kwargs={"scan_id": str(scan.id)},
+        )
+        task = Task.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=scan.tenant_id,
+            task_runner_task=task_result,
+        )
+        dummy_task_data = {"id": str(task.id), "state": StateChoices.EXECUTING}

-        with (
-            patch("api.v1.views.Task.objects.get", return_value=dummy_task),
-            patch(
-                "api.v1.views.TaskSerializer",
-                return_value=type("DummySerializer", (), {"data": dummy_task_data}),
-            ),
+        with patch(
+            "api.v1.views.TaskSerializer",
+            return_value=type("DummySerializer", (), {"data": dummy_task_data}),
        ):
            url = reverse("scan-report", kwargs={"pk": scan.id})
            response = authenticated_client.get(url)
@@ -4186,6 +4193,88 @@ class TestScanViewSet:
        assert resp.status_code == status.HTTP_302_FOUND
        assert resp["Location"] == presigned_url

+    def test_compliance_s3_returns_latest_match(
+        self, authenticated_client, scans_fixture, monkeypatch
+    ):
+        """When several files match, the most recently modified one is served."""
+        scan = scans_fixture[0]
+        bucket = "bucket"
+        scan.output_location = f"s3://{bucket}/path/scan.zip"
+        scan.state = StateChoices.COMPLETED
+        scan.save()
+
+        monkeypatch.setattr(
+            "api.v1.views.env",
+            type("env", (), {"str": lambda self, *args, **kwargs: "test-bucket"})(),
+        )
+
+        old_key = "path/compliance/prowler-output-aws-20240101000000_cis_1.4_aws.csv"
+        latest_key = "path/compliance/prowler-output-aws-20240202000000_cis_1.4_aws.csv"
+
+        class FakeS3Client:
+            def list_objects_v2(self, Bucket, Prefix):
+                return {
+                    "Contents": [
+                        {
+                            "Key": old_key,
+                            "LastModified": datetime(2024, 1, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
+                        },
+                        {
+                            "Key": latest_key,
+                            "LastModified": datetime(2024, 2, 2, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
+                        },
+                    ]
+                }
+
+            def generate_presigned_url(self, ClientMethod, Params, ExpiresIn):
+                assert Params["Key"] == latest_key
+                return "https://test-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/latest"
+
+        monkeypatch.setattr("api.v1.views.get_s3_client", lambda: FakeS3Client())
+
+        url = reverse("scan-compliance", kwargs={"pk": scan.id, "name": "cis_1.4_aws"})
+        resp = authenticated_client.get(url)
+        assert resp.status_code == status.HTTP_302_FOUND
+        assert resp["Location"].endswith("/latest")
+
+    def test_compliance_local_returns_latest_match(
+        self, authenticated_client, scans_fixture, monkeypatch
+    ):
+        """The local branch serves the most recently modified matching file."""
+        scan = scans_fixture[0]
+        scan.state = StateChoices.COMPLETED
+
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            comp_dir = Path(tmp) / "reports" / "compliance"
+            comp_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+
+            old_file = comp_dir / "prowler-output-aws-20240101000000_cis_1.4_aws.csv"
+            old_file.write_bytes(b"old")
+            latest_file = comp_dir / "prowler-output-aws-20240202000000_cis_1.4_aws.csv"
+            latest_file.write_bytes(b"latest")
+            # Make `latest_file` newer regardless of creation order.
+            os.utime(old_file, (1_700_000_000, 1_700_000_000))
+            os.utime(latest_file, (1_700_000_100, 1_700_000_100))
+
+            scan.output_location = str(Path(tmp) / "reports" / "scan.zip")
+            scan.save()
+
+            monkeypatch.setattr(
+                glob,
+                "glob",
+                lambda p: [str(old_file), str(latest_file)],
+            )
+
+            url = reverse(
+                "scan-compliance", kwargs={"pk": scan.id, "name": "cis_1.4_aws"}
+            )
+            resp = authenticated_client.get(url)
+            assert resp.status_code == status.HTTP_200_OK
+            assert resp.content == b"latest"
+            assert resp["Content-Disposition"].endswith(
+                f'filename="{latest_file.name}"'
+            )
+
    def test_compliance_s3_not_found(
        self, authenticated_client, scans_fixture, monkeypatch
    ):
@@ -4294,18 +4383,24 @@ class TestScanViewSet:
            assert cd.startswith('attachment; filename="')
            assert cd.endswith(f'filename="{fname.name}"')

-    @patch("api.v1.views.Task.objects.get")
    @patch("api.v1.views.TaskSerializer")
    def test__get_task_status_returns_none_if_task_not_executing(
-        self, mock_task_serializer, mock_task_get, authenticated_client, scans_fixture
+        self, mock_task_serializer, authenticated_client, scans_fixture
    ):
        scan = scans_fixture[0]
        scan.state = StateChoices.COMPLETED
        scan.output_location = "dummy"
        scan.save()

-        task = Task.objects.create(tenant_id=scan.tenant_id)
-        mock_task_get.return_value = task
+        task_result = TaskResult.objects.create(
+            task_id=str(uuid4()),
+            task_name="scan-report",
+            task_kwargs={"scan_id": str(scan.id)},
+        )
+        task = Task.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=scan.tenant_id,
+            task_runner_task=task_result,
+        )
        mock_task_serializer.return_value.data = {
            "id": str(task.id),
            "state": StateChoices.COMPLETED,
@@ -4326,6 +4421,7 @@ class TestScanViewSet:
        scan.save()

        task_result = TaskResult.objects.create(
+            task_id=str(uuid4()),
            task_name="scan-report",
            task_kwargs={"scan_id": str(scan.id)},
        )
@@ -4346,6 +4442,51 @@ class TestScanViewSet:
        assert response.status_code == status.HTTP_202_ACCEPTED
        assert response.data["id"] == str(task.id)

+    @patch("api.v1.views.TaskSerializer")
+    def test__get_task_status_returns_latest_task(
+        self, mock_task_serializer, authenticated_client, scans_fixture
+    ):
+        """With several scan-report tasks for the scan, the most recent is used."""
+        scan = scans_fixture[0]
+        scan.state = StateChoices.COMPLETED
+        scan.output_location = "dummy"
+        scan.save()
+
+        old_task = Task.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=scan.tenant_id,
+            task_runner_task=TaskResult.objects.create(
+                task_id=str(uuid4()),
+                task_name="scan-report",
+                task_kwargs={"scan_id": str(scan.id)},
+            ),
+        )
+        new_task = Task.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=scan.tenant_id,
+            task_runner_task=TaskResult.objects.create(
+                task_id=str(uuid4()),
+                task_name="scan-report",
+                task_kwargs={"scan_id": str(scan.id)},
+            ),
+        )
+        # `inserted_at` is `auto_now_add`, and within the test transaction the DB
+        # `now()` is constant, so force distinct timestamps to make order_by stable.
+        base = datetime(2024, 1, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
+        Task.objects.filter(pk=old_task.pk).update(inserted_at=base)
+        Task.objects.filter(pk=new_task.pk).update(
+            inserted_at=base + timedelta(hours=1)
+        )
+
+        mock_task_serializer.side_effect = lambda instance, *a, **k: SimpleNamespace(
+            data={"id": str(instance.id), "state": StateChoices.EXECUTING}
+        )
+
+        url = reverse("scan-report", kwargs={"pk": scan.id})
+        response = authenticated_client.get(url)
+
+        assert response.status_code == status.HTTP_202_ACCEPTED
+        assert str(new_task.id) in response["Content-Location"]
+        assert str(old_task.id) not in response["Content-Location"]
+
    @patch("api.v1.views.get_s3_client")
    @patch("api.v1.views.sentry_sdk.capture_exception")
    def test_compliance_list_objects_client_error(
@@ -6916,6 +7057,80 @@ class TestFindingViewSet:
            == findings_fixture[0].status
        )

+    def test_findings_list_resource_tags_no_n_plus_one(
+        self, authenticated_client, findings_fixture
+    ):
+        """Listing findings must load every resource's tags in a constant
+        number of queries, no matter how many findings/resources are returned.
+
+        This guards ``FindingViewSet._optimize_tags_loading`` against
+        regressions that would reintroduce one extra query per resource (the
+        N+1 the prefetch was added to remove).
+        """
+        scan = findings_fixture[0].scan
+        tenant_id = findings_fixture[0].tenant_id
+        provider = scan.provider
+
+        def _create_finding_with_tagged_resource(index):
+            resource = Resource.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant_id,
+                provider=provider,
+                uid=f"arn:aws:ec2:us-east-1:123456789012:instance/n-plus-one-{index}",
+                name=f"N+1 Instance {index}",
+                region="us-east-1",
+                service="ec2",
+                type="prowler-test",
+            )
+            resource.upsert_or_delete_tags(
+                [
+                    ResourceTag.objects.create(
+                        tenant_id=tenant_id,
+                        key=f"key-{index}",
+                        value=f"value-{index}",
+                    )
+                ]
+            )
+            finding = Finding.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant_id,
+                uid=f"n_plus_one_finding_{index}",
+                scan=scan,
+                status=Status.FAIL,
+                status_extended="n+1 status",
+                impact=Severity.medium,
+                severity=Severity.medium,
+                check_id="test_check_id",
+                check_metadata={"CheckId": "test_check_id", "servicename": "ec2"},
+                first_seen_at="2024-01-02T00:00:00Z",
+            )
+            finding.add_resources([resource])
+            return finding
+
+        params = {"filter[inserted_at]": TODAY, "include": "resources"}
+
+        # Baseline: the two findings provided by the fixture.
+        with CaptureQueriesContext(connection) as baseline:
+            response = authenticated_client.get(reverse("finding-list"), params)
+        assert response.status_code == status.HTTP_200_OK
+
+        # Add more findings, each with its own resource carrying tags.
+        extra_findings = 5
+        for index in range(extra_findings):
+            _create_finding_with_tagged_resource(index)
+
+        with CaptureQueriesContext(connection) as scaled:
+            response = authenticated_client.get(reverse("finding-list"), params)
+        assert response.status_code == status.HTTP_200_OK
+        assert len(response.json()["data"]) == len(findings_fixture) + extra_findings
+
+        # The query count must not grow with the number of findings/resources.
+        assert len(scaled.captured_queries) == len(baseline.captured_queries), (
+            "Resource tags are not being prefetched: "
+            f"{len(baseline.captured_queries)} queries for {len(findings_fixture)} "
+            f"findings vs {len(scaled.captured_queries)} for "
+            f"{len(findings_fixture) + extra_findings}. Likely an N+1 regression "
+            "in FindingViewSet._optimize_tags_loading."
+        )
+
    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
        "include_values, expected_resources",
        [
@@ -9345,6 +9560,16 @@ class TestComplianceOverviewViewSet:
            assert "platforms" in attributes["attributes"]["technique_details"]
            assert "technique_url" in attributes["attributes"]["technique_details"]

+            # Guard against the `_raw_attributes` wrapper leaking through —
+            # the UI reads metadata[i].Category / .AWSService directly.
+            metadata = attributes["attributes"]["metadata"]
+            assert isinstance(metadata, list) and len(metadata) > 0
+            first_attr = metadata[0]
+            assert isinstance(first_attr, dict)
+            assert "_raw_attributes" not in first_attr
+            assert "Category" in first_attr
+            assert "AWSService" in first_attr
+
    def test_compliance_overview_attributes_missing_compliance_id(
        self, authenticated_client
    ):
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ from api.base_views import BaseRLSViewSet, BaseTenantViewset, BaseUserViewset
 from api.compliance import (
    PROWLER_COMPLIANCE_OVERVIEW_TEMPLATE,
    get_compliance_frameworks,
+    get_prowler_provider_compliance,
 )
 from api.constants import SEVERITY_ORDER
 from api.db_router import MainRouter
@@ -1849,7 +1850,42 @@ class ProviderViewSet(DisablePaginationMixin, BaseRLSViewSet):
            200: OpenApiResponse(
                description="CSV file containing the compliance report"
            ),
-            404: OpenApiResponse(description="Compliance report not found"),
+            202: OpenApiResponse(description="The task is in progress"),
+            403: OpenApiResponse(description="There is a problem with credentials"),
+            404: OpenApiResponse(
+                description="Compliance report not found, or the scan has no reports yet"
+            ),
+        },
+        request=None,
+    ),
+    compliance_ocsf=extend_schema(
+        tags=["Scan"],
+        summary="Retrieve compliance report as OCSF JSON",
+        description=(
+            "Download a specific compliance report as an OCSF JSON file. "
+            "Only universal frameworks that declare an output configuration "
+            "produce this artifact (currently 'dora' and 'csa_ccm_4.0'); any "
+            "other framework returns 404."
+        ),
+        parameters=[
+            OpenApiParameter(
+                name="name",
+                type=str,
+                location=OpenApiParameter.PATH,
+                required=True,
+                description="The compliance report name, like 'dora'",
+            ),
+        ],
+        responses={
+            200: OpenApiResponse(
+                description="OCSF JSON file containing the compliance report"
+            ),
+            202: OpenApiResponse(description="The task is in progress"),
+            403: OpenApiResponse(description="There is a problem with credentials"),
+            404: OpenApiResponse(
+                description="Compliance report not found, the framework does "
+                "not provide an OCSF export, or the scan has no reports yet"
+            ),
        },
        request=None,
    ),
@@ -1992,35 +2028,23 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
        return queryset.select_related("provider", "task")

    def get_serializer_class(self):
-        if self.action == "create":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-            return ScanCreateSerializer
-        elif self.action == "partial_update":
+        if self.action == "partial_update":
            return ScanUpdateSerializer
-        elif self.action == "report":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-            return ScanReportSerializer
-        elif self.action == "compliance":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-            return ScanComplianceReportSerializer
-        elif self.action == "threatscore":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-        elif self.action == "ens":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-        elif self.action == "nis2":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-        elif self.action == "csa":
-            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
-                return self.response_serializer_class
-        elif self.action == "cis":
+
+        action_defaults = {
+            "create": ScanCreateSerializer,
+            "report": ScanReportSerializer,
+            "compliance": ScanComplianceReportSerializer,
+            "compliance_ocsf": ScanComplianceReportSerializer,
+        }
+        response_only_actions = {"threatscore", "ens", "nis2", "csa", "cis"}
+
+        if self.action in action_defaults or self.action in response_only_actions:
            if hasattr(self, "response_serializer_class"):
                return self.response_serializer_class
+            if self.action in action_defaults:
+                return action_defaults[self.action]
+
        return super().get_serializer_class()

    def partial_update(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
@@ -2059,12 +2083,17 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
        if scan_instance.state == StateChoices.EXECUTING and scan_instance.task:
            task = scan_instance.task
        else:
-            try:
-                task = Task.objects.get(
+            # A scan can have several `scan-report` tasks (e.g. re-runs); take the
+            # most recent one. `.first()` also avoids `MultipleObjectsReturned`.
+            task = (
+                Task.objects.filter(
                    task_runner_task__task_name="scan-report",
                    task_runner_task__task_kwargs__contains=str(scan_instance.id),
                )
-            except Task.DoesNotExist:
+                .order_by("-inserted_at")
+                .first()
+            )
+            if task is None:
                return None

        self.response_serializer_class = TaskSerializer
@@ -2139,27 +2168,32 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
                        status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY,
                    )
                contents = resp.get("Contents", [])
-                keys = []
+                matches = []
                for obj in contents:
                    key = obj["Key"]
                    key_basename = os.path.basename(key)
                    if any(ch in suffix for ch in ("*", "?", "[")):
                        if fnmatch.fnmatch(key_basename, suffix):
-                            keys.append(key)
+                            matches.append(obj)
                    elif key_basename == suffix:
-                        keys.append(key)
+                        matches.append(obj)
                    elif key.endswith(suffix):
                        # Backward compatibility if suffix already includes directories
-                        keys.append(key)
-                if not keys:
+                        matches.append(obj)
+                if not matches:
                    return Response(
                        {
                            "detail": f"No compliance file found for name '{os.path.splitext(suffix)[0]}'."
                        },
                        status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
                    )
-                # path_pattern here is prefix, but in compliance we build correct suffix check before
-                key = keys[0]
+                # Return the most recently modified match (latest report) when
+                # several files share the prefix/suffix. `list_objects_v2` always
+                # returns `LastModified`; the fallback keeps ordering deterministic
+                # if it is ever absent.
+                key = max(matches, key=lambda o: (o.get("LastModified", ""), o["Key"]))[
+                    "Key"
+                ]
            else:
                # path_pattern is exact key; HEAD before presigning to preserve the 404 contract.
                key = path_pattern
@@ -2209,7 +2243,9 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
                    },
                    status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
                )
-            filepath = files[0]
+            # Return the most recently modified match (latest report) when the
+            # pattern resolves to several files.
+            filepath = max(files, key=os.path.getmtime)
            with open(filepath, "rb") as f:
                content = f.read()
            filename = os.path.basename(filepath)
@@ -2257,20 +2293,16 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
        content, filename = loader
        return self._serve_file(content, filename, "application/x-zip-compressed")

-    @action(
-        detail=True,
-        methods=["get"],
-        url_path="compliance/(?P<name>[^/]+)",
-        url_name="compliance",
-    )
-    def compliance(self, request, pk=None, name=None):
-        scan = self.get_object()
-        if name not in get_compliance_frameworks(scan.provider.provider):
-            return Response(
-                {"detail": f"Compliance '{name}' not found."},
-                status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
-            )
+    def _serve_compliance_artifact(self, scan, name, file_extension, content_type):
+        """Resolve and serve a per-framework compliance artifact from disk/S3.

+        Shared by the CSV and OCSF compliance download actions. Both are
+        path-based (no query params) on purpose: ``get_object`` runs
+        ``filter_queryset``, which triggers JSON:API's
+        ``QueryParameterValidationFilter`` and 400s on any non-JSON:API
+        query param, so a ``?format=`` / ``?type=`` selector is not viable
+        here — the format is encoded in the route instead.
+        """
        running_resp = self._get_task_status(scan)
        if running_resp:
            return running_resp
@@ -2287,25 +2319,66 @@ class ScanViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):
            bucket = env.str("DJANGO_OUTPUT_S3_AWS_OUTPUT_BUCKET", "")
            key_prefix = scan.output_location.removeprefix(f"s3://{bucket}/")
            prefix = os.path.join(
-                os.path.dirname(key_prefix), "compliance", f"{name}.csv"
+                os.path.dirname(key_prefix), "compliance", f"{name}.{file_extension}"
            )
            loader = self._load_file(
                prefix,
                s3=True,
                bucket=bucket,
                list_objects=True,
-                content_type="text/csv",
+                content_type=content_type,
            )
        else:
            base = os.path.dirname(scan.output_location)
-            pattern = os.path.join(base, "compliance", f"*_{name}.csv")
+            pattern = os.path.join(base, "compliance", f"*_{name}.{file_extension}")
            loader = self._load_file(pattern, s3=False)

        if isinstance(loader, HttpResponseBase):
            return loader

        content, filename = loader
-        return self._serve_file(content, filename, "text/csv")
+        return self._serve_file(content, filename, content_type)
+
+    @action(
+        detail=True,
+        methods=["get"],
+        url_path="compliance/(?P<name>[^/]+)",
+        url_name="compliance",
+    )
+    def compliance(self, request, pk=None, name=None):
+        scan = self.get_object()
+        if name not in get_compliance_frameworks(scan.provider.provider):
+            return Response(
+                {"detail": f"Compliance '{name}' not found."},
+                status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
+            )
+        return self._serve_compliance_artifact(scan, name, "csv", "text/csv")
+
+    @action(
+        detail=True,
+        methods=["get"],
+        url_path="compliance/(?P<name>[^/]+)/ocsf",
+        url_name="compliance-ocsf",
+    )
+    def compliance_ocsf(self, request, pk=None, name=None):
+        scan = self.get_object()
+        if name not in get_compliance_frameworks(scan.provider.provider):
+            return Response(
+                {"detail": f"Compliance '{name}' not found."},
+                status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
+            )
+
+        universal_bulk = get_prowler_provider_compliance(scan.provider.provider)
+        framework_obj = universal_bulk.get(name)
+        if not (framework_obj and getattr(framework_obj, "outputs", None)):
+            return Response(
+                {"detail": f"Compliance '{name}' does not provide an OCSF export."},
+                status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND,
+            )
+
+        return self._serve_compliance_artifact(
+            scan, name, "ocsf.json", "application/json"
+        )

    @action(
        detail=True,
@@ -3749,6 +3822,16 @@ class FindingViewSet(PaginateByPkMixin, BaseRLSViewSet):
            return queryset
        return super().filter_queryset(queryset)

+    def _optimize_tags_loading(self, queryset):
+        """Prefetch resource tags to avoid N+1 queries when serializing findings"""
+        return queryset.prefetch_related(
+            Prefetch(
+                "resources__tags",
+                queryset=ResourceTag.objects.filter(tenant_id=self.request.tenant_id),
+                to_attr="prefetched_tags",
+            )
+        )
+
    def list(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        filtered_queryset = self.filter_queryset(self.get_queryset())
        return self.paginate_by_pk(
@@ -7484,14 +7567,17 @@ class FindingGroupViewSet(BaseRLSViewSet):

    def _get_latest_findings_per_provider(self, filtered_queryset):
        """Keep only findings from each provider's most recent completed scan."""
-        latest_scan_ids = (
+        # Materialize to a literal IN list. Left as a subquery, Postgres can't
+        # estimate the match count and picks a serial nested loop on
+        # resource_finding_mappings when one scan dominates findings
+        latest_scan_ids = list(
            Scan.objects.filter(
                tenant_id=self.request.tenant_id,
                state=StateChoices.COMPLETED,
            )
            .order_by("provider_id", "-completed_at", "-inserted_at")
            .distinct("provider_id")
-            .values("id")
+            .values_list("id", flat=True)
        )
        return filtered_queryset.filter(scan_id__in=latest_scan_ids)

@@ -26,6 +26,61 @@ celery_app.conf.result_backend_transport_options = {
 }
 celery_app.conf.visibility_timeout = BROKER_VISIBILITY_TIMEOUT

+# Durable delivery: keep the message until the task finishes, so a worker killed
+# mid-task (deploy/OOM/eviction) does not silently drop it. Reserve one task at a
+# time so a crash exposes at most one extra reserved message.
+celery_app.conf.task_acks_late = True
+celery_app.conf.task_reject_on_worker_lost = True
+celery_app.conf.worker_prefetch_multiplier = env.int(
+    "DJANGO_CELERY_WORKER_PREFETCH_MULTIPLIER", default=1
+)
+# On SIGTERM, give the worker time to finish or re-queue in-flight tasks before
+# it is forcefully killed (Celery 5.5+ soft shutdown).
+celery_app.conf.worker_soft_shutdown_timeout = env.int(
+    "DJANGO_CELERY_WORKER_SOFT_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT", default=60
+)
+# Bound execution so a blocked task cannot pin a worker forever. Connection
+# checks get a tight limit; scans and provider/tenant deletions can legitimately
+# run for more than a day on large tenants, so they get a much higher cap.
+# The default for every other task is set as the global limit, not as a "*"
+# annotation: Celery applies the "*" entry AFTER the per-task one, so a "*" in
+# task_annotations would silently overwrite every specific limit defined below.
+_TASK_HARD_LIMIT = env.int("DJANGO_CELERY_TASK_TIME_LIMIT", default=6 * 60 * 60)
+_TASK_SOFT_LIMIT = env.int(
+    "DJANGO_CELERY_TASK_SOFT_TIME_LIMIT", default=_TASK_HARD_LIMIT - 600
+)
+_LONG_TASK_HARD_LIMIT = env.int(
+    "DJANGO_CELERY_LONG_TASK_TIME_LIMIT", default=48 * 60 * 60
+)
+_LONG_TASK_SOFT_LIMIT = env.int(
+    "DJANGO_CELERY_LONG_TASK_SOFT_TIME_LIMIT", default=_LONG_TASK_HARD_LIMIT - 600
+)
+celery_app.conf.task_time_limit = _TASK_HARD_LIMIT
+celery_app.conf.task_soft_time_limit = _TASK_SOFT_LIMIT
+celery_app.conf.task_annotations = {
+    **{
+        name: {"soft_time_limit": 60, "time_limit": 120}
+        for name in (
+            "provider-connection-check",
+            "integration-connection-check",
+            "lighthouse-connection-check",
+            "lighthouse-provider-connection-check",
+        )
+    },
+    **{
+        name: {
+            "soft_time_limit": _LONG_TASK_SOFT_LIMIT,
+            "time_limit": _LONG_TASK_HARD_LIMIT,
+        }
+        for name in (
+            "scan-perform",
+            "scan-perform-scheduled",
+            "provider-deletion",
+            "tenant-deletion",
+        )
+    },
+}
+
 celery_app.autodiscover_tasks(["api"])


@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone

-from celery import current_app, states
+from celery import states
 from celery.utils.log import get_task_logger
 from config.django.base import ATTACK_PATHS_SCAN_STALE_THRESHOLD_MINUTES
 from tasks.jobs.attack_paths.db_utils import (
    _mark_scan_finished,
    recover_graph_data_ready,
 )
+from tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery import is_worker_alive as _is_worker_alive
+from tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery import revoke_task as _revoke_task

 from api.attack_paths import database as graph_database
 from api.db_router import MainRouter
@@ -150,32 +152,6 @@ def _cleanup_stale_scheduled_scans(cutoff: datetime) -> list[str]:
    return cleaned_up


-def _is_worker_alive(worker: str) -> bool:
-    """Ping a specific Celery worker. Returns `True` if it responds or on error."""
-    try:
-        response = current_app.control.inspect(destination=[worker], timeout=1.0).ping()
-        return response is not None and worker in response
-    except Exception:
-        logger.exception(f"Failed to ping worker {worker}, treating as alive")
-        return True
-
-
-def _revoke_task(task_result, terminate: bool = True) -> None:
-    """Revoke a Celery task. Non-fatal on failure.
-
-    `terminate=True` SIGTERMs the worker if the task is mid-execution; use
-    for EXECUTING cleanup. `terminate=False` only marks the task id revoked
-    across workers, so any worker pulling the queued message discards it;
-    use for SCHEDULED cleanup where the task hasn't run yet.
-    """
-    try:
-        kwargs = {"terminate": True, "signal": "SIGTERM"} if terminate else {}
-        current_app.control.revoke(task_result.task_id, **kwargs)
-        logger.info(f"Revoked task {task_result.task_id}")
-    except Exception:
-        logger.exception(f"Failed to revoke task {task_result.task_id}")
-
-
 def _cleanup_scan(scan, task_result, reason: str) -> bool:
    """
    Clean up a single stale `AttackPathsScan`:
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ from api.db_utils import batch_delete, rls_transaction
 from api.models import (
    AttackPathsScan,
    Finding,
+    JiraIssueDispatch,
    Provider,
    ProviderComplianceScore,
    Resource,
@@ -80,6 +81,14 @@ def delete_provider(tenant_id: str, pk: str):

        deletion_steps = [
            ("Scan Summaries", ScanSummary.all_objects.filter(scan__provider=instance)),
+            (
+                "Jira Issue Dispatches",
+                JiraIssueDispatch.objects.filter(
+                    finding_id__in=Finding.all_objects.filter(
+                        scan__provider=instance
+                    ).values_list("id", flat=True)
+                ),
+            ),
            ("Findings", Finding.all_objects.filter(scan__provider=instance)),
            ("Resources", Resource.all_objects.filter(provider=instance)),
            ("Scans", Scan.all_objects.filter(provider=instance)),
@@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.cis.cis_oraclecloud import OracleCloudCIS
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.cisa_scuba.cisa_scuba_googleworkspace import (
    GoogleWorkspaceCISASCuBA,
 )
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_alibabacloud import AlibabaCloudCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_aws import AWSCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_azure import AzureCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_gcp import GCPCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_oraclecloud import OracleCloudCSA
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_aws import AWSENS
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_azure import AzureENS
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_gcp import GCPENS
@@ -102,7 +97,6 @@ COMPLIANCE_CLASS_MAP = {
        (lambda name: name == "prowler_threatscore_aws", ProwlerThreatScoreAWS),
        (lambda name: name.startswith("ccc_"), CCC_AWS),
        (lambda name: name.startswith("c5_"), AWSC5),
-        (lambda name: name.startswith("csa_"), AWSCSA),
        (lambda name: name == "asd_essential_eight_aws", ASDEssentialEightAWS),
    ],
    "azure": [
@@ -113,7 +107,6 @@ COMPLIANCE_CLASS_MAP = {
        (lambda name: name.startswith("ccc_"), CCC_Azure),
        (lambda name: name == "prowler_threatscore_azure", ProwlerThreatScoreAzure),
        (lambda name: name == "c5_azure", AzureC5),
-        (lambda name: name.startswith("csa_"), AzureCSA),
    ],
    "gcp": [
        (lambda name: name.startswith("cis_"), GCPCIS),
@@ -123,7 +116,6 @@ COMPLIANCE_CLASS_MAP = {
        (lambda name: name == "prowler_threatscore_gcp", ProwlerThreatScoreGCP),
        (lambda name: name.startswith("ccc_"), CCC_GCP),
        (lambda name: name == "c5_gcp", GCPC5),
-        (lambda name: name.startswith("csa_"), GCPCSA),
    ],
    "kubernetes": [
        (lambda name: name.startswith("cis_"), KubernetesCIS),
@@ -152,11 +144,9 @@ COMPLIANCE_CLASS_MAP = {
    "image": [],
    "oraclecloud": [
        (lambda name: name.startswith("cis_"), OracleCloudCIS),
-        (lambda name: name.startswith("csa_"), OracleCloudCSA),
    ],
    "alibabacloud": [
        (lambda name: name.startswith("cis_"), AlibabaCloudCIS),
-        (lambda name: name.startswith("csa_"), AlibabaCloudCSA),
        (
            lambda name: name == "prowler_threatscore_alibabacloud",
            ProwlerThreatScoreAlibaba,
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ from tasks.utils import batched

 from api.db_router import READ_REPLICA_ALIAS, MainRouter
 from api.db_utils import REPLICA_MAX_ATTEMPTS, REPLICA_RETRY_BASE_DELAY, rls_transaction
-from api.models import Finding, Integration, Provider
+from api.models import Finding, Integration, JiraIssueDispatch, Provider
 from api.utils import initialize_prowler_integration, initialize_prowler_provider
 from prowler.lib.outputs.asff.asff import ASFF
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.generic.generic import GenericCompliance
@@ -482,66 +482,115 @@ def send_findings_to_jira(
    with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
        integration = Integration.objects.get(id=integration_id)
        jira_integration = initialize_prowler_integration(integration)
+        # Idempotency: findings already ticketed for this integration must not be
+        # sent again on a re-run (e.g. orphan recovery), to avoid duplicate issues
+        already_sent = {
+            str(fid)
+            for fid in JiraIssueDispatch.objects.filter(
+                integration_id=integration_id, finding_id__in=finding_ids
+            ).values_list("finding_id", flat=True)
+        }

    num_tickets_created = 0
+    skipped_count = 0
    for finding_id in finding_ids:
+        if str(finding_id) in already_sent:
+            skipped_count += 1
+            continue
+
+        # Reserve the finding BEFORE the external call. The unique constraint on
+        # (tenant, integration, finding) makes the dispatch row the single source of
+        # truth, so a concurrent run or a retry that raced past the bulk pre-check
+        # cannot create a duplicate issue: created=False means another run already
+        # claimed it. The reservation is released below if the send does not succeed.
        with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
-            finding_instance = (
-                Finding.all_objects.select_related("scan__provider")
-                .prefetch_related("resources")
-                .get(id=finding_id)
+            _, created = JiraIssueDispatch.objects.get_or_create(
+                tenant_id=tenant_id,
+                integration_id=integration_id,
+                finding_id=finding_id,
            )
+        if not created:
+            skipped_count += 1
+            continue

-            # Extract resource information
-            resource = (
-                finding_instance.resources.first()
-                if finding_instance.resources.exists()
-                else None
-            )
-            resource_uid = resource.uid if resource else ""
-            resource_name = resource.name if resource else ""
-            resource_tags = {}
-            if resource and hasattr(resource, "tags"):
-                resource_tags = resource.get_tags(tenant_id)
+        sent = False
+        try:
+            with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+                finding_instance = (
+                    Finding.all_objects.select_related("scan__provider")
+                    .prefetch_related("resources")
+                    .get(id=finding_id)
+                )

-            # Get region
-            region = resource.region if resource and resource.region else ""
+                # Extract resource information
+                resource = (
+                    finding_instance.resources.first()
+                    if finding_instance.resources.exists()
+                    else None
+                )
+                resource_uid = resource.uid if resource else ""
+                resource_name = resource.name if resource else ""
+                resource_tags = {}
+                if resource and hasattr(resource, "tags"):
+                    resource_tags = resource.get_tags(tenant_id)

-            # Extract remediation information from check_metadata
-            check_metadata = finding_instance.check_metadata
-            remediation = check_metadata.get("remediation", {})
-            recommendation = remediation.get("recommendation", {})
-            remediation_code = remediation.get("code", {})
+                # Get region
+                region = resource.region if resource and resource.region else ""

-            # Send the individual finding to Jira
-            result = jira_integration.send_finding(
-                check_id=finding_instance.check_id,
-                check_title=check_metadata.get("checktitle", ""),
-                severity=finding_instance.severity,
-                status=finding_instance.status,
-                status_extended=finding_instance.status_extended or "",
-                provider=finding_instance.scan.provider.provider,
-                region=region,
-                resource_uid=resource_uid,
-                resource_name=resource_name,
-                risk=check_metadata.get("risk", ""),
-                recommendation_text=recommendation.get("text", ""),
-                recommendation_url=recommendation.get("url", ""),
-                remediation_code_native_iac=remediation_code.get("nativeiac", ""),
-                remediation_code_terraform=remediation_code.get("terraform", ""),
-                remediation_code_cli=remediation_code.get("cli", ""),
-                remediation_code_other=remediation_code.get("other", ""),
-                resource_tags=resource_tags,
-                compliance=finding_instance.compliance or {},
-                project_key=project_key,
-                issue_type=issue_type,
-            )
-            if result:
-                num_tickets_created += 1
-            else:
-                logger.error(f"Failed to send finding {finding_id} to Jira")
+                # Extract remediation information from check_metadata
+                check_metadata = finding_instance.check_metadata
+                remediation = check_metadata.get("remediation", {})
+                recommendation = remediation.get("recommendation", {})
+                remediation_code = remediation.get("code", {})
+
+                # Send the individual finding to Jira
+                sent = bool(
+                    jira_integration.send_finding(
+                        check_id=finding_instance.check_id,
+                        check_title=check_metadata.get("checktitle", ""),
+                        severity=finding_instance.severity,
+                        status=finding_instance.status,
+                        status_extended=finding_instance.status_extended or "",
+                        provider=finding_instance.scan.provider.provider,
+                        region=region,
+                        resource_uid=resource_uid,
+                        resource_name=resource_name,
+                        risk=check_metadata.get("risk", ""),
+                        recommendation_text=recommendation.get("text", ""),
+                        recommendation_url=recommendation.get("url", ""),
+                        remediation_code_native_iac=remediation_code.get(
+                            "nativeiac", ""
+                        ),
+                        remediation_code_terraform=remediation_code.get(
+                            "terraform", ""
+                        ),
+                        remediation_code_cli=remediation_code.get("cli", ""),
+                        remediation_code_other=remediation_code.get("other", ""),
+                        resource_tags=resource_tags,
+                        compliance=finding_instance.compliance or {},
+                        project_key=project_key,
+                        issue_type=issue_type,
+                    )
+                )
+        finally:
+            if not sent:
+                # Release the reservation so a later run can retry this finding: it
+                # was not ticketed (send failed or raised), so the row must not block
+                # a future legitimate send.
+                with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+                    JiraIssueDispatch.objects.filter(
+                        tenant_id=tenant_id,
+                        integration_id=integration_id,
+                        finding_id=finding_id,
+                    ).delete()
+
+        if sent:
+            num_tickets_created += 1
+        else:
+            logger.error(f"Failed to send finding {finding_id} to Jira")

    return {
        "created_count": num_tickets_created,
-        "failed_count": len(finding_ids) - num_tickets_created,
+        "failed_count": len(finding_ids) - num_tickets_created - skipped_count,
+        "skipped_count": skipped_count,
    }
@@ -0,0 +1,397 @@
+"""Detect and recover orphaned Celery tasks.
+
+A task is "orphaned" when its result row is non-terminal (STARTED/RECEIVED) but the
+worker that was running it is gone (deploy, OOM, eviction). We tell a real orphan
+from a still-running task by pinging the worker recorded on its `TaskResult`:
+
+- worker responds  -> the task is in flight, leave it alone (never double-run);
+- worker is gone   -> real orphan: mark the stale result terminal (so pending/started
+  alerts clear), then re-enqueue the task from its stored name + kwargs.
+
+This recovers only allowlisted tasks with local, proven idempotency. Celery's
+`result_extended=True` gives us the stored `task_name`/`task_kwargs`/`worker` once
+the task starts, but external side-effect tasks are failed instead of blindly
+re-run. A small recovery cap stops a task that repeatedly kills its worker from
+looping forever.
+
+This is the shared engine behind both the periodic Beat watchdog and the
+`reconcile_orphan_tasks` management command.
+"""
+
+import ast
+import json
+from contextlib import contextmanager
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from uuid import uuid4
+
+from celery import current_app, states
+from celery.utils.log import get_task_logger
+from django.db import connections
+
+logger = get_task_logger(__name__)
+
+# Arbitrary constant key for pg_try_advisory_lock so only one reconciliation
+# runs at a time across replicas / the watchdog / the command.
+ORPHAN_RECOVERY_LOCK_KEY = 0x70726F77  # "prow"
+
+# Non-terminal states that mean "a worker had this and may have died with it".
+IN_FLIGHT_STATES = (states.STARTED, states.RECEIVED)
+
+# Scan tasks are recovered by re-running scan-perform on the EXISTING scan row,
+# not by re-enqueuing the original task: re-enqueuing scan-perform-scheduled would
+# hit its "a scan is already executing" guard and no-op, leaving the scan stuck.
+_SCAN_TASKS = ("scan-perform", "scan-perform-scheduled")
+
+# Tasks with proven idempotency are auto re-enqueued. Scans/summaries clear and
+# rewrite their own rows. integration-jira is safe too: each finding is reserved in
+# JiraIssueDispatch before the external call, so a re-run skips already-ticketed
+# findings (worst case one finding missed on a mid-send crash, never a duplicate).
+# Other external side effects stay terminal: integration-s3 rebuilds its upload from
+# worker-local files that do not survive a crash, and report/Security Hub recovery is
+# out of scope.
+REENQUEUEABLE_TASKS = {
+    *_SCAN_TASKS,
+    "provider-deletion",
+    "tenant-deletion",
+    "scan-summary",
+    "scan-compliance-overviews",
+    "scan-provider-compliance-scores",
+    "scan-daily-severity",
+    "scan-finding-group-summaries",
+    "scan-reset-ephemeral-resources",
+    "integration-jira",
+}
+
+# Tasks excluded from generic recovery: attack-paths scans are handled by their own
+# stale-cleanup (which also drops the temp Neo4j db), and the maintenance tasks must
+# not self-recover (they run again on their own schedule).
+_SKIP_RECOVERY = {
+    "attack-paths-scan-perform",
+    "attack-paths-cleanup-stale-scans",
+    "reconcile-orphan-tasks",
+}
+
+
+@contextmanager
+def advisory_lock(key: int = ORPHAN_RECOVERY_LOCK_KEY, using: str = "default"):
+    """Yield True if this session won a Postgres advisory lock, else False.
+
+    Non-blocking: losers get False and should no-op. The lock is released on
+    exit (and implicitly if the session dies).
+    """
+    with connections[using].cursor() as cursor:
+        cursor.execute("SELECT pg_try_advisory_lock(%s)", [key])
+        acquired = bool(cursor.fetchone()[0])
+        try:
+            yield acquired
+        finally:
+            if acquired:
+                cursor.execute("SELECT pg_advisory_unlock(%s)", [key])
+
+
+def is_worker_alive(worker: str, timeout: float = 1.0) -> bool:
+    """Ping a specific Celery worker. Returns True if it responds, or on error.
+
+    Erring on the side of "alive" means an unreachable control bus never causes
+    a still-running task to be re-enqueued.
+    """
+    try:
+        response = current_app.control.inspect(
+            destination=[worker], timeout=timeout
+        ).ping()
+        return response is not None and worker in response
+    except Exception:
+        logger.exception(f"Failed to ping worker {worker}, treating as alive")
+        return True
+
+
+def revoke_task(task_result, terminate: bool = True) -> None:
+    """Revoke a Celery task by its TaskResult. Non-fatal on failure.
+
+    terminate=True SIGTERMs the worker if the task is mid-execution; terminate=False
+    only marks the id revoked so any worker pulling the queued message discards it
+    (use before re-enqueuing, so a later broker redelivery of the stale message is
+    dropped).
+    """
+    try:
+        kwargs = {"terminate": True, "signal": "SIGTERM"} if terminate else {}
+        current_app.control.revoke(task_result.task_id, **kwargs)
+        logger.info(f"Revoked task {task_result.task_id}")
+    except Exception:
+        logger.exception(f"Failed to revoke task {task_result.task_id}")
+
+
+def _decode_celery_field(value, default):
+    """Decode django-celery-results' stored task_args/task_kwargs to a Python object.
+
+    The backend stores them as a (sometimes double-encoded) repr/JSON string. An
+    empty or missing field returns ``default``; a non-empty value that cannot be
+    decoded raises ``ValueError`` so the caller can avoid re-enqueuing a task with
+    the wrong arguments.
+    """
+    obj = value
+    for _ in range(2):  # values can be double-encoded (a string holding a repr)
+        if not isinstance(obj, str):
+            break
+        text = obj.strip()
+        if not text:
+            return default
+        parsed = None
+        for parser in (ast.literal_eval, json.loads):
+            try:
+                parsed = parser(text)
+                break
+            except (ValueError, SyntaxError, TypeError):
+                continue
+        if parsed is None:
+            raise ValueError(f"undecodable celery field: {text[:120]!r}")
+        obj = parsed
+    return default if obj is None else obj
+
+
+def reconcile_orphans(
+    grace_minutes: int = 2,
+    max_attempts: int = 3,
+    window_hours: int = 6,
+    dry_run: bool = False,
+) -> dict:
+    """Run the full orphan sweep under a single-flight advisory lock.
+
+    Recovers any orphaned in-flight task and delegates attack-paths scans that
+    never reached a worker to their existing stale-cleanup. Returns a summary;
+    a no-op (lock not won) is reported too.
+    """
+    with advisory_lock() as acquired:
+        if not acquired:
+            logger.info("Orphan reconcile skipped: another run holds the lock")
+            return {"acquired": False}
+
+        # Populate the task registry so we can re-enqueue any task by name.
+        import tasks.tasks  # noqa: F401
+
+        result = _reconcile_task_results(
+            grace_minutes=grace_minutes,
+            max_attempts=max_attempts,
+            window_hours=window_hours,
+            dry_run=dry_run,
+        )
+
+        if not dry_run:
+            from tasks.jobs.attack_paths.cleanup import cleanup_stale_attack_paths_scans
+
+            result["attack_paths"] = cleanup_stale_attack_paths_scans()
+
+        return {"acquired": True, **result}
+
+
+def _reconcile_task_results(
+    grace_minutes: int, max_attempts: int, window_hours: int, dry_run: bool
+) -> dict:
+    from django_celery_results.models import TaskResult
+
+    cutoff = datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc) - timedelta(minutes=grace_minutes)
+    candidates = list(
+        TaskResult.objects.filter(status__in=IN_FLIGHT_STATES, date_created__lt=cutoff)
+        .exclude(worker__isnull=True)
+        .exclude(worker="")
+        .exclude(task_name__in=_SKIP_RECOVERY)
+    )
+
+    # Ping each distinct worker at most once.
+    worker_alive = {w: is_worker_alive(w) for w in {tr.worker for tr in candidates}}
+
+    recovered, failed, skipped = [], [], []
+    for task_result in candidates:
+        if worker_alive.get(task_result.worker, True):
+            skipped.append(task_result.task_id)  # in flight, do not double-run
+            continue
+        if dry_run:
+            recovered.append(task_result.task_id)
+            continue
+        outcome = _recover_task(task_result, max_attempts, window_hours)
+        (recovered if outcome == "recovered" else failed).append(task_result.task_id)
+
+    logger.info(
+        "Orphan reconcile: recovered=%d failed=%d skipped(in-flight)=%d",
+        len(recovered),
+        len(failed),
+        len(skipped),
+    )
+    return {"recovered": recovered, "failed": failed, "skipped": skipped}
+
+
+def _recovery_attempt_count(name: str, kwargs_repr, window_hours: int) -> int:
+    """Increment and return the recovery count for this (task, kwargs) within the
+    window. Backed by Valkey so it survives result-row churn (a worker processing
+    the revoke can blank the TaskResult fields). Fail-open if Valkey is down (the
+    broker being unreachable means nothing is running anyway).
+    """
+    import hashlib
+
+    from django.conf import settings
+
+    try:
+        import redis
+
+        client = redis.from_url(settings.CELERY_BROKER_URL)
+        signature = f"{name}|{kwargs_repr}".encode()
+        key = (
+            "orphan-recovery:"
+            + hashlib.sha1(signature, usedforsecurity=False).hexdigest()
+        )
+        count = client.incr(key)
+        if count == 1:
+            client.expire(key, max(1, window_hours) * 3600)
+        return int(count)
+    except Exception:
+        logger.exception("Recovery-attempt counter unavailable; allowing recovery")
+        return 1
+
+
+def _recover_task(task_result, max_attempts: int, window_hours: int) -> str:
+    """Recover one orphaned task. Returns 'recovered' or 'failed'."""
+    # Capture name/args/kwargs now: revoking can let a worker blank the row.
+    name = task_result.task_name
+    args_repr = task_result.task_args
+    kwargs_repr = task_result.task_kwargs
+    now = datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc)
+
+    # Drop any future broker redelivery of the stale message.
+    revoke_task(task_result, terminate=False)
+
+    # Mark the stale result terminal so "pending/started forever" alerts clear.
+    task_result.status = states.REVOKED
+    task_result.date_done = now
+    task_result.save(update_fields=["status", "date_done"])
+
+    attempt = _recovery_attempt_count(name, kwargs_repr, window_hours)
+    if name not in REENQUEUEABLE_TASKS or attempt > max_attempts:
+        reason = (
+            f"{name} is not allowlisted for auto recovery"
+            if name not in REENQUEUEABLE_TASKS
+            else f"recovery cap reached ({attempt}/{max_attempts})"
+        )
+        _fail_domain_row(task_result.task_id, name, now)
+        logger.warning(
+            "Orphan %s (%s) not re-enqueued: %s", task_result.task_id, name, reason
+        )
+        return "failed"
+
+    # Scan tasks: re-run the EXISTING scan row directly via scan-perform, so the
+    # scheduled-scan "already executing" guard cannot turn recovery into a no-op.
+    # Falls through to the generic path only if no scan is linked yet (e.g. a
+    # scheduled task that died before creating one), where re-running it creates one.
+    if name in _SCAN_TASKS:
+        scan = _scan_for_task(task_result.task_id)
+        if scan is not None:
+            if not _reenqueue_scan(task_result.task_id, scan):
+                return "failed"
+            logger.info(
+                "Re-enqueued orphaned scan %s (was task %s)",
+                scan.id,
+                task_result.task_id,
+            )
+            return "recovered"
+
+    task_obj = current_app.tasks.get(name)
+    if task_obj is None:
+        logger.error(
+            "Orphan %s: task %s not registered, cannot re-enqueue",
+            task_result.task_id,
+            name,
+        )
+        return "failed"
+
+    try:
+        args = _decode_celery_field(args_repr, [])
+        kwargs = _decode_celery_field(kwargs_repr, {})
+    except ValueError:
+        logger.error(
+            "Orphan %s (%s): could not decode stored args/kwargs, not re-enqueuing",
+            task_result.task_id,
+            name,
+        )
+        _fail_domain_row(task_result.task_id, name, now)
+        return "failed"
+    new_task_id = str(uuid4())
+    task_obj.apply_async(
+        args=list(args) if isinstance(args, (list, tuple)) else [],
+        kwargs=kwargs if isinstance(kwargs, dict) else {},
+        task_id=new_task_id,
+    )
+    logger.info(
+        "Re-enqueued orphan %s (%s) as %s", task_result.task_id, name, new_task_id
+    )
+    return "recovered"
+
+
+def _scan_for_task(task_id: str):
+    """Return the Scan linked to a Celery task id, or None (read across tenants)."""
+    from api.db_router import MainRouter
+    from api.models import Scan
+
+    return Scan.all_objects.using(MainRouter.admin_db).filter(task_id=task_id).first()
+
+
+def _reenqueue_scan(old_task_id: str, scan) -> bool:
+    """Re-run an orphaned scan via scan-perform on the existing row.
+
+    Pre-provisions the new task linkage (TaskResult + api.Task) and relinks the
+    Scan before enqueuing, so the FK is valid and a worker can never outrun the DB.
+    The relink is conditional on the scan still pointing at the old task, so a stale
+    orphan can never clobber a newer linkage.
+    """
+    from django_celery_results.models import TaskResult
+
+    from api.db_utils import rls_transaction
+    from api.models import Scan
+    from api.models import Task as APITask
+    from tasks.tasks import perform_scan_task
+
+    tenant_id = str(scan.tenant_id)
+    new_task_id = str(uuid4())
+    with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+        locked_scan = Scan.all_objects.select_for_update().filter(id=scan.id).first()
+        if locked_scan is None or str(locked_scan.task_id) != old_task_id:
+            logger.info(
+                "Scan %s no longer points at task %s; skipping recovery re-enqueue",
+                scan.id,
+                old_task_id,
+            )
+            return False
+        task_result_new, _ = TaskResult.objects.get_or_create(
+            task_id=new_task_id,
+            defaults={"status": states.PENDING, "task_name": "scan-perform"},
+        )
+        APITask.objects.update_or_create(
+            id=new_task_id,
+            tenant_id=tenant_id,
+            defaults={"task_runner_task": task_result_new},
+        )
+        locked_scan.task_id = new_task_id
+        locked_scan.recovery_count = (locked_scan.recovery_count or 0) + 1
+        locked_scan.save(update_fields=["task_id", "recovery_count", "updated_at"])
+
+    perform_scan_task.apply_async(
+        kwargs={
+            "tenant_id": tenant_id,
+            "scan_id": str(scan.id),
+            "provider_id": str(scan.provider_id),
+        },
+        task_id=new_task_id,
+    )
+    return True
+
+
+def _fail_domain_row(old_task_id: str, name: str, now: datetime) -> None:
+    """Mark a scan terminal when its task is capped/denylisted instead of re-run."""
+    from api.db_utils import rls_transaction
+    from api.models import Scan, StateChoices
+
+    if name in _SCAN_TASKS:
+        scan = _scan_for_task(old_task_id)
+        if scan is not None:
+            with rls_transaction(str(scan.tenant_id)):
+                Scan.all_objects.filter(id=scan.id, task_id=old_task_id).update(
+                    state=StateChoices.FAILED, completed_at=now
+                )
@@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ from api.db_router import READ_REPLICA_ALIAS, MainRouter
 from api.db_utils import rls_transaction
 from api.models import Provider, Scan, ScanSummary, StateChoices, ThreatScoreSnapshot
 from api.utils import initialize_prowler_provider
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
+from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import (
+    Compliance,
+    get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal,
+)
 from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding as FindingOutput

 logger = get_task_logger(__name__)
@@ -571,7 +574,7 @@ def generate_csa_report(
    Args:
        tenant_id: The tenant ID for Row-Level Security context.
        scan_id: ID of the scan executed by Prowler.
-        compliance_id: ID of the compliance framework (e.g., "csa_ccm_4.0_aws").
+        compliance_id: ID of the compliance framework (e.g., "csa_ccm_4.0").
        output_path: Output PDF file path.
        provider_id: Provider ID for the scan.
        only_failed: If True, only include failed requirements in detailed section.
@@ -883,9 +886,11 @@ def generate_compliance_reports(
            frameworks_bulk.get(f"nis2_{provider_type}")
        )
    if generate_csa:
-        pending_checks_by_framework["csa"] = _get_compliance_check_ids(
-            frameworks_bulk.get(f"csa_ccm_4.0_{provider_type}")
-        )
+        # csa_ccm_4.0 lives at the top level, not under compliance/{provider}/.
+        csa_framework = frameworks_bulk.get(
+            "csa_ccm_4.0"
+        ) or get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(provider_type).get("csa_ccm_4.0")
+        pending_checks_by_framework["csa"] = _get_compliance_check_ids(csa_framework)
    if generate_cis and latest_cis:
        pending_checks_by_framework["cis"] = _get_compliance_check_ids(
            frameworks_bulk.get(latest_cis)
@@ -1183,7 +1188,7 @@ def generate_compliance_reports(
    if generate_csa:
        generated_report_keys.append("csa")
        csa_path = output_paths["csa"]
-        compliance_id_csa = f"csa_ccm_4.0_{provider_type}"
+        compliance_id_csa = "csa_ccm_4.0"
        pdf_path_csa = f"{csa_path}_csa_report.pdf"
        logger.info("Generating CSA CCM report with compliance %s", compliance_id_csa)

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import time
 from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
 from contextlib import contextmanager
 from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+from types import SimpleNamespace
 from typing import Any

 from celery.utils.log import get_task_logger
@@ -26,7 +27,10 @@ from api.db_router import READ_REPLICA_ALIAS
 from api.db_utils import rls_transaction
 from api.models import Provider, StatusChoices
 from api.utils import initialize_prowler_provider
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
+from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import (
+    Compliance,
+    get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal,
+)
 from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding as FindingOutput

 from .components import (
@@ -222,6 +226,46 @@ def get_requirement_metadata(
    return None


+def _universal_attributes_to_list(attributes) -> list:
+    """Flatten a universal requirement's ``attributes`` into a list of objects
+    with attribute access. MITRE wraps its list under ``_raw_attributes``."""
+    if isinstance(attributes, dict) and "_raw_attributes" in attributes:
+        entries = attributes.get("_raw_attributes") or []
+        return [
+            SimpleNamespace(**entry) for entry in entries if isinstance(entry, dict)
+        ]
+    if isinstance(attributes, dict):
+        return [SimpleNamespace(**attributes)] if attributes else []
+    return list(attributes or [])
+
+
+def _adapt_universal_to_legacy(framework, provider_type: str) -> SimpleNamespace:
+    """Expose a universal ``ComplianceFramework`` under the legacy ``Compliance``
+    attribute names used by the PDF pipeline."""
+    provider_key = (provider_type or "").lower()
+    requirements = []
+    for requirement in framework.requirements:
+        checks_by_provider = (
+            requirement.checks if isinstance(requirement.checks, dict) else {}
+        )
+        requirements.append(
+            SimpleNamespace(
+                Id=requirement.id,
+                Description=requirement.description or "",
+                Checks=list(checks_by_provider.get(provider_key, [])),
+                Attributes=_universal_attributes_to_list(requirement.attributes),
+            )
+        )
+    return SimpleNamespace(
+        Framework=framework.framework,
+        Name=framework.name,
+        Version=framework.version or "",
+        Description=framework.description or "",
+        Provider=framework.provider or provider_type,
+        Requirements=requirements,
+    )
+
+
 # =============================================================================
 # PDF Styles Cache
 # =============================================================================
@@ -869,9 +913,18 @@ class BaseComplianceReportGenerator(ABC):
                prowler_provider = initialize_prowler_provider(provider_obj)
            provider_type = provider_obj.provider

-            # Load compliance framework
-            frameworks_bulk = Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type)
-            compliance_obj = frameworks_bulk.get(compliance_id)
+            # Load compliance framework — fall back to the universal loader
+            # for top-level JSONs (e.g. csa_ccm_4.0) that Compliance.get_bulk
+            # does not scan.
+            compliance_obj = Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type).get(compliance_id)
+            if not compliance_obj:
+                universal_framework = get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(
+                    provider_type
+                ).get(compliance_id)
+                if universal_framework:
+                    compliance_obj = _adapt_universal_to_legacy(
+                        universal_framework, provider_type
+                    )

            if not compliance_obj:
                raise ValueError(f"Compliance framework not found: {compliance_id}")
@@ -118,6 +118,19 @@ ATTACK_SURFACE_PROVIDER_COMPATIBILITY = {
 _ATTACK_SURFACE_MAPPING_CACHE: dict[str, dict] = {}


+def _clear_scan_rerun_state(tenant_id: str, scan_id: str) -> None:
+    """Remove rows derived from a previous execution of this scan."""
+    with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+        Finding.all_objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ResourceScanSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ScanCategorySummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ScanGroupSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ScanSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        AttackSurfaceOverview.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ComplianceRequirementOverview.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        ComplianceOverviewSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+
+
 def aggregate_category_counts(
    categories: list[str],
    severity: str,
@@ -476,9 +489,13 @@ def _create_compliance_summaries(
            )
        )

-    # Bulk insert summaries
-    if summary_objects:
-        with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+    # Idempotent re-run: clear this scan's prior summaries before re-inserting, so
+    # a recovered scan's summary always reflects its own (re-derived) requirement
+    # rows rather than keeping a stale row (bulk_create ignore_conflicts alone would
+    # keep the old one).
+    with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+        ComplianceOverviewSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+        if summary_objects:
            ComplianceOverviewSummary.objects.bulk_create(
                summary_objects, batch_size=500, ignore_conflicts=True
            )
@@ -1022,6 +1039,7 @@ def perform_prowler_scan(
        scan_instance.state = StateChoices.EXECUTING
        scan_instance.started_at = datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc)
        scan_instance.save(update_fields=["state", "started_at", "updated_at"])
+    _clear_scan_rerun_state(tenant_id, scan_id)

    # Find the mutelist processor if it exists
    with rls_transaction(tenant_id, using=READ_REPLICA_ALIAS):
@@ -1651,6 +1669,10 @@ def create_compliance_requirements(tenant_id: str, scan_id: str):
                        elif requirement_status == "PASS":
                            requirement_statuses[key]["pass_count"] += 1

+            # Idempotent re-run: COPY can't ON CONFLICT, so clear this scan's rows first.
+            with rls_transaction(tenant_id):
+                ComplianceRequirementOverview.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id).delete()
+
            # Bulk create requirement records using PostgreSQL COPY
            _persist_compliance_requirement_rows(tenant_id, compliance_requirement_rows)

@@ -359,35 +359,40 @@ def _load_findings_for_requirement_checks(
 def _get_compliance_check_ids(compliance_obj) -> set[str]:
    """Return the union of all check_ids referenced by a compliance framework.

-    Used by the master report orchestrator to know which checks each
-    framework consumes from the shared ``findings_cache``, so that once a
-    framework finishes the entries no other pending framework needs can be
-    evicted from the cache (PROWLER-1733).
+    Used by the master report orchestrator to evict entries from
+    ``findings_cache`` once no pending framework needs them (PROWLER-1733).

-    Args:
-        compliance_obj: A loaded Compliance framework object exposing a
-            ``Requirements`` iterable, each requirement carrying ``Checks``.
-            ``None`` is treated as "no checks" rather than raising, so the
-            caller can pass ``frameworks_bulk.get(...)`` directly without
-            an extra existence check.
-
-    Returns:
-        Set of check_id strings (empty if ``compliance_obj`` is ``None``).
+    Accepts the legacy ``Compliance`` shape (``Requirements`` / ``Checks``
+    lists) and the universal ``ComplianceFramework`` shape (``requirements``
+    / ``checks`` dict keyed by provider). ``None`` returns an empty set so
+    callers can pass ``frameworks_bulk.get(...)`` directly.
    """
    if compliance_obj is None:
        return set()
-    checks: set[str] = set()
-    requirements = getattr(compliance_obj, "Requirements", None) or []
+
+    requirements = getattr(compliance_obj, "Requirements", None) or getattr(
+        compliance_obj, "requirements", None
+    )
+    if not requirements:
+        return set()
+
+    check_ids: set[str] = set()
    try:
-        # Defensive: Mock objects (used in unit tests) return another Mock
-        # for any attribute access, which is truthy but not iterable. Treat
-        # any non-iterable Requirements value as "no checks".
-        for req in requirements:
-            req_checks = getattr(req, "Checks", None) or []
+        # Mock objects in unit tests return another Mock for any attribute
+        # access — truthy but not iterable. Treat that as "no checks".
+        for requirement in requirements:
+            requirement_checks = getattr(requirement, "Checks", None)
+            if requirement_checks is None:
+                checks_by_provider = getattr(requirement, "checks", None) or {}
+                requirement_checks = [
+                    check_id
+                    for check_ids_list in checks_by_provider.values()
+                    for check_id in check_ids_list
+                ]
            try:
-                checks.update(req_checks)
+                check_ids.update(requirement_checks)
            except TypeError:
                continue
    except TypeError:
        return set()
-    return checks
+    return check_ids
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ from tasks.jobs.lighthouse_providers import (
    refresh_lighthouse_provider_models,
 )
 from tasks.jobs.muting import mute_historical_findings
+from tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery import reconcile_orphans
 from tasks.jobs.report import (
    STALE_TMP_OUTPUT_MAX_AGE_HOURS,
    _cleanup_stale_tmp_output_directories,
@@ -67,7 +68,10 @@ from tasks.utils import (
    get_next_execution_datetime,
 )

-from api.compliance import get_compliance_frameworks
+from api.compliance import (
+    get_compliance_frameworks,
+    get_prowler_provider_compliance,
+)
 from api.db_router import READ_REPLICA_ALIAS
 from api.db_utils import delete_related_daily_task, rls_transaction
 from api.decorators import handle_provider_deletion, set_tenant
@@ -75,6 +79,9 @@ from api.models import Finding, Integration, Provider, Scan, ScanSummary, StateC
 from api.utils import initialize_prowler_provider
 from api.v1.serializers import ScanTaskSerializer
 from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
+from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance import (
+    process_universal_compliance_frameworks,
+)
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.generic.generic import GenericCompliance
 from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding as FindingOutput

@@ -462,13 +469,42 @@ def cleanup_stale_attack_paths_scans_task():
    return cleanup_stale_attack_paths_scans()


+@shared_task(name="reconcile-orphan-tasks", queue="celery")
+def reconcile_orphan_tasks_task():
+    """Periodic watchdog: recover tasks whose worker is gone (deploys, crashes)."""
+    return reconcile_orphans()
+
+
@shared_task(name="tenant-deletion", queue="deletion", autoretry_for=(Exception,))
 def delete_tenant_task(tenant_id: str):
    return delete_tenant(pk=tenant_id)


+def _scan_tmp_output_directory(tenant_id: str, scan_id: str) -> Path:
+    """Root tmp output directory for a scan ({tmp}/{tenant_id}/{scan_id})."""
+    return Path(DJANGO_TMP_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY) / str(tenant_id) / str(scan_id)
+
+
+class ScanReportRLSTask(RLSTask):
+    """
+    RLS task that removes the scan's tmp output directory when the task fails.
+
+    Covers failures both inside and outside the task body (e.g. ENOSPC mid-write,
+    or setup errors) so partial artifacts do not accumulate on the worker disk.
+    """
+
+    def on_failure(self, exc, task_id, args, kwargs, _einfo):  # noqa: ARG002
+        del args  # Required by Celery's Task.on_failure signature; not used.
+        tenant_id = kwargs.get("tenant_id")
+        scan_id = kwargs.get("scan_id")
+
+        if tenant_id and scan_id:
+            logger.error(f"Scan report task {task_id} failed: {exc}")
+            rmtree(_scan_tmp_output_directory(tenant_id, scan_id), ignore_errors=True)
+
+
@shared_task(
-    base=RLSTask,
+    base=ScanReportRLSTask,
    name="scan-report",
    queue="scan-reports",
 )
@@ -513,11 +549,23 @@ def generate_outputs_task(scan_id: str, provider_id: str, tenant_id: str):
    provider_uid = provider_obj.uid
    provider_type = provider_obj.provider

+    # Per-framework exporters in `COMPLIANCE_CLASS_MAP` consume the legacy bulk.
    frameworks_bulk = Compliance.get_bulk(provider_type)
+    # Universal-only frameworks (top-level JSONs like `dora.json`) are emitted
+    # via `process_universal_compliance_frameworks` below.
+    universal_bulk = get_prowler_provider_compliance(provider_type)
+    universal_only_names = {
+        name
+        for name in universal_bulk
+        if name not in frameworks_bulk and universal_bulk[name].outputs
+    }
    frameworks_avail = get_compliance_frameworks(provider_type)
    out_dir, comp_dir = _generate_output_directory(
        DJANGO_TMP_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY, provider_uid, tenant_id, scan_id
    )
+    # Removed on success here and on failure by ScanReportRLSTask.on_failure,
+    # so partial artifacts do not accumulate and fill the disk (ENOSPC).
+    scan_tmp_dir = _scan_tmp_output_directory(tenant_id, scan_id)

    def get_writer(writer_map, name, factory, is_last):
        """
@@ -535,6 +583,10 @@ def generate_outputs_task(scan_id: str, provider_id: str, tenant_id: str):

    output_writers = {}
    compliance_writers = {}
+    # Shared across batches so universal writers are created once and reused.
+    universal_compliance_state: dict[str, list] = {"compliance": []}
+    universal_base_dir = os.path.dirname(out_dir)
+    universal_output_filename = os.path.basename(out_dir)

    scan_summary = FindingOutput._transform_findings_stats(
        ScanSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan_id)
@@ -589,8 +641,30 @@ def generate_outputs_task(scan_id: str, provider_id: str, tenant_id: str):
                writer.batch_write_data_to_file(**extra)
                writer._data.clear()

-            # Compliance CSVs
+            # Universal-only frameworks (e.g. `dora.json`).
+            if universal_only_names:
+                process_universal_compliance_frameworks(
+                    input_compliance_frameworks=universal_only_names,
+                    universal_frameworks=universal_bulk,
+                    finding_outputs=fos,
+                    output_directory=universal_base_dir,
+                    output_filename=universal_output_filename,
+                    provider=provider_type,
+                    generated_outputs=universal_compliance_state,
+                    from_cli=False,
+                    is_last=is_last,
+                )
+
+            # Compliance CSVs (per-framework exporters).
            for name in frameworks_avail:
+                if name in universal_only_names:
+                    continue
+                if name not in frameworks_bulk:
+                    logger.warning(
+                        "Compliance framework '%s' missing from bulk; skipping CSV export",
+                        name,
+                    )
+                    continue
                compliance_obj = frameworks_bulk[name]

                klass = GenericCompliance
@@ -666,7 +740,7 @@ def generate_outputs_task(scan_id: str, provider_id: str, tenant_id: str):
        # TODO: We need to create a new periodic task to delete the output files
        # This task shouldn't be responsible for deleting the output files
        try:
-            rmtree(Path(compressed).parent, ignore_errors=True)
+            rmtree(scan_tmp_dir, ignore_errors=True)
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Error deleting output files: {e}")
        final_location, did_upload = upload_uri, True
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 from unittest.mock import call, patch
+from uuid import uuid4

 import pytest
 from django.core.exceptions import ObjectDoesNotExist
 from tasks.jobs.deletion import delete_provider, delete_tenant

 from api.attack_paths import database as graph_database
-from api.models import Provider, Tenant, TenantComplianceSummary
+from api.models import JiraIssueDispatch, Provider, Tenant, TenantComplianceSummary


@pytest.mark.django_db
@@ -34,6 +35,43 @@ class TestDeleteProvider:
                str(instance.id),
            )

+    def test_delete_provider_removes_jira_dispatches(
+        self,
+        providers_fixture,
+        findings_fixture,
+        integrations_fixture,
+    ):
+        """Deleting a provider removes JiraIssueDispatch rows for its findings only."""
+        instance = providers_fixture[0]
+        tenant_id = str(instance.tenant_id)
+        finding = findings_fixture[0]
+        integration = integrations_fixture[0]
+
+        # Dispatch for one of the provider's findings: must be removed with it.
+        JiraIssueDispatch.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=tenant_id,
+            integration=integration,
+            finding_id=finding.id,
+        )
+        # Dispatch for an unrelated finding: must survive the provider deletion.
+        unrelated = JiraIssueDispatch.objects.create(
+            tenant_id=tenant_id,
+            integration=integration,
+            finding_id=uuid4(),
+        )
+
+        with (
+            patch(
+                "tasks.jobs.deletion.graph_database.get_database_name",
+                return_value="tenant-db",
+            ),
+            patch("tasks.jobs.deletion.graph_database.drop_subgraph"),
+        ):
+            delete_provider(tenant_id, instance.id)
+
+        assert not JiraIssueDispatch.objects.filter(finding_id=finding.id).exists()
+        assert JiraIssueDispatch.objects.filter(pk=unrelated.pk).exists()
+
    def test_delete_provider_does_not_exist(self, tenants_fixture):
        with (
            patch(
@@ -1640,14 +1640,74 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
+    def test_send_findings_to_jira_skips_already_dispatched(
+        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
+        mock_initialize_integration,
+        mock_integration_model,
+        mock_finding_model,
+        mock_rls_transaction,
+    ):
+        """A re-run skips findings already ticketed (no duplicate Jira issues)."""
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__enter__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__exit__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_integration_model.objects.get.return_value = MagicMock()
+        # finding-1 was already dispatched in a prior run; finding-2 is new.
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = [
+            "finding-1"
+        ]
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), True)
+
+        mock_jira_integration = MagicMock()
+        mock_jira_integration.send_finding.return_value = True
+        mock_initialize_integration.return_value = mock_jira_integration
+
+        finding2 = MagicMock()
+        finding2.id = "finding-2"
+        finding2.check_id = "check_002"
+        finding2.severity = "low"
+        finding2.status = "FAIL"
+        finding2.status_extended = ""
+        finding2.compliance = {}
+        finding2.resources.exists.return_value = False
+        finding2.resources.first.return_value = None
+        finding2.scan.provider.provider = "aws"
+        finding2.check_metadata = {
+            "checktitle": "C2",
+            "risk": "",
+            "remediation": {"recommendation": {}, "code": {}},
+        }
+        mock_finding_model.all_objects.select_related.return_value.prefetch_related.return_value.get.return_value = finding2
+
+        result = send_findings_to_jira(
+            "tenant-123", "integration-456", "PROJ", "Task", ["finding-1", "finding-2"]
+        )
+
+        # finding-1 skipped (already sent); only finding-2 sent -> no duplicate.
+        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 1}
+        mock_jira_integration.send_finding.assert_called_once()
+        assert (
+            mock_jira_integration.send_finding.call_args.kwargs["check_id"]
+            == "check_002"
+        )
+
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.rls_transaction")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
    def test_send_findings_to_jira_success(
        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
        mock_initialize_integration,
        mock_integration_model,
        mock_finding_model,
        mock_rls_transaction,
    ):
        """Test successful sending of findings to Jira using send_finding method"""
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), True)
        tenant_id = "tenant-123"
        integration_id = "integration-456"
        project_key = "PROJ"
@@ -1739,7 +1799,7 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        )

        # Assertions
-        assert result == {"created_count": 2, "failed_count": 0}
+        assert result == {"created_count": 2, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 0}

        # Verify Jira integration was initialized
        mock_initialize_integration.assert_called_once_with(integration)
@@ -1771,8 +1831,10 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.logger")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
    def test_send_findings_to_jira_partial_failure(
        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
        mock_logger,
        mock_initialize_integration,
        mock_integration_model,
@@ -1780,6 +1842,8 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        mock_rls_transaction,
    ):
        """Test partial failure when sending findings to Jira"""
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), True)
        tenant_id = "tenant-123"
        integration_id = "integration-456"
        project_key = "PROJ"
@@ -1833,23 +1897,35 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        )

        # Assertions
-        assert result == {"created_count": 2, "failed_count": 1}
+        assert result == {"created_count": 2, "failed_count": 1, "skipped_count": 0}

        # Verify error was logged for the failed finding
        mock_logger.error.assert_called_with("Failed to send finding finding-2 to Jira")

+        # The failed finding's reservation is released so a later run can retry it.
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.assert_any_call(
+            tenant_id=tenant_id,
+            integration_id=integration_id,
+            finding_id="finding-2",
+        )
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.delete.assert_called_once()
+
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.rls_transaction")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
    def test_send_findings_to_jira_no_resources(
        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
        mock_initialize_integration,
        mock_integration_model,
        mock_finding_model,
        mock_rls_transaction,
    ):
        """Test sending findings to Jira when finding has no resources"""
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), True)
        tenant_id = "tenant-123"
        integration_id = "integration-456"
        project_key = "PROJ"
@@ -1907,7 +1983,7 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        )

        # Assertions
-        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0}
+        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 0}

        # Verify send_finding was called with empty resource fields
        call_kwargs = mock_jira_integration.send_finding.call_args.kwargs
@@ -1920,14 +1996,18 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
    def test_send_findings_to_jira_with_empty_check_metadata(
        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
        mock_initialize_integration,
        mock_integration_model,
        mock_finding_model,
        mock_rls_transaction,
    ):
        """Test sending findings to Jira when check_metadata is empty or missing fields"""
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), True)
        tenant_id = "tenant-123"
        integration_id = "integration-456"
        project_key = "PROJ"
@@ -1970,7 +2050,7 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        )

        # Assertions
-        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0}
+        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 0}

        # Verify send_finding was called with default/empty values
        call_kwargs = mock_jira_integration.send_finding.call_args.kwargs
@@ -1983,3 +2063,94 @@ class TestJiraIntegration:
        assert call_kwargs["remediation_code_cli"] == ""
        assert call_kwargs["remediation_code_other"] == ""
        assert call_kwargs["compliance"] == {}
+
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.rls_transaction")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
+    def test_send_findings_to_jira_reserves_before_sending(
+        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
+        mock_initialize_integration,
+        mock_integration_model,
+        mock_finding_model,
+        mock_rls_transaction,
+    ):
+        """The dispatch row is reserved before the external Jira call (reserve-then-act)."""
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__enter__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__exit__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_integration_model.objects.get.return_value = MagicMock()
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+
+        order = []
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.side_effect = lambda **kw: (
+            order.append(("reserve", kw)) or (MagicMock(), True)
+        )
+
+        mock_jira_integration = MagicMock()
+        mock_jira_integration.send_finding.side_effect = lambda **kw: (
+            order.append(("send", kw)) or True
+        )
+        mock_initialize_integration.return_value = mock_jira_integration
+
+        finding = MagicMock()
+        finding.id = "finding-1"
+        finding.check_id = "check_001"
+        finding.severity = "low"
+        finding.status = "FAIL"
+        finding.status_extended = ""
+        finding.compliance = {}
+        finding.resources.exists.return_value = False
+        finding.resources.first.return_value = None
+        finding.scan.provider.provider = "aws"
+        finding.check_metadata = {
+            "checktitle": "C1",
+            "risk": "",
+            "remediation": {"recommendation": {}, "code": {}},
+        }
+        mock_finding_model.all_objects.select_related.return_value.prefetch_related.return_value.get.return_value = finding
+
+        result = send_findings_to_jira(
+            "tenant-123", "integration-456", "PROJ", "Task", ["finding-1"]
+        )
+
+        assert result == {"created_count": 1, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 0}
+        # Reservation must precede the external send.
+        assert [entry[0] for entry in order] == ["reserve", "send"]
+        # A successful send keeps the reservation (no rollback delete).
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.delete.assert_not_called()
+
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.rls_transaction")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Finding")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.Integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.initialize_prowler_integration")
+    @patch("tasks.jobs.integrations.JiraIssueDispatch")
+    def test_send_findings_to_jira_skips_when_already_reserved(
+        self,
+        mock_jira_dispatch,
+        mock_initialize_integration,
+        mock_integration_model,
+        mock_finding_model,
+        mock_rls_transaction,
+    ):
+        """A finding that races past the bulk pre-check but loses the reservation
+        (created=False) is skipped without a second issue, leaving the row intact."""
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__enter__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_rls_transaction.return_value.__exit__ = MagicMock()
+        mock_integration_model.objects.get.return_value = MagicMock()
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.values_list.return_value = []
+        # Another concurrent run already created the dispatch row.
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.get_or_create.return_value = (MagicMock(), False)
+
+        mock_jira_integration = MagicMock()
+        mock_initialize_integration.return_value = mock_jira_integration
+
+        result = send_findings_to_jira(
+            "tenant-123", "integration-456", "PROJ", "Task", ["finding-1"]
+        )
+
+        assert result == {"created_count": 0, "failed_count": 0, "skipped_count": 1}
+        mock_jira_integration.send_finding.assert_not_called()
+        # The reservation belongs to the run that won the race; do not delete it.
+        mock_jira_dispatch.objects.filter.return_value.delete.assert_not_called()
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+from uuid import uuid4
+
+import pytest
+from celery import states
+from django_celery_results.models import TaskResult
+
+from api.models import Scan, StateChoices
+from api.models import Task as APITask
+from tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery import (
+    _decode_celery_field,
+    _reconcile_task_results,
+    _recovery_attempt_count,
+    _reenqueue_scan,
+    advisory_lock,
+    is_worker_alive,
+)
+
+
+def _orphan_result(*, name, kwargs, worker, created_minutes_ago, status=states.STARTED):
+    """Create a TaskResult mimicking an in-flight task, backdated past the grace."""
+    tr = TaskResult.objects.create(
+        task_id=str(uuid4()),
+        status=status,
+        task_name=name,
+        worker=worker,
+        task_kwargs=repr(kwargs),
+        task_args=repr([]),
+    )
+    TaskResult.objects.filter(pk=tr.pk).update(
+        date_created=datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc)
+        - timedelta(minutes=created_minutes_ago)
+    )
+    tr.refresh_from_db()
+    return tr
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestDecodeCeleryField:
+    def test_decodes_single_encoded_repr(self):
+        assert _decode_celery_field("{'tenant_id': 'abc'}", {}) == {"tenant_id": "abc"}
+
+    def test_decodes_double_encoded(self):
+        import json
+
+        stored = json.dumps(repr({"tenant_id": "abc", "scan_id": "s1"}))
+        assert _decode_celery_field(stored, {}) == {"tenant_id": "abc", "scan_id": "s1"}
+
+    def test_empty_returns_default(self):
+        assert _decode_celery_field(None, {}) == {}
+        assert _decode_celery_field("", []) == []
+
+    def test_unparseable_raises(self):
+        with pytest.raises(ValueError):
+            _decode_celery_field("<<not a literal>>", {})
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestReconcileTaskResults:
+    def _patches(self, alive):
+        """Patch worker liveness, revoke, and the task registry for re-enqueue."""
+        mock_app = MagicMock()
+        mock_task = MagicMock()
+        mock_app.tasks.get.return_value = mock_task
+        return (
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.is_worker_alive", return_value=alive),
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.revoke_task"),
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.current_app", mock_app),
+            mock_task,
+        )
+
+    def test_recovers_non_scan_task(self, tenants_fixture):
+        """A NON-scan task (tenant-deletion) left orphaned is re-enqueued too."""
+        tenant = tenants_fixture[0]
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="tenant-deletion",
+            kwargs={"tenant_id": str(tenant.id)},
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with (
+            p_alive,
+            p_revoke,
+            p_app,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=1),
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["recovered"]
+        tr.refresh_from_db()
+        assert tr.status == states.REVOKED  # stale result cleared (no pending alert)
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_called_once()
+        call = mock_task.apply_async.call_args.kwargs
+        assert call["kwargs"] == {"tenant_id": str(tenant.id)}
+        assert call["task_id"] != tr.task_id  # fresh task id
+
+    def test_external_integration_task_is_not_reenqueued_by_default(
+        self, tenants_fixture
+    ):
+        """External side-effect tasks without proven idempotency stay terminal.
+
+        integration-s3 rebuilds its upload from worker-local files that do not
+        survive the crash, so re-enqueuing it would upload nothing.
+        """
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="integration-s3",
+            kwargs={
+                "tenant_id": str(tenants_fixture[0].id),
+                "provider_id": str(uuid4()),
+                "output_directory": "/tmp/gone",
+            },
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with (
+            p_alive,
+            p_revoke,
+            p_app,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=1),
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["failed"]
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_jira_integration_task_is_reenqueued(self, tenants_fixture):
+        """integration-jira is re-enqueued: its JiraIssueDispatch reservation makes a
+        re-run skip already-ticketed findings, so recovery cannot duplicate issues."""
+        tenant = tenants_fixture[0]
+        kwargs = {
+            "tenant_id": str(tenant.id),
+            "integration_id": str(uuid4()),
+            "project_key": "PROWLER",
+            "issue_type": "Task",
+            "finding_ids": [str(uuid4()), str(uuid4())],
+        }
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="integration-jira",
+            kwargs=kwargs,
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with (
+            p_alive,
+            p_revoke,
+            p_app,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=1),
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["recovered"]
+        tr.refresh_from_db()
+        assert tr.status == states.REVOKED  # stale result cleared (no pending alert)
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_called_once()
+        call = mock_task.apply_async.call_args.kwargs
+        assert call["kwargs"] == kwargs
+        assert call["task_id"] != tr.task_id  # fresh task id
+
+    def test_skips_live_worker(self, tenants_fixture):
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="tenant-deletion",
+            kwargs={"tenant_id": str(tenants_fixture[0].id)},
+            worker="alive@host",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=True)
+        with p_alive, p_revoke, p_app:
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["skipped"]
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_skips_recently_created(self, tenants_fixture):
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="tenant-deletion",
+            kwargs={"tenant_id": str(tenants_fixture[0].id)},
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=0,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with p_alive, p_revoke, p_app:
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        # too recent: excluded by the grace window (not even a candidate)
+        assert tr.task_id not in result["recovered"]
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_denylisted_task_failed_not_reenqueued(self, tenants_fixture):
+        """A non-allowlisted task is failed, never blind re-run."""
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="some-non-idempotent-task",
+            kwargs={"tenant_id": str(tenants_fixture[0].id)},
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with (
+            p_alive,
+            p_revoke,
+            p_app,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=1),
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["failed"]
+        tr.refresh_from_db()
+        assert tr.status == states.REVOKED
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_recovery_cap_marks_failed(self, tenants_fixture):
+        """When the recovery counter exceeds the cap, the task is failed not re-run."""
+        tr = _orphan_result(
+            name="tenant-deletion",
+            kwargs={"tenant_id": str(tenants_fixture[0].id)},
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            created_minutes_ago=60,
+        )
+        p_alive, p_revoke, p_app, mock_task = self._patches(alive=False)
+        with (
+            p_alive,
+            p_revoke,
+            p_app,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=4),
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert tr.task_id in result["failed"]
+        mock_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestScanRecovery:
+    """Scans are recovered by re-running scan-perform on the EXISTING scan row,
+    so even a scheduled-scan orphan (whose own task would no-op on its guard) is
+    actually re-executed."""
+
+    def _scan_orphan(self, tenant, provider, name):
+        old_id = str(uuid4())
+        tr = TaskResult.objects.create(
+            task_id=old_id,
+            status=states.STARTED,
+            task_name=name,
+            worker="dead@gone",
+            task_kwargs=repr(
+                {"tenant_id": str(tenant.id), "provider_id": str(provider.id)}
+            ),
+            task_args=repr([]),
+        )
+        TaskResult.objects.filter(pk=tr.pk).update(
+            date_created=datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc) - timedelta(minutes=60)
+        )
+        APITask.objects.create(id=old_id, tenant_id=tenant.id, task_runner_task=tr)
+        scan = Scan.objects.create(
+            name="scan-orphan",
+            provider=provider,
+            trigger=Scan.TriggerChoices.SCHEDULED,
+            state=StateChoices.EXECUTING,
+            tenant_id=tenant.id,
+            task_id=old_id,
+            recovery_count=0,
+        )
+        return old_id, scan
+
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize("name", ["scan-perform", "scan-perform-scheduled"])
+    def test_scan_recovered_via_scan_perform(
+        self, tenants_fixture, providers_fixture, name
+    ):
+        tenant, provider = tenants_fixture[0], providers_fixture[0]
+        old_id, scan = self._scan_orphan(tenant, provider, name)
+
+        with (
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.is_worker_alive", return_value=False),
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.revoke_task"),
+            patch("tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery._recovery_attempt_count", return_value=1),
+            patch("tasks.tasks.perform_scan_task") as mock_scan_task,
+        ):
+            result = _reconcile_task_results(
+                grace_minutes=2, max_attempts=3, window_hours=6, dry_run=False
+            )
+
+        assert old_id in result["recovered"]
+        scan.refresh_from_db()
+        assert str(scan.task_id) != old_id  # relinked to a fresh task
+        assert scan.recovery_count == 1
+        assert TaskResult.objects.get(task_id=old_id).status == states.REVOKED
+        # Recovered by re-running scan-perform on the existing scan row (so the
+        # scheduled guard cannot no-op it), regardless of the original task name.
+        mock_scan_task.apply_async.assert_called_once()
+        assert mock_scan_task.apply_async.call_args.kwargs["kwargs"]["scan_id"] == str(
+            scan.id
+        )
+
+    def test_reenqueue_skips_when_scan_already_repointed(
+        self, tenants_fixture, providers_fixture
+    ):
+        # The scan already points at a newer task, so a stale orphan must not relink
+        # it or launch a second concurrent run against the same scan row.
+        tenant, provider = tenants_fixture[0], providers_fixture[0]
+        newer_id = str(uuid4())
+        tr = TaskResult.objects.create(
+            task_id=newer_id, status=states.STARTED, task_name="scan-perform"
+        )
+        APITask.objects.create(id=newer_id, tenant_id=tenant.id, task_runner_task=tr)
+        scan = Scan.objects.create(
+            name="scan-orphan",
+            provider=provider,
+            trigger=Scan.TriggerChoices.SCHEDULED,
+            state=StateChoices.EXECUTING,
+            tenant_id=tenant.id,
+            task_id=newer_id,
+            recovery_count=0,
+        )
+
+        with patch("tasks.tasks.perform_scan_task") as mock_scan_task:
+            recovered = _reenqueue_scan(str(uuid4()), scan)
+
+        assert recovered is False
+        mock_scan_task.apply_async.assert_not_called()
+        scan.refresh_from_db()
+        assert scan.recovery_count == 0
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestOrphanRecoveryHelpers:
+    def test_advisory_lock_acquires_and_releases(self):
+        with advisory_lock() as acquired:
+            assert acquired is True
+
+    def test_is_worker_alive_true_when_responds(self):
+        inspect = MagicMock()
+        inspect.ping.return_value = {"w@h": {"ok": "pong"}}
+        with patch(
+            "tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.current_app.control.inspect",
+            return_value=inspect,
+        ):
+            assert is_worker_alive("w@h") is True
+
+    def test_is_worker_alive_false_when_silent(self):
+        inspect = MagicMock()
+        inspect.ping.return_value = None
+        with patch(
+            "tasks.jobs.orphan_recovery.current_app.control.inspect",
+            return_value=inspect,
+        ):
+            assert is_worker_alive("w@h") is False
+
+    def test_recovery_attempt_count_increments(self):
+        # Unique signature so the Valkey counter starts fresh for this test.
+        kwargs_repr = repr({"probe": str(uuid4())})
+        redis_client = MagicMock()
+        redis_client.incr.side_effect = [1, 2]
+        with patch("redis.from_url", return_value=redis_client):
+            assert _recovery_attempt_count("probe-task", kwargs_repr, 6) == 1
+            assert _recovery_attempt_count("probe-task", kwargs_repr, 6) == 2
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ def basic_csa_compliance_data():
        tenant_id="tenant-123",
        scan_id="scan-456",
        provider_id="provider-789",
-        compliance_id="csa_ccm_4.0_aws",
+        compliance_id="csa_ccm_4.0",
        framework="CSA-CCM",
        name="CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.0",
        version="4.0",
@@ -32,12 +32,15 @@ from tasks.utils import CustomEncoder
 from api.db_router import MainRouter
 from api.exceptions import ProviderConnectionError
 from api.models import (
+    AttackSurfaceOverview,
    Finding,
    MuteRule,
    Provider,
    Resource,
    ResourceScanSummary,
    Scan,
+    ScanCategorySummary,
+    ScanGroupSummary,
    ScanSummary,
    StateChoices,
    StatusChoices,
@@ -229,6 +232,131 @@ class TestPerformScan:
        # Assert that failed_findings_count is 0 (finding is PASS and muted)
        assert scan_resource.failed_findings_count == 0

+    def test_perform_prowler_scan_idempotent_on_rerun(
+        self,
+        tenants_fixture,
+        scans_fixture,
+        providers_fixture,
+    ):
+        """Re-running a scan for the same scan_id must not duplicate findings."""
+        with (
+            patch("api.db_utils.rls_transaction"),
+            patch(
+                "tasks.jobs.scan.initialize_prowler_provider"
+            ) as mock_initialize_prowler_provider,
+            patch("tasks.jobs.scan.ProwlerScan") as mock_prowler_scan_class,
+            patch(
+                "tasks.jobs.scan.PROWLER_COMPLIANCE_OVERVIEW_TEMPLATE",
+                new_callable=dict,
+            ),
+            patch("api.compliance.PROWLER_CHECKS", new_callable=dict) as mock_checks,
+        ):
+            mock_checks["aws"] = {"check1": {"compliance1"}}
+
+            tenant = tenants_fixture[0]
+            scan = scans_fixture[0]
+            provider = providers_fixture[0]
+            provider.provider = Provider.ProviderChoices.AWS
+            provider.save()
+
+            tenant_id = str(tenant.id)
+            scan_id = str(scan.id)
+            provider_id = str(provider.id)
+
+            stale_resource = Resource.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                provider=provider,
+                uid="stale_resource_uid",
+                name="stale",
+                region="stale-region",
+                service="stale-service",
+                type="stale-type",
+            )
+            ResourceScanSummary.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                scan_id=scan.id,
+                resource_id=stale_resource.id,
+                service="stale-service",
+                region="stale-region",
+                resource_type="stale-type",
+            )
+            ScanCategorySummary.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                scan=scan,
+                category="stale-category",
+                severity=Severity.medium,
+                total_findings=1,
+            )
+            ScanGroupSummary.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                scan=scan,
+                resource_group="stale-group",
+                severity=Severity.medium,
+                total_findings=1,
+            )
+            ScanSummary.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                scan=scan,
+                check_id="stale_check",
+                service="stale-service",
+                severity=Severity.medium,
+                region="stale-region",
+                total=1,
+            )
+            AttackSurfaceOverview.objects.create(
+                tenant_id=tenant.id,
+                scan=scan,
+                attack_surface_type=AttackSurfaceOverview.AttackSurfaceTypeChoices.SECRETS,
+                total_findings=1,
+            )
+
+            finding = MagicMock()
+            finding.uid = "dup_probe_finding"
+            finding.status = StatusChoices.PASS
+            finding.status_extended = "x"
+            finding.severity = Severity.medium
+            finding.check_id = "check1"
+            finding.get_metadata.return_value = {"key": "value"}
+            finding.resource_uid = "resource_uid"
+            finding.resource_name = "resource_name"
+            finding.region = "region"
+            finding.service_name = "service_name"
+            finding.resource_type = "resource_type"
+            finding.resource_tags = {}
+            finding.muted = False
+            finding.raw = {}
+            finding.resource_metadata = {}
+            finding.resource_details = {}
+            finding.partition = "partition"
+            finding.compliance = {}
+
+            mock_scan_instance = MagicMock()
+            mock_scan_instance.scan.return_value = [(100, [finding])]
+            mock_prowler_scan_class.return_value = mock_scan_instance
+
+            mock_provider_instance = MagicMock()
+            mock_provider_instance.get_regions.return_value = ["region"]
+            mock_initialize_prowler_provider.return_value = mock_provider_instance
+
+            # Run the same scan twice (simulating an orphan-recovery re-run).
+            perform_prowler_scan(tenant_id, scan_id, provider_id, ["check1"])
+            perform_prowler_scan(tenant_id, scan_id, provider_id, ["check1"])
+
+        # Neither findings nor resources are duplicated by the re-run: findings are
+        # scope-deleted before re-insert; resources are upserted by (tenant, provider, uid).
+        assert Finding.objects.filter(scan=scan).count() == 1
+        assert Resource.objects.filter(provider=provider).count() == 2
+        assert ResourceScanSummary.objects.filter(scan_id=scan.id).count() == 1
+        assert not ResourceScanSummary.objects.filter(
+            scan_id=scan.id, resource_id=stale_resource.id
+        ).exists()
+        assert not ScanCategorySummary.objects.filter(scan=scan).exists()
+        assert not ScanGroupSummary.objects.filter(scan=scan).exists()
+        assert not ScanSummary.objects.filter(
+            scan=scan, check_id="stale_check"
+        ).exists()
+        assert not AttackSurfaceOverview.objects.filter(scan=scan).exists()
+
    @patch("tasks.jobs.scan.ProwlerScan")
    @patch(
        "tasks.jobs.scan.initialize_prowler_provider",
@@ -1880,6 +2008,62 @@ class TestCreateComplianceRequirements:

            assert "requirements_created" in result

+    @pytest.mark.django_db(transaction=True)
+    def test_create_compliance_requirements_idempotent_on_rerun(
+        self,
+        tenants_fixture,
+        scans_fixture,
+        providers_fixture,
+        findings_fixture,
+    ):
+        """Re-running compliance materialization must not raise nor duplicate rows.
+
+        Uses transaction=True because the COPY path commits on its own connection,
+        so the test must use real commits (mirroring production) rather than the
+        default rollback wrapper.
+        """
+        from api.models import ComplianceRequirementOverview
+
+        with patch(
+            "tasks.jobs.scan.PROWLER_COMPLIANCE_OVERVIEW_TEMPLATE"
+        ) as mock_compliance_template:
+            tenant_id = str(tenants_fixture[0].id)
+            scan_id = str(scans_fixture[0].id)
+
+            mock_compliance_template.__getitem__.return_value = {
+                "test_compliance": {
+                    "framework": "Test Framework",
+                    "version": "1.0",
+                    "requirements": {
+                        "req_1": {
+                            "description": "Test Requirement 1",
+                            "checks": {"test_check_id": None},
+                            "checks_status": {
+                                "pass": 2,
+                                "fail": 1,
+                                "manual": 0,
+                                "total": 3,
+                            },
+                            "status": "FAIL",
+                        },
+                    },
+                }
+            }
+
+            create_compliance_requirements(tenant_id, scan_id)
+            count_after_first = ComplianceRequirementOverview.objects.filter(
+                scan_id=scan_id
+            ).count()
+
+            # Second run must not raise and must not duplicate rows.
+            create_compliance_requirements(tenant_id, scan_id)
+            count_after_second = ComplianceRequirementOverview.objects.filter(
+                scan_id=scan_id
+            ).count()
+
+        assert count_after_first > 0
+        assert count_after_second == count_after_first
+
    def test_create_compliance_requirements_kubernetes_provider(
        self,
        tenants_fixture,
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@ from tasks.jobs.lighthouse_providers import (
 from tasks.tasks import (
    DJANGO_TMP_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY,
    STALE_TMP_OUTPUT_MAX_AGE_HOURS,
+    ScanReportRLSTask,
    _cleanup_orphan_scheduled_scans,
    _perform_scan_complete_tasks,
+    _scan_tmp_output_directory,
    check_integrations_task,
    check_lighthouse_provider_connection_task,
    generate_outputs_task,
@@ -321,6 +323,7 @@ class TestGenerateOutputs:

        mock_transformed_stats = {"some": "stats"}
        with (
+            patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={}),
            patch(
                "tasks.tasks.FindingOutput._transform_findings_stats",
                return_value=mock_transformed_stats,
@@ -439,6 +442,7 @@ class TestGenerateOutputs:
        mock_provider.uid = "test-provider-uid"

        with (
+            patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={}),
            patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter") as mock_filter,
            patch("tasks.tasks.Provider.objects.get", return_value=mock_provider),
            patch("tasks.tasks.initialize_prowler_provider"),
@@ -594,6 +598,7 @@ class TestGenerateOutputs:
        ]

        with (
+            patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={}),
            patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter") as mock_summary,
            patch(
                "tasks.tasks.Provider.objects.get",
@@ -668,6 +673,7 @@ class TestGenerateOutputs:
        mock_provider.uid = "test-provider-uid"

        with (
+            patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={}),
            patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter") as mock_filter,
            patch("tasks.tasks.Provider.objects.get", return_value=mock_provider),
            patch("tasks.tasks.initialize_prowler_provider"),
@@ -771,6 +777,38 @@ class TestGenerateOutputs:
            mock_s3_task.assert_called_once()


+class TestScanReportRLSTaskOnFailure:
+    def test_on_failure_removes_scan_tmp_directory(self):
+        task = ScanReportRLSTask()
+
+        with patch("tasks.tasks.rmtree") as mock_rmtree:
+            task.on_failure(
+                exc=OSError("No space left on device"),
+                task_id="task-abc",
+                args=(),
+                kwargs={"tenant_id": "t-1", "scan_id": "s-1"},
+                _einfo=None,
+            )
+
+        mock_rmtree.assert_called_once_with(
+            _scan_tmp_output_directory("t-1", "s-1"), ignore_errors=True
+        )
+
+    def test_on_failure_skips_when_missing_kwargs(self):
+        task = ScanReportRLSTask()
+
+        with patch("tasks.tasks.rmtree") as mock_rmtree:
+            task.on_failure(
+                exc=OSError("No space left on device"),
+                task_id="task-abc",
+                args=(),
+                kwargs={},
+                _einfo=None,
+            )
+
+        mock_rmtree.assert_not_called()
+
+
 class TestScanCompleteTasks:
    @patch("tasks.tasks.aggregate_attack_surface_task.apply_async")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.chain")
@@ -1079,6 +1117,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:
            enabled=True,
        )

+    @patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={})
    @patch("tasks.tasks.s3_integration_task")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.Integration.objects.filter")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter")
@@ -1111,6 +1150,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:
        mock_scan_summary,
        mock_integration_filter,
        mock_s3_task,
+        mock_get_prowler_compliance,
    ):
        """Test that ASFF output is generated for AWS providers with SecurityHub integration."""
        # Setup
@@ -1207,6 +1247,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:

            assert result == {"upload": True}

+    @patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={})
    @patch("tasks.tasks.s3_integration_task")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.Integration.objects.filter")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter")
@@ -1239,6 +1280,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:
        mock_scan_summary,
        mock_integration_filter,
        mock_s3_task,
+        mock_get_prowler_compliance,
    ):
        """Test that ASFF output is NOT generated for AWS providers without SecurityHub integration."""
        # Setup
@@ -1332,6 +1374,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:

            assert result == {"upload": True}

+    @patch("tasks.tasks.get_prowler_provider_compliance", return_value={})
    @patch("tasks.tasks.ScanSummary.objects.filter")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.Provider.objects.get")
    @patch("tasks.tasks.initialize_prowler_provider")
@@ -1360,6 +1403,7 @@ class TestCheckIntegrationsTask:
        mock_initialize_provider,
        mock_provider_get,
        mock_scan_summary,
+        mock_get_prowler_compliance,
    ):
        """Test that ASFF output is NOT generated for non-AWS providers (e.g., Azure, GCP)."""
        # Setup
@@ -2672,3 +2716,36 @@ class TestReaggregateAllFindingGroupSummaries:
        assert result == {"scans_reaggregated": 0}
        mock_group.assert_not_called()
        mock_chain.assert_not_called()
+
+
+class TestTaskTimeLimits:
+    """The per-task limits in task_annotations must actually take effect.
+
+    Celery applies a "*" annotation after the per-task one, so a "*" entry would
+    silently overwrite every specific limit and cap long scans at the default. The
+    default is set as the global limit instead, and these per-task limits must win.
+    """
+
+    def test_long_running_tasks_exceed_the_default_limit(self):
+        from config.celery import celery_app
+
+        default = celery_app.conf.task_time_limit
+        for name in (
+            "scan-perform",
+            "scan-perform-scheduled",
+            "provider-deletion",
+            "tenant-deletion",
+        ):
+            assert celery_app.tasks[name].time_limit > default
+
+    def test_connection_checks_stay_below_the_default_limit(self):
+        from config.celery import celery_app
+
+        default = celery_app.conf.task_time_limit
+        for name in (
+            "provider-connection-check",
+            "integration-connection-check",
+            "lighthouse-connection-check",
+            "lighthouse-provider-connection-check",
+        ):
+            assert celery_app.tasks[name].time_limit < default
@@ -4494,7 +4494,7 @@ dependencies = [

 [[package]]
 name = "prowler-api"
-version = "1.30.0"
+version = "1.31.0"
 source = { virtual = "." }
 dependencies = [
    { name = "cartography" },
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ services:

  worker-dev:
    image: prowler-api-dev
+    # Give Celery soft shutdown time to drain/re-queue in-flight tasks on stop.
+    stop_grace_period: 120s
    build:
      context: ./api
      dockerfile: Dockerfile
@@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ services:

  worker:
    image: prowlercloud/prowler-api:${PROWLER_API_VERSION:-stable}
+    # Give Celery soft shutdown time to drain/re-queue in-flight tasks on stop.
+    stop_grace_period: 120s
    env_file:
      - path: .env
        required: false
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Example 1 is vague and even potentially ambiguous. Verbs state your purpose and

 Explicit use of second-person pronouns (you) and possessives (your) should be minimized whenever possible. Those constructions are best reserved for cases when instructions are directly given in an imperative form:

-**Example of Improvement Through Avoiding Second Person Pronouns**
+### Example of Improvement Through Avoiding Second Person Pronouns

 **Original:**
 Prowler App can be installed in different ways, depending on your environment:
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ The use of bullet points is highly recommended when:
 * Information can be logically divided into multiple categories, each sharing characteristics, features, or other relevant classifications.
 * Items are significant enough as standalone concepts to deserve their own bullet point.

-**Example of Improvement Through Bullet Points**
+#### Example of Improvement Through Bullet Points

 **Original:**
 It contains hundreds of controls covering CIS, NIST 800, NIST CSF, CISA, RBI, FedRAMS, PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, FFIEC, SOC2, GXP, AWS Well-Architected Framework Security Pillar, AWS Foundational Technical Review (FTR), ENS (Spanish National Security Scheme), and your custom security frameworks.
@@ -2,40 +2,228 @@
 title: 'Creating a New Security Compliance Framework in Prowler'
 ---

-This guide explains how to add a new security compliance framework to Prowler, end to end. It covers directory layout, the JSON schema, check mapping conventions, the Pydantic models that validate each framework, the CSV output formatter, local validation, testing, and the pull request process.
+This guide explains how to add a new security compliance framework to Prowler, end to end. It covers directory layout, the two supported JSON schemas (universal and legacy), the Pydantic models that validate each framework, check mapping conventions, output formatting, local validation, testing, and the pull request process.

 ## Introduction

-A compliance framework in Prowler maps a public or custom control catalog (for example CIS, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ENS, CCC) to the security checks that Prowler already runs. Each requirement links to zero, one or more Prowler checks. When a scan executes, findings are aggregated per requirement to produce the compliance report rendered by Prowler CLI and Prowler Cloud.
+A compliance framework in Prowler maps a public or custom control catalog (for example CIS, NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ENS, CCC, DORA) to the security checks that Prowler already runs. Each requirement links to zero, one or more Prowler checks. When a scan executes, findings are aggregated per requirement to produce the compliance report rendered by Prowler CLI and Prowler Cloud.

-Prowler ships with 85+ compliance frameworks across All Providers. The catalog lives under `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` (or `prowler/compliance/` for universal compliance frameworks)
+Prowler ships 85+ compliance frameworks across all providers. The catalog lives under `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` (legacy, per-provider) or `prowler/compliance/` (universal, multi-provider).

 <Warning>
-A compliance framework must represent the **complete state** of the source catalog. Every requirement defined by the framework has to be present in the JSON file, even when none of the existing Prowler checks can automate it. In that case, leave `Checks` as an empty array, but do not omit the requirement.
+A compliance framework must represent the **complete state** of the source catalog. Every requirement defined by the framework has to be present in the JSON file, even when no Prowler check can automate it. In that case, leave the requirement's check list empty, but do not omit the requirement.

 Requirement coverage feeds the compliance percentage calculations and the metadata surfaces (dashboards, widgets, exports). Missing requirements skew those metrics and break the report as a faithful snapshot of the framework.
 </Warning>

+### Two supported schemas
+
+| Schema | When to use | File location | Discovered as |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| **Universal (recommended for new frameworks)** | Multi-provider frameworks, or single-provider frameworks that benefit from declarative table/PDF rendering | `prowler/compliance/<framework>.json` (top-level) | Available for **every** provider whose key appears in any `requirement.checks` dict |
+| **Legacy provider-specific** | Single-provider frameworks with framework-specific attribute classes already declared in the codebase (CIS, ENS, ISO 27001, etc.) | `prowler/compliance/<provider>/<framework>_<version>_<provider>.json` | Available only under that provider |
+
+Auto-discovery happens in `get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal(provider)` (`prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py:915`), which scans **both** the top-level `prowler/compliance/` directory and every per-provider sub-directory. Legacy frameworks are transparently converted to the universal `ComplianceFramework` model via `adapt_legacy_to_universal()` before being returned, so the rest of Prowler — CLI table rendering, CSV/OCSF outputs, PDF generation — works the same regardless of the source schema.
+
+> The legacy entry-point `Compliance.get_bulk(provider)` (used by older code paths) only scans per-provider sub-directories. Universal top-level files are picked up exclusively via the universal loader; this matters if you are wiring a new code path against the legacy API.
+
+For **new** frameworks, prefer the universal schema: it requires no Python code changes, supports multiple providers in a single file, and table/PDF rendering is driven entirely from declarative configuration inside the JSON.
+
+> All Pydantic models in `compliance_models.py` are imported from `pydantic.v1`. Subclasses you add for the legacy schema must use `from pydantic.v1 import BaseModel`.
+
 ### Prerequisites

 Before adding a new framework, complete the following checks:

- **Verify the framework is not already supported.** Inspect `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` for an existing JSON file matching the name and version.
+- **Verify the framework is not already supported.** Inspect `prowler/compliance/` and every `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` for an existing JSON file matching the name and version.
 - **Confirm the required checks exist.** Every requirement that can be automated must point to one or more existing Prowler checks. For each missing check, implement it first by following the [Prowler Checks](/developer-guide/checks) guide.
- **Review a reference framework.** Use an existing framework with a similar structure as your template. `cis_2.0_aws.json` is the canonical reference for CIS-style frameworks. `ccc_aws.json`, `ens_rd2022_aws.json`, and `nist_800_53_revision_5_aws.json` illustrate other attribute shapes.
+- **Review a reference framework.** Use an existing framework with a similar structure as your template:
+  - Universal: `prowler/compliance/dora.json`, `prowler/compliance/csa_ccm_4.0.json`.
+  - Legacy: `prowler/compliance/aws/cis_2.0_aws.json` (canonical CIS shape), `prowler/compliance/aws/ccc_aws.json`, `prowler/compliance/aws/ens_rd2022_aws.json`, `prowler/compliance/aws/nist_800_53_revision_5_aws.json`.

-## Four-Layer Architecture
+## Universal Compliance Framework

-A compliance framework spans four layers. A complete contribution must touch each layer that applies.
+### Where the file lives

- **Layer 1 – Schema validation:** The Pydantic models in `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` define the canonical schema for each attribute shape (CIS, ENS, Mitre, CCC, C5, CSA CCM, ISO 27001, KISA ISMS-P, AWS Well-Architected, Prowler ThreatScore, and a generic fallback).
- **Layer 2 – JSON catalog:** The framework JSON file in `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` lists every requirement and maps it to checks.
- **Layer 3 – Output formatter:** The Python module in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` builds the CSV row model, the per-provider transformer, and the CLI summary table.
- **Layer 4 – Output dispatchers:** The dispatchers in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance.py` and `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance_output.py` route findings to the right formatter based on the framework identifier.
+Place the file at the top level of the compliance directory:

-The rest of this guide walks each layer in order.
+```
+prowler/compliance/<framework_name>.json
+```

-## Directory Structure and File Naming
+Examples in the repository: `prowler/compliance/csa_ccm_4.0.json`, `prowler/compliance/dora.json`.
+
+The file is auto-discovered — there is **no** need to register it in any `__init__.py`, modify `prowler/lib/outputs/`, or update any other Python module. The framework key Prowler CLI accepts via `--compliance` is the basename of the JSON file without `.json` (`dora.json` → `dora`).
+
+### Top-level structure
+
+```json
+{
+  "framework": "<short identifier, e.g. \"DORA\" or \"CSA-CCM\">",
+  "name": "<human-readable full name>",
+  "version": "<framework version>",
+  "description": "<one-paragraph description shown in --list-compliance and PDF reports>",
+  "icon": "<short icon slug, optional>",
+  "attributes_metadata": [ /* see below */ ],
+  "outputs": { /* see below — optional */ },
+  "requirements": [ /* see below */ ]
+}
+```
+
+A `provider` field at the top level is **optional**. The framework's effective provider list is derived by `ComplianceFramework.get_providers()` (`compliance_models.py:739`) from the union of all keys appearing in `requirement.checks` across all requirements; the explicit `provider` field is used **only as a fallback** when no requirement carries any `checks` key. This is what enables a single file (e.g. `dora.json`) to cover AWS today and add Azure / GCP / etc. tomorrow without restructuring.
+
+Provider keys inside `requirement.checks` must match the directory names under `prowler/providers/`. The valid keys at present are: `aws`, `azure`, `gcp`, `m365`, `kubernetes`, `iac`, `github`, `googleworkspace`, `alibabacloud`, `cloudflare`, `mongodbatlas`, `nhn`, `openstack`, `oraclecloud`, `llm`. Comparison in `supports_provider()` is case-insensitive, but lowercase is the convention used everywhere in the repository.
+
+### `attributes_metadata`
+
+Declares the shape of the per-requirement `attributes` dict. When this field is present, the root validator `validate_attributes_against_metadata` (`compliance_models.py:669`) enforces the schema at load time and rejects:
+
+- Missing keys marked `required: true`.
+- Keys present in `attributes` but not declared in `attributes_metadata` (typo / drift guard).
+- Values that violate a declared `enum`.
+- Values whose Python type does not match a declared `int`, `float` or `bool`.
+
+The runtime type check **only** covers `int`, `float` and `bool`. For `str`, `list_str` and `list_dict` the type is documentation-only — non-conforming values won't fail validation. If `attributes_metadata` is omitted, **no per-requirement validation runs at all**.
+
+```json
+"attributes_metadata": [
+  {
+    "key": "Pillar",
+    "label": "Pillar",
+    "type": "str",
+    "required": true,
+    "enum": [
+      "ICT Risk Management",
+      "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+      "Digital Operational Resilience Testing",
+      "ICT Third-Party Risk Management",
+      "Information Sharing"
+    ],
+    "output_formats": { "csv": true, "ocsf": true }
+  },
+  {
+    "key": "Article",
+    "label": "Article",
+    "type": "str",
+    "required": true,
+    "output_formats": { "csv": true, "ocsf": true }
+  }
+]
+```
+
+Per attribute:
+
+- `key` (required): attribute name as it will appear in `requirement.attributes`.
+- `label`: human-readable label used in CSV headers and PDF.
+- `type`: one of `str`, `int`, `float`, `bool`, `list_str`, `list_dict`. Defaults to `str`.
+- `enum`: optional list of allowed values; non-conforming values are rejected at load time.
+- `required`: if `true`, every requirement must include this key with a non-null value.
+- `enum_display` / `enum_order`: optional per-enum-value visual metadata (label, abbreviation, color, icon) and explicit ordering for PDF rendering.
+- `output_formats`: `{ "csv": <bool>, "ocsf": <bool> }` — toggles inclusion in each output format. Both default to `true`.
+
+### `outputs`
+
+Optional. Controls how the framework is rendered in the console table and in the generated PDF report. Skipping it falls back to sensible defaults.
+
+```json
+"outputs": {
+  "table_config": {
+    "group_by": "Pillar"
+  },
+  "pdf_config": {
+    "language": "en",
+    "primary_color": "#003399",
+    "secondary_color": "#0055A5",
+    "bg_color": "#F0F4FA",
+    "group_by_field": "Pillar",
+    "sections": [ "ICT Risk Management", "ICT-Related Incident Reporting", "..." ],
+    "section_short_names": { "ICT Risk Management": "ICT Risk Mgmt" },
+    "charts": [
+      {
+        "id": "pillar_compliance",
+        "type": "horizontal_bar",
+        "group_by": "Pillar",
+        "title": "Compliance Score by Pillar",
+        "y_label": "Pillar",
+        "x_label": "Compliance %",
+        "value_source": "compliance_percent",
+        "color_mode": "by_value"
+      }
+    ],
+    "filter": { "only_failed": true, "include_manual": false }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+`table_config.group_by` must reference an attribute key declared in `attributes_metadata`. The same applies to `pdf_config.group_by_field` and to every `charts[].group_by`.
+
+For frameworks with weighted scoring (e.g. ThreatScore) declare `pdf_config.scoring` with `risk_field` / `weight_field` / `risk_boost_factor`. For column splitting (e.g. CIS Level 1 vs Level 2) use `table_config.split_by`.
+
+### `requirements`
+
+```json
+"requirements": [
+  {
+    "id": "DORA-Art5",
+    "name": "Governance and organisation",
+    "description": "Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT internal governance and control framework. ...",
+    "attributes": {
+      "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+      "Article": "Article 5",
+      "ArticleTitle": "Governance and organisation"
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "aws": [
+        "iam_avoid_root_usage",
+        "iam_no_root_access_key",
+        "iam_root_mfa_enabled"
+      ],
+      "azure": [],
+      "gcp": []
+    }
+  }
+]
+```
+
+Per requirement:
+
+- `id` (required): unique identifier within the framework.
+- `description` (required): the requirement text as authored by the framework.
+- `name`: short title shown alongside the id.
+- `attributes`: flat dict; keys must conform to `attributes_metadata`.
+- `checks`: dict keyed by provider name (the same lowercase keys listed in the previous section). Each value is a list of Prowler check names that evidence this requirement for that provider. The list **may be empty** and the dict itself defaults to `{}` if omitted; either way the requirement is still loaded and listed by `--list-compliance-requirements`, it just has zero checks to execute. Note: there is **no automatic check-existence validation** at load time — referencing a non-existent check name will silently produce a requirement with no findings. Validate this yourself (see "Validating Your Framework" below).
+
+For MITRE-style frameworks, additional optional fields are available on the requirement: `tactics`, `sub_techniques`, `platforms`, `technique_url` (these are populated automatically when adapting a legacy MITRE JSON to the universal model).
+
+### Multi-provider frameworks
+
+A single universal file can cover any number of providers. The framework appears under each provider's `--list-compliance` output as long as **at least one** requirement has that provider key in its `checks` dict.
+
+When extending an existing universal framework with a new provider, the only change required is editing `requirement.checks`:
+
+```diff
+ "checks": {
+   "aws": ["iam_avoid_root_usage", "iam_no_root_access_key"],
+  "azure": ["entra_policy_ensure_mfa_for_admin_roles"]
+ }
+```
+
+No code changes, no new file, no registration step.
+
+## Legacy Provider-Specific Compliance Framework
+
+The legacy schema is still fully supported and remains the format used by most frameworks shipped today (CIS, NIST, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, ENS, etc.). It binds a framework to a single provider and validates each requirement against a framework-specific Pydantic attribute class.
+
+The legacy schema spans **four layers** — a complete contribution must touch every layer that applies:
+
+- **Layer 1 — Schema validation:** the Pydantic models in `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` define the canonical schema for each attribute shape.
+- **Layer 2 — JSON catalog:** the framework JSON file in `prowler/compliance/<provider>/` lists every requirement and maps it to checks.
+- **Layer 3 — Output formatter:** the Python module in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` builds the CSV row model, the per-provider transformer, and the CLI summary table.
+- **Layer 4 — Output dispatchers:** the dispatchers in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance.py` and `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance_output.py` route findings to the right formatter based on the framework identifier.
+
+The universal schema collapses Layers 3 and 4 into declarative configuration inside the JSON — that is the main reason it is preferred for new contributions.
+
+### Directory structure and file naming

 Compliance frameworks live at:

@@ -46,8 +234,8 @@ prowler/compliance/<provider>/<framework>_<version>_<provider>.json
 The filename conventions are:

 - All lowercase, words separated with underscores.
- `<provider>` is a supported provider identifier: `aws`, `azure`, `gcp`, `kubernetes`, `m365`, `github`, `googleworkspace`, `alibabacloud`, `oraclecloud`, `cloudflare`, `mongodbatlas`, `nhn`, `openstack`, `iac`, `llm`.
- `<version>` is optional. Omit it when the framework has no versioning, as in `ccc_aws.json`.
+- `<provider>` is a supported provider identifier (same lowercase list as the universal section above).
+- `<version>` is optional but recommended. Omit only when the framework has no versioning (e.g. `ccc_aws.json`).
 - The file basename (without `.json`) is the framework key that Prowler CLI accepts via `--compliance`.

 Examples:
@@ -62,48 +250,50 @@ The output formatter directory mirrors the framework name:

 ```
 prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/
-├── <framework>.py           # CLI summary-table dispatcher
+├── <framework>.py            # CLI summary-table dispatcher
 ├── <framework>_<provider>.py # Per-provider transformer class
 ├── models.py                 # Pydantic CSV row model
 └── __init__.py
 ```

-## JSON Schema Reference
+### JSON schema reference

-Every compliance file is a JSON document with the following top-level keys.
+Every legacy compliance file is a JSON document with the following top-level keys. `Framework`, `Name` and `Provider` are validated non-empty by the root validator `framework_and_provider_must_not_be_empty` (`compliance_models.py:329`).

 | Field | Type | Required | Description |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | `Framework` | string | Yes | Canonical framework identifier, for example `CIS`, `NIST-800-53-Revision-5`, `ENS`, `CCC`. |
 | `Name` | string | Yes | Human-readable framework name displayed by Prowler App. |
-| `Version` | string | Yes | Framework version, for example `2.0`. Use an empty string only for frameworks without versioning. See [Version Handling](#version-handling). |
+| `Version` | string | Yes (recommended) | Framework version, e.g. `2.0`. See [Version Handling](#version-handling). |
 | `Provider` | string | Yes | Upper-cased provider identifier: `AWS`, `AZURE`, `GCP`, `KUBERNETES`, `M365`, `GITHUB`, `GOOGLEWORKSPACE`, and so on. |
 | `Description` | string | Yes | Short description of the framework's scope and purpose. |
 | `Requirements` | array | Yes | List of [requirement objects](#requirement-object). |

-### Requirement Object
+#### Requirement Object

 Each entry in `Requirements` describes one control or requirement.

 | Field | Type | Required | Description |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | `Id` | string | Yes | Unique identifier within the framework, for example `1.10` or `CCC.Core.CN01.AR01`. |
-| `Name` | string | No | Optional human-readable name used by frameworks that distinguish control name from description, such as NIST. |
+| `Name` | string | No | Optional human-readable name (frameworks like NIST distinguish control name from description). |
 | `Description` | string | Yes | Verbatim description from the source framework. |
 | `Attributes` | array | Yes | List of [attribute objects](#attribute-objects). The shape depends on the framework. |
 | `Checks` | array of strings | Yes | Prowler check identifiers that automate the requirement. Leave the list empty when the control cannot be automated. |

-### Attribute Objects
+#### Attribute Objects

-Attributes carry the metadata that Prowler App and the CSV output display for each requirement. The object shape is framework-specific and is validated by a dedicated Pydantic model in `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py`. The most common shapes are summarized below.
+`Attributes` is parsed against the union declared in `Compliance_Requirement.Attributes` (`compliance_models.py:293`). Pydantic v1 tries each member of the union in declaration order and falls back to `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute` (the last entry) when nothing else matches — so a brand-new shape that doesn't match any existing class will silently be accepted as Generic, losing its specific fields.

-#### CIS_Requirement_Attribute
+As of today, the registered attribute classes are: `CIS_Requirement_Attribute`, `ENS_Requirement_Attribute`, `ASDEssentialEight_Requirement_Attribute`, `ISO27001_2013_Requirement_Attribute`, `AWS_Well_Architected_Requirement_Attribute`, `KISA_ISMSP_Requirement_Attribute`, `Prowler_ThreatScore_Requirement_Attribute`, `CCC_Requirement_Attribute`, `C5Germany_Requirement_Attribute`, `CSA_CCM_Requirement_Attribute`, and `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute` (fallback). MITRE-style frameworks use the separate `Mitre_Requirement` model with `Tactics` / `SubTechniques` / `Platforms` / `TechniqueURL` at the requirement top level. The most common shapes are summarized below.
+
+##### CIS_Requirement_Attribute

 Used by every CIS benchmark.

 | Field | Type | Required | Notes |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `Section` | string | Yes | Top-level section, for example `1 Identity and Access Management`. |
+| `Section` | string | Yes | Top-level section, e.g. `1 Identity and Access Management`. |
 | `SubSection` | string | No | Optional second-level grouping. |
 | `Profile` | enum | Yes | One of `Level 1`, `Level 2`, `E3 Level 1`, `E3 Level 2`, `E5 Level 1`, `E5 Level 2`. |
 | `AssessmentStatus` | enum | Yes | `Manual` or `Automated`. |
@@ -116,7 +306,7 @@ Used by every CIS benchmark.
 | `DefaultValue` | string | No | Default configuration value, when relevant. |
 | `References` | string | Yes | Colon-separated list of reference URLs. |

-#### ENS_Requirement_Attribute
+##### ENS_Requirement_Attribute

 Used by the Spanish ENS (Esquema Nacional de Seguridad) frameworks.

@@ -132,13 +322,13 @@ Used by the Spanish ENS (Esquema Nacional de Seguridad) frameworks.
 | `ModoEjecucion` | string | Yes | Execution mode (`manual`, `automático`, `híbrido`). |
 | `Dependencias` | array of strings | Yes | Ids of prerequisite controls. Empty list when none. |

-#### CCC_Requirement_Attribute
+##### CCC_Requirement_Attribute

 Used by the Common Cloud Controls Catalog.

 | Field | Type | Required | Notes |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `FamilyName` | string | Yes | Control family, for example `Data`. |
+| `FamilyName` | string | Yes | Control family, e.g. `Data`. |
 | `FamilyDescription` | string | Yes | Description of the family. |
 | `Section` | string | Yes | Section title. |
 | `SubSection` | string | Yes | Subsection title, or empty string. |
@@ -148,9 +338,9 @@ Used by the Common Cloud Controls Catalog.
 | `SectionThreatMappings` | array of objects | Yes | Each entry has `ReferenceId` and `Identifiers`. |
 | `SectionGuidelineMappings` | array of objects | Yes | Each entry has `ReferenceId` and `Identifiers`. |

-#### Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute
+##### Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute

-The fallback attribute model used when no framework-specific schema applies (for example NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA).
+The fallback attribute model used when no framework-specific schema applies (e.g. NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, GDPR, HIPAA). It is **always the last** element of the `Compliance_Requirement.Attributes` Union; that ordering is load-bearing.

 | Field | Type | Required | Notes |
 |---|---|---|---|
@@ -158,17 +348,17 @@ The fallback attribute model used when no framework-specific schema applies (for
 | `Section` | string | No | Section name. |
 | `SubSection` | string | No | Subsection name. |
 | `SubGroup` | string | No | Subgroup name. |
-| `Service` | string | No | Affected service, for example `aws`, `iam`. |
+| `Service` | string | No | Affected service, e.g. `iam`. |
 | `Type` | string | No | Control type. |
 | `Comment` | string | No | Free-form comment. |

-Additional per-framework attribute models exist for `AWS_Well_Architected_Requirement_Attribute`, `ISO27001_2013_Requirement_Attribute`, `Mitre_Requirement_Attribute_<Provider>`, `KISA_ISMSP_Requirement_Attribute`, `Prowler_ThreatScore_Requirement_Attribute`, `C5Germany_Requirement_Attribute`, and `CSA_CCM_Requirement_Attribute`. Consult `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` for their full field sets.
+For the remaining attribute classes (`AWS_Well_Architected_Requirement_Attribute`, `ISO27001_2013_Requirement_Attribute`, `Mitre_Requirement_Attribute_<Provider>`, `KISA_ISMSP_Requirement_Attribute`, `Prowler_ThreatScore_Requirement_Attribute`, `C5Germany_Requirement_Attribute`, `CSA_CCM_Requirement_Attribute`) consult `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` for the full field sets.

 <Note>
-The `Attributes` field is a Pydantic `Union`. The generic attribute model must remain the last element of that Union, otherwise Pydantic v1 silently coerces every framework into the generic shape and your specialized fields are dropped.
+The `Attributes` field is a Pydantic `Union`. The generic attribute model **must** remain the last element of that Union — otherwise Pydantic v1 silently coerces every framework into the generic shape and your specialized fields are dropped. Adding a brand-new attribute shape requires inserting the Pydantic class **before** `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute`.
 </Note>

-## Minimal Working Example
+#### Minimal working example

 The following snippet is a complete, valid framework file named `my_framework_1.0_aws.json`, saved at `prowler/compliance/aws/my_framework_1.0_aws.json`. It uses the generic attribute shape for simplicity.

@@ -214,26 +404,26 @@ The following snippet is a complete, valid framework file named `my_framework_1.
 }
 ```

-## Mapping Checks to Requirements
+### Mapping checks to requirements

 Each requirement links to the Prowler checks that, together, produce a PASS or FAIL verdict for that control.

- **Include every requirement from the source catalog.** The framework file must mirror the full control list, one-to-one. Compliance percentages, dashboards, and exported metadata are computed against the total requirement count, so omitting an unmappable control inflates coverage and misrepresents the framework.
- List every check by its canonical identifier, the value of `CheckID` inside the check's `.metadata.json` file.
+- **Include every requirement from the source catalog.** The framework file must mirror the full control list, one-to-one. Compliance percentages, dashboards, and exported metadata are computed against the total requirement count.
+- List every check by its canonical identifier — the value of `CheckID` inside the check's `.metadata.json` file.
 - One requirement can reference multiple checks. The requirement is evaluated as FAIL when any referenced check produces a FAIL finding for a resource in scope.
- Leave `Checks` as an empty array when the requirement cannot be automated. The requirement still appears in the report, contributes to the total, and resolves to `MANUAL`. An empty mapping is valid; a missing requirement is not.
+- Leave `Checks` (legacy) or `checks.<provider>` (universal) as an empty array when the requirement cannot be automated. The requirement still appears in the report and contributes to the total.
 - Reuse checks across requirements when the same control applies in multiple places. Do not duplicate check logic to match framework structure.
- Avoid referencing checks from a different provider. A compliance file is bound to one provider, and cross-provider checks will never match findings in the scan.
+- Avoid referencing checks from a different provider. A legacy compliance file is bound to one provider, and cross-provider checks will never match findings in the scan.

-To discover available checks, run:
+To discover available checks:

 ```bash
 uv run python prowler-cli.py <provider> --list-checks
 ```

-## Supporting Multiple Providers
+### Supporting multiple providers (legacy)

-Each compliance file targets a single provider. To cover several providers with the same framework (for example CIS across AWS, Azure, and GCP), ship one JSON file per provider:
+The legacy schema binds each file to a single provider. To cover several providers with the same framework, ship one JSON file per provider:

 ```
 prowler/compliance/aws/cis_2.0_aws.json
@@ -241,15 +431,15 @@ prowler/compliance/azure/cis_2.0_azure.json
 prowler/compliance/gcp/cis_2.0_gcp.json
 ```

-Keep the `Framework` and `Version` values identical across the files so the dispatcher matches them, and change only the `Provider`, `Checks`, and provider-specific metadata.
+Keep the `Framework` and `Version` values identical across the files so the dispatcher matches them; change only the `Provider`, `Checks`, and provider-specific metadata. The CIS output formatter already supports every provider listed above.

-The CIS output formatter already supports every provider listed above. For a brand-new framework that spans several providers, add one transformer per provider in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` and extend the summary-table dispatcher accordingly. See [Output Formatter](#output-formatter).
+For a brand-new framework that spans several providers, **prefer the universal schema** — it covers every provider from a single file. If you must use the legacy schema, add one transformer per provider in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` and extend the summary-table dispatcher accordingly. See [Output Formatter](#output-formatter).

-## Output Formatter
+### Output formatter

-Prowler renders every compliance framework in two forms: a detailed CSV report written to disk, and a summary table printed in the CLI. Both are produced by the output formatter package for the framework.
+Legacy frameworks render in two forms: a detailed CSV report written to disk, and a summary table printed in the CLI. Both are produced by the output formatter package for the framework. Universal frameworks do **not** need a Python output formatter — the `outputs` config inside the JSON drives rendering — so this section applies only to the legacy schema.

-For a new framework named `my_framework`, create:
+For a new legacy framework named `my_framework`, create:

 ```
 prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/my_framework/
@@ -259,19 +449,19 @@ prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/my_framework/
 └── models.py                  # CSV row Pydantic model
 ```

-### Step 1 – Define the CSV Row Model
+#### Step 1 — Define the CSV row model

 In `models.py`, declare a Pydantic v1 model with one field per CSV column. Use existing models such as `AWSCISModel` in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/cis/models.py` as the reference. Fields typically include `Provider`, `Description`, `AccountId`, `Region`, `AssessmentDate`, `Requirements_Id`, `Requirements_Description`, one `Requirements_Attributes_*` field per attribute key, plus the finding fields `Status`, `StatusExtended`, `ResourceId`, `ResourceName`, `CheckId`, `Muted`, `Framework`, `Name`.

-### Step 2 – Implement the Transformer Class
+#### Step 2 — Implement the transformer

 In `my_framework_aws.py`, subclass `ComplianceOutput` from `prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output` and implement `transform(findings, compliance, compliance_name)`. Iterate over `findings`, match each finding to the requirements it satisfies through `finding.compliance.get(compliance_name, [])`, and append one row per attribute to `self._data`.

-### Step 3 – Add the Summary-Table Dispatcher
+#### Step 3 — Add the summary-table dispatcher

 In `my_framework.py`, implement `get_my_framework_table(findings, bulk_checks_metadata, compliance_framework, output_filename, output_directory, compliance_overview)` following the pattern in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/cis/cis.py`.

-### Step 4 – Register the Framework in the Dispatchers
+#### Step 4 — Register the framework in the dispatchers

 - Add the dispatcher call in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance.py`, inside `display_compliance_table`, with a branch such as `elif "my_framework" in compliance_framework:`.
 - Register the CSV model and transformer in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance_output.py` so the CSV file is emitted during the scan.
@@ -280,49 +470,94 @@ In `my_framework.py`, implement `get_my_framework_table(findings, bulk_checks_me
 For NIST-style catalogs that use `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute`, no custom formatter is needed. The generic formatter in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/generic/` handles them automatically, provided the JSON validates against the generic attribute schema.
 </Note>

-## Version Handling
+### Legacy-to-universal adapter
+
+At load time, every legacy file is transparently adapted to a `ComplianceFramework` via `adapt_legacy_to_universal()` (`compliance_models.py:819`), which: (a) flattens the first element of `Attributes` into a flat `attributes` dict, (b) wraps `Checks` as `{provider_lower: [...]}`, (c) infers `attributes_metadata` from the matched Pydantic class via `_infer_attribute_metadata()`. The rest of Prowler (CSV/OCSF/PDF output, CLI table) then treats both formats identically.
+
+Loader-error behaviour differs between the two entry points:
+
+- `load_compliance_framework()` (legacy) is **fail-fast**: it calls `sys.exit(1)` on any `ValidationError` (`compliance_models.py:464`).
+- `load_compliance_framework_universal()` is more lenient — it logs the error and returns `None`, so `get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal()` simply skips the broken file and keeps loading the rest.
+
+## Version handling

 Prowler matches frameworks by concatenating `Framework` and `Version`. A missing or empty `Version` collapses several frameworks to the same key and breaks CLI filtering with `--compliance`.

- Always set `Version` to a non-empty string, even for frameworks that rename editions rather than version them. Use the edition identifier (for example `RD2022`, `v2025.10`, `4.0`).
+- Always set `Version` (or `version` for universal frameworks) to a non-empty string, even for frameworks that rename editions rather than version them. Use the edition identifier (for example `RD2022`, `v2025.10`, `4.0`, `2022/2554`).
 - When the source catalog has no version, use the first year of adoption or the release date.
- Make sure the version substring embedded in the filename matches `Version`, because the CLI dispatcher reads `compliance_framework.split("_")[1]` to select the correct version.
+- For **legacy** files, make sure the version substring embedded in the filename matches `Version`, because the CLI dispatcher reads `compliance_framework.split("_")[1]` to select the correct version.

-## Validating the Framework Locally
+## Validating Your Framework

-Follow the steps below before opening a pull request.
+Before opening a PR, validate the JSON loads cleanly against the model and that every referenced check actually exists.

-### 1. Run the Compliance Model Validator
+### 1. Schema validation
+
+For **universal** frameworks, load the file and inspect what was parsed. The framework key inside `bulk` is the **basename of the JSON file** (without `.json`); for `prowler/compliance/dora.json` that key is `dora`, for `prowler/compliance/aws/cis_5.0_aws.json` it is `cis_5.0_aws`.
+
+```python
+from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import (
+    load_compliance_framework_universal,
+    get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal,
+)
+
+fw = load_compliance_framework_universal("prowler/compliance/<your_framework>.json")
+assert fw is not None, "load returned None — check the logs for the validation error"
+print(fw.framework, len(fw.requirements), fw.get_providers())
+
+bulk = get_bulk_compliance_frameworks_universal("aws")
+assert "<your_framework_filename_without_json>" in bulk
+```
+
+### 2. Check existence cross-check
+
+There is **no automatic check-existence validation** at load time. Cross-check that every check name in your framework maps to a real check directory:
+
+```python
+import os
+real = set()
+for svc in os.listdir("prowler/providers/aws/services"):
+    svc_path = f"prowler/providers/aws/services/{svc}"
+    if not os.path.isdir(svc_path):
+        continue
+    for entry in os.listdir(svc_path):
+        if os.path.isfile(f"{svc_path}/{entry}/{entry}.metadata.json"):
+            real.add(entry)
+
+referenced = {c for r in fw.requirements for c in r.checks.get("aws", [])}
+missing = referenced - real
+assert not missing, f"checks referenced in framework but not found in repo: {sorted(missing)}"
+```
+
+### 3. CLI smoke test

 ```bash
 uv run python prowler-cli.py <provider> --list-compliance
 ```

-The framework must appear in the output. A validation error indicates a schema mismatch between the JSON file and the attribute model.
-
-### 2. Run a Scan Filtered by the Framework
+The framework must appear in the output. A validation error indicates a schema mismatch.

 ```bash
 uv run python prowler-cli.py <provider> \
-  --compliance <framework>_<version>_<provider> \
+  --compliance <framework_key> \
  --log-level ERROR
 ```

 Verify that:

 - Prowler produces a CSV file under `output/compliance/` with the expected name.
- The CLI summary table lists every section in the framework.
+- The CLI summary table lists every section / pillar of the framework.
 - Findings roll up under the expected requirements.

-### 3. Inspect the CSV Output
+### 4. Inspect the CSV output

 Open the generated CSV and confirm:

- All columns defined in `models.py` appear.
- Every requirement has at least one row per scanned resource.
- Values such as `Requirements_Attributes_Section` reflect the JSON content.
+- All columns defined in `models.py` (legacy) or in `attributes_metadata` (universal) appear.
+- Every requirement has at least one row per scanned resource (when there are findings).
+- Attribute values such as `Requirements_Attributes_Section` reflect the JSON content.

-### 4. Verify the Framework in Prowler App
+### 5. Verify the framework in Prowler App

 Launch Prowler App locally (`docker compose up` from the repository root) and run a scan with the new compliance framework. Confirm the compliance page renders the requirements, sections, and status widgets correctly.

@@ -331,7 +566,7 @@ Launch Prowler App locally (`docker compose up` from the repository root) and ru
 Compliance contributions require two layers of tests.

 - **Schema tests** exercise the Pydantic models. Extend `tests/lib/check/universal_compliance_models_test.py` with a case that loads the new JSON file and asserts the attribute type matches the expected model.
- **Output tests** exercise the transformer. Mirror the structure under `tests/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` with fixtures that feed synthetic findings through the transformer and assert the resulting CSV rows.
+- **Output tests** (legacy frameworks only) exercise the transformer. Mirror the structure under `tests/lib/outputs/compliance/<framework>/` with fixtures that feed synthetic findings through the transformer and assert the resulting CSV rows.

 Run the suite with:

@@ -342,7 +577,20 @@ uv run pytest -n auto tests/lib/check/universal_compliance_models_test.py \

 For guidance on writing Prowler SDK tests, refer to [Unit Testing](/developer-guide/unit-testing).

-## Submitting the Pull Request
+## Running and listing your framework
+
+Once the file is in place, the CLI auto-discovers it:
+
+```sh
+prowler <provider> --list-compliance                                            # framework appears in the list
+prowler <provider> --compliance <framework_key> --list-checks
+prowler <provider> --compliance <framework_key>                                 # full scan + compliance report
+prowler <provider> --compliance <framework_key> --list-compliance-requirements <framework_key>
+```
+
+For end-user-facing tutorials (recommended for high-profile frameworks), add a dedicated page under `docs/user-guide/compliance/tutorials/` and register it in the `"Compliance"` group of `docs/docs.json`. See `docs/user-guide/compliance/tutorials/threatscore.mdx` as a reference.
+
+## Submitting the pull request

 Before opening the pull request:

@@ -352,28 +600,31 @@ Before opening the pull request:
    uv run pytest -n auto
    ```
 2. Add a changelog entry under the `### 🚀 Added` section of `prowler/CHANGELOG.md`, describing the new framework and the providers it covers.
-3. Follow the [Pull Request Template](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/.github/pull_request_template.md) and set the PR title using Conventional Commits, for example `feat(compliance): add My Framework 1.0 for AWS`.
+3. Follow the [Pull Request Template](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/.github/pull_request_template.md) and set the PR title using Conventional Commits, e.g. `feat(compliance): add My Framework 1.0 for AWS`.
 4. Request review from the compliance codeowners listed in `.github/CODEOWNERS`.

 ## Troubleshooting

 The following issues are the most common when contributing a compliance framework.

- **`ValidationError: field required` during scan.** The JSON is missing a required attribute field. Re-check the matching Pydantic model in `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py`.
- **All attributes collapse to `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute` values.** The Pydantic `Union` is ordered incorrectly, or the JSON matches only the generic shape. Move the generic model to the last Union position and ensure every required field is present in the JSON.
- **`--compliance` filter does not find the framework.** The filename does not match the expected pattern `<framework>_<version>_<provider>.json`, the version is empty, or the file lives outside `prowler/compliance/<provider>/`.
- **CLI summary table is empty but the CSV is populated.** The dispatcher branch in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance.py` is missing or its substring match does not catch the framework key.
- **CSV file is missing after the scan.** The transformer class is not registered in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance_output.py`, or `transform()` raises silently. Run the scan with `--log-level DEBUG`.
- **Findings do not roll up under a requirement.** A check listed in `Checks` either does not exist for that provider or is spelled incorrectly. Run `--list-checks | grep <check_name>` to confirm.
+- **`ValidationError: field required` during scan (legacy).** The JSON is missing a required attribute field. Re-check the matching Pydantic model in `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py`.
+- **All attributes collapse to `Generic_Compliance_Requirement_Attribute` values (legacy).** The Pydantic `Union` is ordered incorrectly, or the JSON matches only the generic shape. Keep the generic model in the last Union position and ensure every required field is present in the JSON.
+- **`attributes_metadata validation failed` (universal).** The root validator in `compliance_models.py:669` rejected the file. The error message lists each offending requirement; common causes are unknown attribute keys (typo or missing entry in `attributes_metadata`), enum violations, or missing required keys.
+- **`--compliance` filter does not find the framework.** For legacy: the filename does not match `<framework>_<version>_<provider>.json`, the version is empty, or the file lives outside `prowler/compliance/<provider>/`. For universal: the file is not at the top level of `prowler/compliance/` or it loaded as `None` (check logs for the validation error).
+- **CLI summary table is empty but the CSV is populated (legacy).** The dispatcher branch in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance.py` is missing or its substring match does not catch the framework key.
+- **CSV file is missing after the scan (legacy).** The transformer class is not registered in `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/compliance_output.py`, or `transform()` raises silently. Run the scan with `--log-level DEBUG`.
+- **Findings do not roll up under a requirement.** A check listed in `Checks` either does not exist for that provider or is spelled incorrectly. Run `--list-checks | grep <check_name>` to confirm, or run the check-existence cross-check from "Validating Your Framework".

-## Reference Examples
+## Reference examples

 Use the following files as templates when modeling a new contribution.

- `prowler/compliance/aws/cis_2.0_aws.json` – CIS attribute shape.
- `prowler/compliance/aws/nist_800_53_revision_5_aws.json` – Generic attribute shape.
- `prowler/compliance/aws/ccc_aws.json` – CCC attribute shape.
- `prowler/compliance/azure/ens_rd2022_azure.json` – ENS attribute shape.
- `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` – Canonical Pydantic schemas.
- `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/cis/` – Reference implementation of a multi-provider output formatter.
- `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/generic/` – Reference implementation of a generic output formatter.
+- `prowler/compliance/dora.json` — universal schema, single-provider populated (AWS), ready to extend with more providers.
+- `prowler/compliance/csa_ccm_4.0.json` — universal schema, multi-provider populated (AWS, Azure, GCP, AlibabaCloud, OracleCloud).
+- `prowler/compliance/aws/cis_2.0_aws.json` — legacy CIS attribute shape.
+- `prowler/compliance/aws/nist_800_53_revision_5_aws.json` — legacy generic attribute shape.
+- `prowler/compliance/aws/ccc_aws.json` — legacy CCC attribute shape.
+- `prowler/compliance/azure/ens_rd2022_azure.json` — legacy ENS attribute shape.
+- `prowler/lib/check/compliance_models.py` — canonical Pydantic schemas for both formats.
+- `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/cis/` — reference implementation of a multi-provider legacy output formatter.
+- `prowler/lib/outputs/compliance/generic/` — reference implementation of a legacy generic output formatter.
@@ -0,0 +1,730 @@
+---
+title: 'StackIT Provider'
+---
+
+This page details the [StackIT Cloud](https://www.stackit.de/) provider implementation in Prowler.
+
+By default, Prowler audits a single StackIT project per scan. To configure it, provide the project ID and either a service account key file path or inline service account key JSON.
+
+## StackIT Provider Classes Architecture
+
+The StackIT provider implementation follows the general [Provider structure](/developer-guide/provider). This section focuses on the StackIT-specific implementation, highlighting how the generic provider concepts are realized for StackIT in Prowler. For a full overview of the provider pattern, base classes, and extension guidelines, see [Provider documentation](/developer-guide/provider).
+
+### `StackitProvider` (Main Class)
+
+- **Location:** [`prowler/providers/stackit/stackit_provider.py`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/providers/stackit/stackit_provider.py)
+- **Base Class:** Inherits from `Provider` (see [base class details](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/providers/common/provider.py)).
+- **Purpose:** Central orchestrator for StackIT-specific logic, API authentication, credential validation, and configuration.
+- **Key StackIT Responsibilities:**
+    - Initializes StackIT SDK authentication via a service account key file or inline service account key JSON. The SDK mints and refreshes access tokens internally.
+    - Validates the service account credentials and project ID (UUID format validation).
+    - Loads and manages configuration, mutelist, and fixer settings.
+    - Provides properties and methods for downstream StackIT service classes to access credentials, identity, and configuration data.
+
+### Data Models
+
+- **Location:** [`prowler/providers/stackit/models.py`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/providers/stackit/models.py)
+- **Purpose:** Define structured data for StackIT identity and output configuration.
+- **Key StackIT Models:**
+    - `StackITIdentityInfo`: Holds StackIT identity metadata, including project ID and project name (fetched automatically from Resource Manager API).
+    - `StackITOutputOptions`: Customizes default output filenames so StackIT reports include the audited project ID.
+    - IaaS resource models such as `SecurityGroup` and `SecurityGroupRule` are defined in the IaaS service module.
+
+### StackIT Services
+
+- **Location:** [`prowler/providers/stackit/services/`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/tree/master/prowler/providers/stackit/services)
+- **Purpose:** Implement StackIT service clients and resource collection logic following the generic [service pattern](/developer-guide/services#service-base-class).
+- **Current Implementation:** The `IaaSService` collects security groups, rules, and network interface usage across supported StackIT regions.
+
+### Exception Handling
+
+- **Location:** [`prowler/providers/stackit/exceptions/exceptions.py`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/providers/stackit/exceptions/exceptions.py)
+- **Purpose:** Custom exception classes for StackIT-specific error handling, such as credential validation, API connection, and configuration errors.
+- **Key Exception Classes:**
+    - `StackITBaseException`: Base exception for all StackIT provider errors.
+    - `StackITCredentialsError`: Raised when credentials are invalid or missing.
+    - `StackITInvalidProjectIdError`: Raised when project ID is invalid or not in UUID format.
+    - `StackITAPIError`: Raised when StackIT API calls fail.
+
+## Authentication
+
+### Service Account Creation and Key Generation
+
+StackIT uses service account keys for API authentication. Service account keys are RSA key-pair based and provide secure, short-lived access tokens.
+
+### Creating a Service Account Key
+
+#### Method 1: Via StackIT Portal
+
+1. **Navigate to Service Accounts**
+   - Go to the [StackIT Portal](https://portal.stackit.cloud/)
+   - Select your project
+   - Click on **Service Accounts** in the left sidebar
+
+2. **Create or Select Service Account**
+   - If you don't have a service account, click **Create Service Account**
+   - Provide a name and description
+   - Assign necessary permissions:
+     - For IaaS security checks: `iaas.viewer` or `project.owner`
+     - For comprehensive audits: `project.owner`
+
+3. **Generate Service Account Key**
+   - Select your service account
+   - Navigate to **Service Account Keys**
+   - Click **Create key**
+   - Choose one of the following options:
+     - **STACKIT-generated key pair** (Recommended): Let STACKIT automatically generate an RSA key-pair
+     - **User-provided key pair**: Upload your own RSA 2048 public key
+
+4. **Download and Save the Key**
+   - Download the generated service account key file (JSON format)
+   - **Important**: Save the key securely - it contains your private key and will only be available once
+   - Store the key file in a secure location (e.g., `~/.stackit/sa_key.json`)
+
+#### Method 2: Via StackIT CLI
+
+```bash
+# Install STACKIT CLI (if not already installed)
+# Follow instructions at: https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-cli
+
+# Create service account key (STACKIT-generated)
+stackit service-account key create --email my-service-account@example.com
+
+# Or create with your own RSA 2048 public key
+# First, generate your RSA key pair:
+openssl genrsa -out private-key.pem 2048
+openssl rsa -in private-key.pem -pubout -out public-key.pem
+
+# Then create the key with your public key:
+stackit service-account key create \
+  --email my-service-account@example.com \
+  --public-key "$(cat public-key.pem)"
+```
+
+### Finding Your Project ID
+
+Your StackIT project ID is a UUID that can be found:
+
+1. In the StackIT Portal URL when viewing your project: `https://portal.stackit.cloud/projects/{PROJECT_ID}/...`
+2. In the project settings page
+3. Using the StackIT CLI: `stackit project list`
+
+### Passing the Service Account Key to Prowler
+
+Prowler accepts the service account credentials in two equivalent forms; both go through the same StackIT SDK flow and refresh access tokens internally.
+
+#### Option 1: Key File Path (key persisted on disk)
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+
+prowler stackit
+```
+
+Or as CLI flags:
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-service-account-key-path ~/.stackit/sa-key.json \
+  --stackit-project-id 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
+```
+
+#### Option 2: Inline Key Content (CI/CD, secret managers)
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY="$(vault kv get -field=key stackit/sa)"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+
+prowler stackit
+```
+
+Prefer the environment variable over the matching `--stackit-service-account-key` CLI flag; passing the secret on the command line leaks it through process listings and shell history.
+
+### Credential Lookup Order
+
+Prowler resolves credentials in this order:
+
+1. **Command-line arguments**:
+   - `--stackit-service-account-key`
+   - `--stackit-service-account-key-path`
+   - `--stackit-project-id`
+2. **Environment variables**:
+   - `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY`
+   - `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH`
+   - `STACKIT_PROJECT_ID`
+
+When both the inline key and the key file path are set, the inline content takes precedence.
+
+## Configuration
+
+### Command-Line Arguments
+
+StackIT-specific command-line arguments:
+
+| Argument | Description | Required | Default |
+|----------|-------------|----------|---------|
+| `--stackit-service-account-key-path` | Path to a StackIT service account key JSON file | Yes* | `$STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH` |
+| `--stackit-service-account-key` | Inline JSON content of a StackIT service account key (preferred env var: `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY`) | Yes* | `$STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY` |
+| `--stackit-project-id` | StackIT project ID (UUID format) | Yes* | `$STACKIT_PROJECT_ID` |
+| `--stackit-region` | StackIT region(s) to scan | No | All available regions |
+
+\* Required unless provided via environment variables.
+
+### Input Validation
+
+The StackIT provider performs comprehensive input validation:
+
+- **Service Account Credentials**:
+  - At least one of `service_account_key_path` (file path) or `service_account_key` (inline JSON) must be supplied; both empty raises `StackITNonExistentTokenError`
+  - When both are provided the inline content takes precedence
+  - The key file path is logged as-is; the inline content is redacted in the credentials box
+
+- **Project ID**:
+  - Must not be empty
+  - Must be a valid UUID format (e.g., `12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc`)
+  - Validated using Python's UUID constructor
+
+Invalid credentials will result in clear error messages before any API calls are made.
+
+## Available Services
+
+### IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service)
+
+- **Service Class:** `IaaSService`
+- **Location:** [`prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/iaas_service.py`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/iaas_service.py)
+- **SDK:** Uses the [stackit-iaas](https://pypi.org/project/stackit-iaas/) Python SDK
+- **Purpose:** Manages IaaS resources including security groups, servers, and network interfaces.
+
+**Supported Resources:**
+- Security Groups and Rules
+- Servers (Virtual Machines)
+- Network Interfaces (NICs)
+
+**Key Features:**
+- Automatic discovery of all security groups in the project
+- Security rule parsing with support for unrestricted access detection
+- Network interface analysis to determine whether security groups are in use
+- By default, reports only security groups attached to at least one NIC; `--scan-unused-services` includes unused security groups too
+
+## Available Checks
+
+The StackIT provider currently implements 4 security checks focused on network security:
+
+### 1. iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted
+
+- **Severity:** High
+- **Description:** Detects security groups that allow unrestricted SSH access (port 22) from the internet.
+- **Risk:** Unrestricted SSH access increases the attack surface and risk of brute-force attacks.
+- **Detection Logic:**
+  - Checks for ingress rules allowing TCP port 22
+  - Flags rules with `ip_range=None` or `ip_range="0.0.0.0/0"` or `ip_range="::/0"`
+  - Reports security groups attached to NICs by default, or all security groups when `--scan-unused-services` is enabled
+
+### 2. iaas_security_group_rdp_unrestricted
+
+- **Severity:** High
+- **Description:** Detects security groups that allow unrestricted RDP access (port 3389) from the internet.
+- **Risk:** Unrestricted RDP access enables potential unauthorized remote desktop access.
+- **Detection Logic:**
+  - Checks for ingress rules allowing TCP port 3389
+  - Flags unrestricted IP ranges (None, 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0)
+  - Reports security groups attached to NICs by default, or all security groups when `--scan-unused-services` is enabled
+
+### 3. iaas_security_group_database_unrestricted
+
+- **Severity:** High
+- **Description:** Detects security groups that allow unrestricted access to common database ports.
+- **Monitored Ports:**
+  - MySQL: 3306
+  - PostgreSQL: 5432
+  - MongoDB: 27017
+  - Redis: 6379
+  - SQL Server: 1433
+  - CouchDB: 5984
+- **Risk:** Unrestricted database access can lead to data breaches and unauthorized data access.
+
+### 4. iaas_security_group_all_traffic_unrestricted
+
+- **Severity:** Critical
+- **Description:** Detects security groups that allow all traffic from the internet.
+- **Detection Logic:**
+  - Checks for rules with `port_range=None` (all ports)
+  - Checks for rules with port range covering 0-65535 or 1-65535
+  - Flags unrestricted IP ranges
+  - Critical security misconfiguration requiring immediate remediation
+
+### Important Implementation Notes
+
+**Self-Referencing Security Group Rules:**
+
+Security group rules with `remoteSecurityGroupId` set are automatically filtered out from unrestricted access checks. These rules only allow traffic from instances within the same security group (self-referencing), not from the internet, and are therefore not flagged as security risks.
+
+**Rule Display Names:**
+
+All findings include user-friendly rule descriptions when available. If a security group rule has a description field set (the name shown in the StackIT UI), it will be displayed in the finding message along with the rule ID:
+- With description: `'Allow SSH from office' (sgr-abc123)`
+- Without description: `'sgr-abc123'`
+
+**Network Interface (NIC) Usage Filtering:**
+
+The IaaS service lists project NICs and records the security group IDs attached to them. Checks use that signal to decide whether a security group is in use:
+
+1. **Default behavior:** Report security groups attached to at least one NIC.
+2. **`--scan-unused-services`:** Report every security group, including unused ones.
+3. **FAIL logic:** Internet exposure is driven by security group rules that allow unrestricted source ranges, not by the presence of a public IP on the NIC.
+
+**Unrestricted IP Ranges:**
+
+The StackIT API represents "unrestricted" in two ways:
+- **`ip_range=null`**: No IP restriction specified (implicit unrestricted)
+- **`ip_range="0.0.0.0/0"` or `"::/0"`**: Explicitly configured to allow all IPs
+
+Both are flagged as unrestricted. A `null` value is **more permissive** than an explicit range and applies to all protocols/ports if other fields are also `null`.
+
+## Requirements
+
+### Python Version
+
+- **Minimum:** Python 3.10+
+- **Reason:** The StackIT SDK requires Python 3.10 or higher
+
+### Dependencies
+
+The StackIT provider requires the following Python packages (automatically installed with Prowler):
+
+- **stackit-core** (v0.2.0): Core SDK for StackIT API authentication and configuration
+- **stackit-iaas** (v1.4.0): IaaS service SDK for managing compute resources
+- **stackit-resourcemanager** (v0.8.0): Resource Manager SDK for fetching project metadata (e.g., project names)
+
+These dependencies are defined in `pyproject.toml` and installed automatically with:
+
+```bash
+poetry install
+```
+
+**Note:** The `stackit-resourcemanager` package enables automatic retrieval of project names for display in reports. If this package is not available, Prowler will still function normally but project names will be empty in the output.
+
+## Region Support
+
+### Supported Regions
+
+- **Available Regions:** `eu01` (Germany South) and `eu02` (Austria West)
+- **Default:** All scans use both `eu01` and `eu02` regions by default.
+
+### Multi-Region Scanning
+
+Prowler supports scanning multiple StackIT regions in a single execution. By default, it will scan all regions defined in the `stackit_regions_by_service.json` configuration file.
+
+### CLI Argument
+
+You can specify which regions to scan using the `--stackit-region` argument:
+
+```bash
+# Scan only eu01
+prowler stackit --stackit-region eu01
+
+# Scan both eu01 and eu02
+prowler stackit --stackit-region eu01 eu02
+```
+
+### Implementation Details
+
+- **Regional Clients:** Prowler generates a separate API client for each audited region.
+- **Service Iteration:** Each service (e.g., IaaS) iterates through the regional clients to fetch and audit resources.
+- **Identity Tracking:** The `audited_regions` are stored in the identity model for reporting.
+
+### Future Enhancements
+
+As StackIT adds more regions, they can be easily added to Prowler by updating the `prowler/providers/stackit/stackit_regions_by_service.json` file without requiring code changes.
+
+## Command Examples
+
+### Scan Specific Regions
+
+Scan only the `eu01` region:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --stackit-region eu01
+```
+
+Scan multiple regions:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --stackit-region eu01 eu02
+```
+
+### Scan Specific Checks
+
+Run only SSH unrestricted check:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --checks iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted
+```
+
+### Scan All Security Group Checks
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --services iaas
+```
+
+### Output Formats
+
+Generate JSON output:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --output-formats json
+```
+
+Generate HTML report:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --output-formats html
+```
+
+## Known Limitations
+
+### Current Limitations
+
+1. **Single Project Scope**: Only one project can be scanned at a time
+2. **Service Coverage**: Only the IaaS service is currently implemented
+3. **Check Coverage**: Limited to security group network security checks (4 checks total)
+4. **No Compliance Frameworks**: Compliance framework mappings are not yet implemented
+
+### Planned Enhancements
+
+- Multi-project scanning capability
+- Additional IaaS checks (volume encryption, server public IP exposure, backup status)
+- Compliance framework mappings (CIS, custom StackIT best practices)
+- StackIT CLI remediation examples in metadata
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Authentication Errors
+
+**Error:** `StackIT service account key was rejected`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Re-issue the service account key in the StackIT Portal
+2. Verify the service account key file or inline JSON content is complete
+3. Check that the service account has the necessary permissions (`iaas.viewer` or `project.owner`)
+4. Ensure the service account key is provided through `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH`, `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY`, or the matching CLI arguments
+
+**Error:** `StackIT credentials not found or are invalid`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Ensure the project ID and one service account credential source are provided
+2. Check that credentials are set via environment variables or command-line arguments
+3. Verify there are no extra spaces or newlines in the credentials
+
+**Error:** `Invalid StackIT project ID format`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Verify the project ID is a valid UUID format: `12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc`
+2. Copy the project ID directly from the StackIT Portal
+3. Ensure there are no extra spaces or quotes around the UUID
+
+### API Connection Errors
+
+**Error:** `Failed to connect to StackIT API`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Check your internet connection
+2. Verify the StackIT API endpoint is accessible from your network
+3. Check if there are any firewall rules blocking HTTPS connections
+4. Review the full error message for specific API error codes
+
+**Error:** `HTTP 403 Forbidden`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Verify the service account has the correct permissions
+2. Ensure the project ID is correct and you have access to it
+3. Check that the service account is enabled (not disabled or expired)
+4. Verify the service account key has not been revoked
+
+**Error:** `HTTP 404 Not Found`
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Verify the project ID exists and is correct
+2. Check that the IaaS service is enabled in your project
+3. Ensure you're using the correct region (eu01)
+
+### Empty Results
+
+**Issue:** No security groups or findings reported
+
+**Solutions:**
+1. Verify that security groups exist in your project
+2. Check that the IaaS service is properly configured
+3. Ensure the service account has `iaas.viewer` permission
+4. Check Prowler logs for any API errors (use `--log-level DEBUG`)
+
+### Debug Mode
+
+Enable debug logging for detailed troubleshooting:
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-project-id "your-project-id" \
+  --log-level DEBUG
+```
+
+This will show:
+- API authentication details (with inline service account keys redacted)
+- Resource discovery progress
+- Security rule parsing details
+- Any API errors or warnings
+
+## Specific Patterns in StackIT Services
+
+The generic service pattern is described in [service page](/developer-guide/services#service-structure-and-initialisation). You can find all the currently implemented services in the following locations:
+
+- Directly in the code, in location [`prowler/providers/stackit/services/`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/tree/master/prowler/providers/stackit/services)
+- In the [Prowler Hub](https://hub.prowler.com/) for a more human-readable view.
+
+The best reference to understand how to implement a new service is following the [service implementation documentation](/developer-guide/services#adding-a-new-service) and taking other StackIT services as reference.
+
+### StackIT Service Common Patterns
+
+- Services communicate with StackIT using the StackIT Python SDK, you can find the documentation [here](https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-sdk-python).
+- Service constructors receive a `StackitProvider` instance and use it to access credentials, identity, and configuration.
+- The provider builds StackIT SDK `Configuration` objects from the service account key path or inline key content.
+- Resource containers **must** be initialized in the constructor, typically as lists or dictionaries.
+- Do not manipulate `os.environ` for credentials inside services. Use the provider session and SDK configuration helpers.
+- All StackIT resources are represented as Pydantic `BaseModel` classes, providing type safety and structured access to resource attributes.
+- StackIT SDK calls are wrapped in try/except blocks, with specific handling for API errors, always logging errors.
+- **Centralized Error Handling**: Use `provider.handle_api_error(exception)` for consistent authentication error detection across all services.
+- **SDK Warning Suppression**: StackIT SDK prints deprecation warnings to stderr - use the `suppress_stderr()` context manager during SDK initialization and API calls.
+- **Unrestricted Access Detection**: In StackIT API, `None` values mean "allow all" (more permissive than explicit 0.0.0.0/0).
+  - `protocol=None` → All protocols allowed
+  - `ip_range=None` → All source IPs allowed (unrestricted!)
+  - `port_range=None` → All ports allowed
+  - `remote_security_group_id` set → Only allows traffic from the same security group (not unrestricted!)
+
+### IaaS Service Specific Patterns
+
+**Security Group Discovery:**
+```python
+# List all security groups
+security_groups = client.list_security_groups(
+    project_id=self.project_id,
+    region=region,
+)
+
+# List network interfaces to determine security group usage
+nics = client.list_project_nics(
+    project_id=self.project_id,
+    region=region,
+)
+
+# Checks report in-use security groups by default. Use --scan-unused-services
+# to include security groups that are not attached to any NIC.
+```
+
+**Centralized Authentication Error Handling:**
+```python
+def _handle_api_call(self, api_function, *args, **kwargs):
+    """Wrapper for API calls with centralized error handling."""
+    try:
+        with suppress_stderr():  # Suppress SDK warnings
+            return api_function(*args, **kwargs)
+    except Exception as e:
+        # Use centralized error handler from provider
+        self.provider.handle_api_error(e)  # Detects 401 and raises StackITInvalidTokenError
+```
+
+**Unrestricted Access Detection:**
+```python
+def is_unrestricted(rule):
+    """Check if a rule allows unrestricted access."""
+    # Filter out self-referencing rules
+    if rule.remote_security_group_id is not None:
+        return False
+    # Check for unrestricted IP ranges
+    return rule.ip_range is None or rule.ip_range in ["0.0.0.0/0", "::/0"]
+
+def is_tcp(rule):
+    """Check if a rule applies to TCP protocol."""
+    # None means all protocols (including TCP)
+    return rule.protocol is None or rule.protocol.lower() in ["tcp", "all"]
+
+def includes_port(rule, port):
+    """Check if a rule includes a specific port."""
+    # None means all ports
+    if rule.port_range is None:
+        return True
+    return rule.port_range.min <= port <= rule.port_range.max
+```
+
+## Specific Patterns in StackIT Checks
+
+The StackIT checks pattern is described in [checks page](/developer-guide/checks). You can find all the currently implemented checks:
+
+- Directly in the code, within each service folder, each check has its own folder named after the name of the check. (e.g. [`prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted/`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/tree/master/prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted))
+- In the [Prowler Hub](https://hub.prowler.com/) for a more human-readable view.
+
+The best reference to understand how to implement a new check is following the [check creation documentation](/developer-guide/checks#creating-a-check) and taking other similar StackIT checks as reference.
+
+### Check Report Class
+
+The `CheckReportStackIT` class models a single finding for a StackIT resource in a check report. It is defined in [`prowler/lib/check/models.py`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/blob/master/prowler/lib/check/models.py) and inherits from the generic `Check_Report` base class.
+
+#### Purpose
+
+`CheckReportStackIT` extends the base report structure with StackIT-specific fields, enabling detailed tracking of the resource, project, and location associated with each finding.
+
+#### Constructor and Attribute Population
+
+When you instantiate `CheckReportStackIT`, you must provide the check metadata and a resource object. The class will attempt to automatically populate its StackIT-specific attributes from the resource, using the following logic:
+
+- **`resource_id`**:
+    - Uses `resource.id` if present.
+    - Otherwise, uses `resource.resource_id` if present.
+    - Defaults to an empty string if none are available.
+
+- **`resource_name`**:
+    - Uses `resource.name` if present.
+    - Defaults to an empty string if not available.
+
+- **`project_id`**:
+    - Uses `resource.project_id` if present.
+    - Defaults to an empty string if not available (should be set in check logic).
+
+- **`location`**:
+    - Uses `resource.region` if present.
+    - Otherwise, uses `resource.location` if present.
+    - Defaults to an empty string if not available.
+
+If the resource object does not contain the required attributes, you must set them manually in the check logic.
+
+Other attributes are inherited from the `Check_Report` class, from which you **always** have to set the `status` and `status_extended` attributes in the check logic.
+
+#### Example Usage
+
+```python
+from prowler.lib.check.models import CheckReportStackIT
+
+report = CheckReportStackIT(
+    metadata=self.metadata(),
+    resource=security_group
+)
+report.status = "FAIL"
+report.status_extended = f"Security group {security_group.name} allows unrestricted SSH access from the internet."
+report.resource_id = security_group.id
+report.resource_name = security_group.name
+report.project_id = security_group.project_id
+report.location = security_group.region
+```
+
+### Common Check Pattern
+
+```python
+from prowler.lib.check.models import Check, CheckReportStackIT
+from prowler.providers.stackit.services.iaas.iaas_client import iaas_client
+
+class iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted(Check):
+    """Check if IaaS security groups allow unrestricted SSH access."""
+
+    def execute(self):
+        findings = []
+
+        for security_group in iaas_client.security_groups:
+            if not (iaas_client.scan_unused_services or security_group.in_use):
+                continue
+
+            report = CheckReportStackIT(
+                metadata=self.metadata(),
+                resource=security_group
+            )
+            report.status = "PASS"
+            report.status_extended = f"Security group {security_group.name} does not allow unrestricted SSH access."
+
+            # Check each rule
+            for rule in security_group.rules:
+                if (rule.is_ingress() and
+                    rule.is_tcp() and
+                    rule.includes_port(22) and
+                    rule.is_unrestricted()):
+                    report.status = "FAIL"
+                    report.status_extended = f"Security group {security_group.name} allows unrestricted SSH access from the internet."
+                    break
+
+            findings.append(report)
+
+        return findings
+```
+
+## Resources
+
+### Official StackIT Documentation
+
+- **StackIT Portal**: [https://portal.stackit.cloud/](https://portal.stackit.cloud/)
+- **StackIT Documentation**: [https://docs.stackit.cloud/](https://docs.stackit.cloud/)
+- **StackIT API Documentation**: [https://docs.api.eu01.stackit.cloud/](https://docs.api.eu01.stackit.cloud/)
+
+### Python SDK
+
+- **StackIT Python SDK (GitHub)**: [https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-sdk-python](https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-sdk-python)
+- **stackit-core (PyPI)**: [https://pypi.org/project/stackit-core/](https://pypi.org/project/stackit-core/)
+- **stackit-iaas (PyPI)**: [https://pypi.org/project/stackit-iaas/](https://pypi.org/project/stackit-iaas/)
+- **IaaS Models**: [https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-sdk-python/tree/main/services/iaas/src/stackit/iaas/models](https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-sdk-python/tree/main/services/iaas/src/stackit/iaas/models)
+
+### Prowler Resources
+
+- **Provider Implementation**: [`prowler/providers/stackit/`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/tree/master/prowler/providers/stackit/)
+- **IaaS Service**: [`prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/tree/master/prowler/providers/stackit/services/iaas/)
+- **Prowler Hub**: [https://hub.prowler.com/](https://hub.prowler.com/)
+- **GitHub Issues**: [https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/issues](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/issues)
+
+## Contributing
+
+If you'd like to contribute to the StackIT provider:
+
+1. **Add New Checks**: Follow the [check creation guide](/developer-guide/checks#creating-a-check) and use existing StackIT checks as templates
+2. **Enhance Services**: Implement additional IaaS resource discovery or add new services
+3. **Improve Documentation**: Add metadata enhancements, CLI remediation examples, or Terraform code samples
+4. **Report Issues**: Submit bug reports or feature requests on [GitHub](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/issues)
+
+### Quick Start for Contributors
+
+1. **Install dependencies**: `poetry install` (includes stackit-core and stackit-iaas)
+2. **Set credentials**: Export `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH` and `STACKIT_PROJECT_ID`
+3. **Run checks**: `prowler stackit`
+4. **View code**: Start in `prowler/providers/stackit/`
+5. **Add checks**: Create new check directories under `services/iaas/`
+6. **Run tests**: `poetry run pytest tests/providers/stackit/ -v`
+
+### Code Quality Standards
+
+The StackIT provider should follow the same quality expectations as the rest of the Prowler SDK:
+
+- Keep service and check logic covered by unit tests.
+- Redact inline service account keys from generated output.
+- Keep documentation aligned with the implemented services and checks.
+- Follow existing provider, service, and check patterns before adding StackIT-specific abstractions.
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@
              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-rbac",
              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-multi-tenant",
              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-api-keys",
-              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings",
-              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-alerts",
+              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings",
+              "user-guide/tutorials/prowler-alerts",
              {
                "group": "Mutelist",
                "expanded": true,
@@ -339,6 +339,13 @@
                  "user-guide/providers/scaleway/authentication"
                ]
              },
+              {
+                "group": "StackIT",
+                "pages": [
+                  "user-guide/providers/stackit/getting-started-stackit",
+                  "user-guide/providers/stackit/authentication"
+                ]
+              },
              {
                "group": "Vercel",
                "pages": [
@@ -401,7 +408,8 @@
              "developer-guide/kubernetes-details",
              "developer-guide/m365-details",
              "developer-guide/github-details",
-              "developer-guide/llm-details"
+              "developer-guide/llm-details",
+              "developer-guide/stackit-details"
            ]
          },
          {
@@ -576,6 +584,14 @@
    {
      "source": "/contact",
      "destination": "/support"
+    },
+    {
+      "source": "/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings",
+      "destination": "/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings"
+    },
+    {
+      "source": "/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-alerts",
+      "destination": "/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-alerts"
    }
  ]
 }
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ Refer to the [Prowler App Tutorial](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app) for detai

    _Commands_:

-    ```bash
+    <CodeGroup>
+    ```bash macOS/Linux
    VERSION=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name)
    curl -sLO "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/${VERSION}/docker-compose.yml"
    # Environment variables can be customized in the .env file. Using default values in production environments is not recommended.
@@ -28,6 +29,15 @@ Refer to the [Prowler App Tutorial](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app) for detai
    docker compose up -d
    ```

+    ```powershell Windows PowerShell
+    $VERSION = (Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://api.github.com/repos/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases/latest").tag_name
+    Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/$VERSION/docker-compose.yml" -OutFile "docker-compose.yml"
+    # Environment variables can be customized in the .env file. Using default values in production environments is not recommended.
+    Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/refs/tags/$VERSION/.env" -OutFile ".env"
+    docker compose up -d
+    ```
+    </CodeGroup>
+
    <Callout icon="lock" iconType="regular" color="#e74c3c">
      For a secure setup, the API auto-generates a unique key pair, `DJANGO_TOKEN_SIGNING_KEY` and `DJANGO_TOKEN_VERIFYING_KEY`, and stores it in `~/.config/prowler-api` (non-container) or the bound Docker volume in `_data/api` (container). Never commit or reuse static/default keys. To rotate keys, delete the stored key files and restart the API.
    </Callout>
@@ -118,8 +128,8 @@ To update the environment file:
 Edit the `.env` file and change version values:

 ```env
-PROWLER_UI_VERSION="5.28.0"
-PROWLER_API_VERSION="5.28.0"
+PROWLER_UI_VERSION="5.29.0"
+PROWLER_API_VERSION="5.29.0"
 ```

 <Note>
@@ -40,12 +40,6 @@ To install Prowler as a Python package, use `Python >= 3.10, <= 3.12`. Prowler i
    pip install prowler
    prowler -v
    ```
-
-    To upgrade Prowler to the latest version:
-
-    ``` bash
-    pip install --upgrade prowler
-    ```
  </Tab>
  <Tab title="Docker">
    _Requirements_:
@@ -170,6 +164,68 @@ To install Prowler as a Python package, use `Python >= 3.10, <= 3.12`. Prowler i
  </Tab>
 </Tabs>

+## Updating Prowler CLI
+
+Upgrade Prowler CLI to the latest release using the same method chosen for installation:
+
+<Tabs>
+  <Tab title="pipx">
+    ```bash
+    pipx upgrade prowler
+    prowler -v
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="pip">
+    ```bash
+    pip install --upgrade prowler
+    prowler -v
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="Docker">
+    Pull the desired image tag to fetch the latest version:
+
+    ```bash
+    docker pull toniblyx/prowler:latest
+    ```
+
+    <Note>
+      Replace `latest` with a specific release tag (for example, `stable` or `<x.y.z>`) to pin a version. Refer to the [Container Versions](#container-versions) section for the full list of available tags.
+    </Note>
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="GitHub">
+    Pull the latest changes and sync the environment:
+
+    ```bash
+    cd prowler
+    git pull
+    uv sync
+    uv run python prowler-cli.py -v
+    ```
+
+    <Note>
+      To upgrade to a specific release, check out the corresponding tag before syncing: `git checkout <x.y.z>`.
+    </Note>
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="Brew">
+    ```bash
+    brew upgrade prowler
+    prowler -v
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="CloudShell">
+    Both AWS CloudShell and Azure CloudShell install Prowler with `pipx`, so the upgrade command is the same:
+
+    ```bash
+    pipx upgrade prowler
+    prowler -v
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+</Tabs>
+
+<Note>
+  To install a specific version instead of the latest release, pin it explicitly. For example, with `pipx`: `pipx install prowler==<x.y.z>`, or with `pip`: `pip install prowler==<x.y.z>`. The available releases are listed in the [Releases GitHub section](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases).
+</Note>
+
 ## Container Versions

 The available versions of Prowler CLI are the following:
@@ -141,6 +141,45 @@ Choose one of the following installation methods:

 ---

+## Updating Prowler MCP Server
+
+When running Prowler MCP Server locally ("Option 2: Run Locally"), upgrade to the latest version using the same method chosen for installation. The hosted server (`https://mcp.prowler.com/mcp`) is always kept up to date by Prowler and requires no action.
+
+<Tabs>
+  <Tab title="Docker">
+    Pull the latest image and restart the container:
+
+    ```bash
+    docker pull prowlercloud/prowler-mcp
+    ```
+
+    <Note>
+      Recreate any running container after pulling the new image so the updated version takes effect.
+    </Note>
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="From Source">
+    Pull the latest changes and sync the dependencies:
+
+    ```bash
+    cd prowler/mcp_server
+    git pull
+    uv sync
+    uv run prowler-mcp --help
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+  <Tab title="Build Docker Image">
+    Pull the latest source and rebuild the image:
+
+    ```bash
+    cd prowler/mcp_server
+    git pull
+    docker build -t prowler-mcp .
+    ```
+  </Tab>
+</Tabs>
+
+---
+
 ## Command Line Options

 The Prowler MCP Server supports the following command-line arguments:
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ Prowler supports a wide range of providers organized by category:
 | [OpenStack](/user-guide/providers/openstack/getting-started-openstack)           | Official   | Projects                 | UI, API, CLI |
 | [Oracle Cloud](/user-guide/providers/oci/getting-started-oci)                    | Official   | Tenancies / Compartments | UI, API, CLI |
 | [Scaleway](/user-guide/providers/scaleway/getting-started-scaleway)              | [Contact us](https://prowler.com/contact) | Organizations            | CLI          |
+| [StackIT](/user-guide/providers/stackit/getting-started-stackit)                 | [Contact us](https://prowler.com/contact) | Projects                 | CLI          |

 ### Infrastructure as Code Providers

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ title: 'Run Prowler in CI/CD and Send Findings to Prowler Cloud'
 For new projects, use the official [Prowler GitHub Action](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-github-action) — a Docker-based reusable action that runs scans, optionally pushes findings to Prowler Cloud, and uploads SARIF results to GitHub Code Scanning. The GitHub Actions examples below document the legacy pip-based flow.
 </Warning>

-This cookbook demonstrates how to integrate Prowler into CI/CD pipelines so that security scans run automatically and findings are sent to Prowler Cloud via [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings). Examples cover GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.
+This cookbook demonstrates how to integrate Prowler into CI/CD pipelines so that security scans run automatically and findings are sent to Prowler Cloud via [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings). Examples cover GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.

 ## Prerequisites

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ This cookbook demonstrates how to integrate Prowler into CI/CD pipelines so that

 Prowler CLI provides the `--push-to-cloud` flag, which uploads scan results directly to Prowler Cloud after a scan completes. Combined with the `PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY` environment variable, this enables fully automated ingestion without manual file uploads.

-For full details on the flag and API, refer to the [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings) documentation.
+For full details on the flag and API, refer to the [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings) documentation.

 <Note>
 The examples in this guide use AWS as the target provider, but the same approach applies to any provider supported by Prowler (Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and others). Replace `prowler aws` with the desired provider command (e.g., `prowler gcp`, `prowler azure`) and configure the corresponding credentials in the CI/CD environment.
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ By default, Prowler exits with a non-zero code when it finds failing checks. Thi
 * **GitLab CI**: Add `allow_failure: true` to the job

 <Note>
-Ingestion failures (e.g., network issues reaching Prowler Cloud) do not affect the Prowler exit code. The scan completes normally and only a warning is emitted. See [Import Findings troubleshooting](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings#troubleshooting) for details.
+Ingestion failures (e.g., network issues reaching Prowler Cloud) do not affect the Prowler exit code. The scan completes normally and only a warning is emitted. See [Import Findings troubleshooting](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings#troubleshooting) for details.
 </Note>

 ### Caching Prowler Installation
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 title: 'Run Kubernetes In-Cluster and Send Findings to Prowler Cloud'
 ---

-This cookbook walks through deploying Prowler inside a Kubernetes cluster on a recurring schedule and automatically sending findings to Prowler Cloud via [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings). By the end, security scan results from the cluster appear in Prowler Cloud without any manual file uploads.
+This cookbook walks through deploying Prowler inside a Kubernetes cluster on a recurring schedule and automatically sending findings to Prowler Cloud via [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings). By the end, security scan results from the cluster appear in Prowler Cloud without any manual file uploads.

 ## Prerequisites

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ Once the job completes and findings are pushed:
 2. Open the "Scans" section to verify the ingestion job status
 3. Browse findings under the Kubernetes provider

-For details on the ingestion workflow and status tracking, refer to the [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings) documentation.
+For details on the ingestion workflow and status tracking, refer to the [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings) documentation.

 ## Tips and Troubleshooting

@@ -204,4 +204,4 @@ For details on the ingestion workflow and status tracking, refer to the [Import
    --namespace prowler-ns
  ```

-* **Failed uploads**: If the push to Prowler Cloud fails, the scan still completes and findings are saved locally in the container. Check the [Import Findings troubleshooting section](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings#troubleshooting) for common error messages.
+* **Failed uploads**: If the push to Prowler Cloud fails, the scan still completes and findings are saved locally in the container. Check the [Import Findings troubleshooting section](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings#troubleshooting) for common error messages.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Prowler requests the following read-only OAuth 2.0 scopes:
 | `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.domain.readonly` | Read access to domain information |
 | `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.customer.readonly` | Read access to customer information (Customer ID) |
 | `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.orgunit.readonly` | Read access to organizational unit hierarchy (identifies the root OU for policy filtering) |
-| `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-identity.policies.readonly` | Read access to domain-level application policies (required for Calendar, Gmail, Chat, and Drive service checks) |
+| `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-identity.policies.readonly` | Read access to domain-level application policies (required for Calendar, Chat, Drive, Gmail, Groups, Marketplace, Security, and Sites service checks) |
 | `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.rolemanagement.readonly` | Read access to admin roles and role assignments |

 <Warning>
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ In the [Google Cloud Console](https://console.cloud.google.com), select the targ
 | API | Required For |
 |-----|--------------|
 | **Admin SDK API** | Directory service checks (users, roles, domains) |
-| **Cloud Identity API** | Calendar, Gmail, Chat, and Drive service checks (domain-level application policies) |
+| **Cloud Identity API** | All service checks except Directory (domain-level application policies) |

 For each API:

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ For each API:
 3. Click **Enable**

 <Note>
-Both APIs must be enabled in the same GCP project that hosts the Service Account. Calendar, Gmail, Chat, and Drive checks will return no findings if the Cloud Identity API is not enabled.
+Both APIs must be enabled in the same GCP project that hosts the Service Account. All service checks except Directory will return no findings if the Cloud Identity API is not enabled.
 </Note>

 ### Step 3: Create a Service Account
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ If Prowler connects but returns empty results or permission errors for specific

 ### Policy API Checks Return No Findings

-If the Directory checks run successfully but the Calendar, Gmail, Chat, or Drive checks return no findings, the Cloud Identity Policy API is not reachable for this Service Account. Verify:
+If the Directory checks run successfully but other service checks (Calendar, Chat, Drive, Gmail, Groups, Marketplace, Security, Sites) return no findings, the Cloud Identity Policy API is not reachable for this Service Account. Verify:

 - The **Cloud Identity API** is enabled in the GCP project hosting the Service Account (Step 2)
 - The scope `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-identity.policies.readonly` is included in the Domain-Wide Delegation OAuth scopes list in the Admin Console (Step 5)
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+---
+title: 'StackIT Authentication'
+---
+
+Prowler authenticates with StackIT using a **service account key file**. The StackIT SDK signs the RSA challenge in the key file and mints/refreshes access tokens internally for the life of the scan, so no manual token rotation is needed.
+
+## Service Account Key
+
+StackIT uses RSA key-pair based service account keys. They are issued once, must be stored securely, and are read by the SDK on every scan to mint short-lived access tokens transparently.
+
+### Option 1: Create the Key via the StackIT Portal
+
+1. Open the [StackIT Portal](https://portal.stackit.cloud/) and select your project.
+2. In the left sidebar, click **Service Accounts**.
+3. Create a service account if you do not have one already. Assign:
+    - `iaas.viewer` for the IaaS security group checks currently shipped, or
+    - `project.owner` if you want to cover any future service Prowler adds.
+4. Open the service account and go to **Service Account Keys**.
+5. Click **Create key** and choose **STACKIT-generated key pair** (recommended). Download the resulting JSON file and store it securely (for example, `~/.stackit/sa-key.json`). The private material is only shown once.
+
+### Option 2: Create the Key via the StackIT CLI
+
+```bash
+# Install the StackIT CLI from https://github.com/stackitcloud/stackit-cli first
+stackit service-account key create --email my-service-account@example.com
+```
+
+## Project ID
+
+Your StackIT project ID is a UUID. You can find it in:
+
+1. The portal URL when viewing the project: `https://portal.stackit.cloud/projects/{PROJECT_ID}/...`
+2. The project settings page
+3. `stackit project list`
+
+## Passing Credentials to Prowler
+
+You can give Prowler either the **path** to the key file on disk or the **inline JSON content** of the key. Both go through the same StackIT SDK flow and refresh access tokens internally.
+
+### Option A: Key File Path (workstation, persistent agents)
+
+Recommended when the key is stored on disk.
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+
+prowler stackit
+```
+
+Or as CLI flags:
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-service-account-key-path ~/.stackit/sa-key.json \
+  --stackit-project-id 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
+```
+
+<Note>
+Keep the key file outside of source control and lock it down with `chmod 600 ~/.stackit/sa-key.json`. Anyone with the JSON can mint access tokens for the service account.
+</Note>
+
+### Option B: Inline Key Content (CI/CD, secret managers)
+
+Recommended when the key is fetched at run time from a secret manager (GitHub Actions secret, AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, etc.) and you do not want to write it to disk.
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY="$(vault kv get -field=key stackit/sa)"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+
+prowler stackit
+```
+
+<Note>
+Prefer the `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY` environment variable over the matching CLI flag (`--stackit-service-account-key`); passing the secret on the command line leaks it through process listings and shell history.
+</Note>
+
+When both the inline content and a key path are set, the inline content wins.
+
+## Credential Lookup Order
+
+Prowler resolves credentials in this order:
+
+1. CLI arguments: `--stackit-service-account-key`, `--stackit-service-account-key-path`, `--stackit-project-id`
+2. Environment variables: `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY`, `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH`, `STACKIT_PROJECT_ID`
+
+When both the inline key and the key file path are set, the inline content takes precedence.
+
+## Token Lifetime
+
+Access tokens are minted on demand by the SDK from the key file and refreshed before they expire. There is nothing to rotate while Prowler is running.
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+| Symptom | Likely Cause | Fix |
+|---------|--------------|-----|
+| `401 Unauthorized` during scan | Key file is missing fields, the public key is no longer registered, or the key was revoked | Re-issue the service account key in the StackIT portal and update `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH` |
+| `403 Forbidden` during scan | Service account lacks role on the project | Re-check role assignment in the StackIT portal; `iaas.viewer` is the minimum for the shipped IaaS checks |
+| `StackIT project ID must be a valid UUID` | The project ID is not in UUID format | Copy the UUID from the portal URL or `stackit project list` |
+| `StackIT service account credentials are required` | None of the four credential inputs is set | Export `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH` or `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY` (or use their CLI counterparts) before running Prowler |
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+---
+title: 'Getting Started With StackIT'
+---
+
+Prowler supports [StackIT](https://www.stackit.de/) from the CLI. This guide walks you through the requirements and how to run scans.
+
+<Note>
+StackIT support in Prowler is community-maintained. For commercial support or to request additional service coverage, [contact us](https://prowler.com/contact).
+</Note>
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+Before running Prowler with the StackIT provider, ensure you have:
+
+1. A StackIT account with at least one project
+2. A StackIT service account key file with permissions on the project (`iaas.viewer` is enough for the currently shipped IaaS checks; `project.owner` works for any future service). See the [Authentication guide](/user-guide/providers/stackit/authentication) for the full setup.
+3. Access to Prowler CLI (see [Installation](/getting-started/installation/prowler-cli))
+
+## Prowler CLI
+
+### Step 1: Point Prowler at the Service Account Key
+
+Prowler authenticates with a StackIT service account key. The SDK signs the RSA challenge in the key and refreshes access tokens internally for the life of the scan, so there is no manual token rotation.
+
+**On a workstation or persistent agent** (key on disk):
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH="$HOME/.stackit/sa-key.json"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+```
+
+**In CI/CD** (key in a secret manager, never written to disk):
+
+```bash
+export STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY="$(vault kv get -field=key stackit/sa)"
+export STACKIT_PROJECT_ID="12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
+```
+
+CLI flags work too:
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit \
+  --stackit-service-account-key-path ~/.stackit/sa-key.json \
+  --stackit-project-id 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
+```
+
+<Note>
+For the inline key, prefer the `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY` env var over the matching CLI flag; passing the secret on the command line leaks it through process listings and shell history.
+
+Keep the key file outside of source control and lock it down with `chmod 600 ~/.stackit/sa-key.json`. Anyone with the JSON can mint access tokens for the service account.
+</Note>
+
+### Step 2: Run Your First Scan
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit
+```
+
+Prowler will discover and audit the project's IaaS security groups across the available StackIT regions.
+
+**Scan specific regions:**
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit --stackit-region eu01 eu02
+```
+
+**Run specific security checks:**
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit --checks iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted
+
+# List all available checks
+prowler stackit --list-checks
+```
+
+**Filter by check severity:**
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit --severity critical high
+```
+
+**Generate specific output formats:**
+
+```bash
+# JSON only
+prowler stackit --output-modes json
+
+# CSV and HTML
+prowler stackit --output-modes csv html
+
+# Custom output directory
+prowler stackit --output-directory /path/to/reports/
+```
+
+**Use a mutelist to suppress findings:**
+
+```yaml
+# mutelist.yaml
+Mutelist:
+  Accounts:
+    "12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc":
+      Checks:
+        iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted:
+          Regions:
+            - "*"
+          Resources:
+            - "test-sg-id"
+          Tags: []
+```
+
+```bash
+prowler stackit --mutelist-file mutelist.yaml
+```
+
+### Step 3: Review the Results
+
+Prowler outputs findings to the console and writes reports to the `output/` directory by default:
+
+- CSV: `output/prowler-output-stackit-{project_id}-{timestamp}.csv`
+- JSON: `output/prowler-output-stackit-{project_id}-{timestamp}.json`
+- HTML: `output/prowler-output-stackit-{project_id}-{timestamp}.html`
+
+## Supported StackIT Services
+
+| Service | StackIT API | Description | Example Checks |
+|---------|-------------|-------------|----------------|
+| **IaaS** | `iaas` | Virtual machines, network interfaces, security groups | `iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted`, `iaas_security_group_rdp_unrestricted`, `iaas_security_group_database_unrestricted`, `iaas_security_group_all_traffic_unrestricted` |
+
+Additional services will be added in future releases. Track progress in the [Prowler release notes](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/releases).
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Authentication Errors
+
+If the scan fails with a 401 error, the service account key is no longer valid (revoked, rotated or the key file is incomplete). Re-issue the key in the [StackIT portal](https://portal.stackit.cloud/) and update `STACKIT_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_PATH`.
+
+### Permission Errors
+
+If checks fail with a 403 error, the service account is missing the required role on the project. Re-check the role assignment in the StackIT portal (`iaas.viewer` is the minimum for the shipped IaaS checks).
+
+For detailed setup steps, see the [Authentication guide](/user-guide/providers/stackit/authentication).
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import { VersionBadge } from "/snippets/version-badge.mdx"
 Alerts notify recipients by email when security findings match saved filter conditions. Use Alerts to track high-priority findings, monitor specific providers or services, and keep teams informed about scan results that match defined criteria.

 <Note>
-This feature is available exclusively in **Prowler Cloud** with a paid subscription.
+This feature is available exclusively in **Prowler Cloud** and **Prowler Enterprise** with a [paid subscription](https://prowler.com/pricing).
 </Note>

 ## Prerequisites
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Source: [`prowler-cloud/prowler`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler) · M
 | `provider` | yes | — | Cloud provider to scan (`aws`, `azure`, `gcp`, `github`, `kubernetes`, `iac`, `cloudflare`, etc.) |
 | `image-tag` | no | `stable` | Docker image tag — `stable` (latest release), `latest` (master, not stable), or `<x.y.z>` (pinned). See [available tags](https://hub.docker.com/r/prowlercloud/prowler/tags). |
 | `output-formats` | no | `json-ocsf` | Output format(s) for scan results. Space-separated (e.g. `sarif json-ocsf`) |
-| `push-to-cloud` | no | `false` | Push findings to [Prowler Cloud](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings). When `true`, `PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY` is auto-forwarded |
+| `push-to-cloud` | no | `false` | Push findings to [Prowler Cloud](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings). When `true`, `PROWLER_CLOUD_API_KEY` is auto-forwarded |
 | `flags` | no | `""` | Additional CLI flags (e.g. `--severity critical high`). Values with spaces can be quoted: `--resource-tag 'Environment=My Server'` |
 | `extra-env` | no | `""` | Space-, newline-, or comma-separated list of env var **names** to forward to the container (see [Authentication](#authentication)) |
 | `upload-sarif` | no | `false` | Upload SARIF results to GitHub Code Scanning |
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Source: [`prowler-cloud/prowler`](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler) · M

 ### Push findings to Prowler Cloud

-Send scan results directly to [Prowler Cloud](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings) for centralized visibility, compliance tracking, and team collaboration.
+Send scan results directly to [Prowler Cloud](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings) for centralized visibility, compliance tracking, and team collaboration.

 ```yaml
 - uses: prowler-cloud/prowler@5.25
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ To grant all administrative permissions, select the **Grant all admin permission

 The following permissions are available exclusively in **Prowler Cloud**:

-**Manage Ingestions:** Submit and manage findings ingestion jobs via the API. Required to upload OCSF scan results using the `--push-to-cloud` CLI flag or the ingestion endpoints. See [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-app-import-findings) for details.
+**Manage Ingestions:** Submit and manage findings ingestion jobs via the API. Required to upload OCSF scan results using the `--push-to-cloud` CLI flag or the ingestion endpoints. See [Import Findings](/user-guide/tutorials/prowler-import-findings) for details.

 **Manage Billing:** Access and manage billing settings, subscription plans, and payment methods.

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import { VersionBadge } from "/snippets/version-badge.mdx"
 Findings Ingestion enables uploading OCSF (Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework) scan results to Prowler Cloud. This feature supports importing findings from Prowler CLI output files that use the [Detection Finding](https://schema.ocsf.io/classes/detection_finding) class.

 <Note>
-This feature is available exclusively in **Prowler Cloud** with a paid subscription.
+This feature is available exclusively in **Prowler Cloud** and **Prowler Enterprise** with a [paid subscription](https://prowler.com/pricing).
 </Note>

 ## OCSF Detection Finding format
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 > **Skills Reference**: See [`prowler-mcp`](../skills/prowler-mcp/SKILL.md)

-### Auto-invoke Skills
+## Auto-invoke Skills

 When performing these actions, ALWAYS invoke the corresponding skill FIRST:

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Python 3.12+ | FastMCP 2.13.1 | httpx (async) | Pydantic | uv

 ## PROJECT STRUCTURE

-```
+```text
 mcp_server/prowler_mcp_server/
 ├── server.py                    # Main orchestration
 ├── prowler_hub/server.py        # Hub tools (no auth)
@@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ npm install --save-exact mcp-remote@0.1.38

 ### 2. Local STDIO Mode

-**Run the server locally on your machine**
+Run the server locally on your machine:

 - Runs as a subprocess of your MCP client
 - Requires Python 3.12+ or Docker

 ### 3. Self-Hosted HTTP Mode

-**Deploy your own remote MCP server**
+Deploy your own remote MCP server:

 - Full control over deployment
 - Requires Python 3.12+ or Docker
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ All tools follow a consistent naming pattern with prefixes:

 ## Architecture

-```
+```text
 prowler_mcp_server/
 ├── server.py                 # Main orchestrator (imports sub-servers with prefixes)
 ├── main.py                   # CLI entry point
@@ -154,17 +154,20 @@ prowler_mcp_server/

 The Prowler MCP Server enables powerful workflows through AI assistants:

-**Security Operations**
+### Security Operations
+
 - "Show me all critical findings from my AWS production accounts"
 - "Register my new AWS account in Prowler and run a scheduled scan every day"
 - "List all muted findings and detect what findgings are muted by a not enough good reason in relation to their severity"

-**Security Research**
+### Security Research
+
 - "Explain what the S3 bucket public access Prowler check does"
 - "Find all Prowler checks related to encryption at rest"
 - "What is the latest version of the CIS that Prowler is covering per provider?"

-**Documentation & Learning**
+### Documentation & Learning
+
 - "How do I configure Prowler to scan my GCP organization?"
 - "What authentication methods does Prowler support for Azure?"
 - "How can I contribute with a new security check to Prowler?"
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ This Terraform configuration creates the necessary IAM role and policies to allo

 ### Usage Examples

-#### Basic deployment (without S3 integration):
+#### Basic deployment (without S3 integration)
 ```bash
 terraform apply -var="external_id=your-external-id-here"
 ```

-#### With S3 integration enabled:
+#### With S3 integration enabled
 ```bash
 terraform apply \
  -var="external_id=your-external-id-here" \
@@ -42,14 +42,14 @@ terraform apply \
  -var="s3_integration_bucket_account_id=123456789012"
 ```

-#### Using terraform.tfvars file (Recommended):
+#### Using terraform.tfvars file (Recommended)
 ```bash
 cp terraform.tfvars.example terraform.tfvars
 # Edit the file with your values
 terraform apply
 ```

-#### Command line variables (Alternative):
+#### Command line variables (Alternative)
 ```bash
 terraform apply -var="external_id=your-external-id-here"
 ```
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 > - [`prowler-compliance`](../skills/prowler-compliance/SKILL.md) - Compliance framework structure
 > - [`pytest`](../skills/pytest/SKILL.md) - Generic pytest patterns

-### Auto-invoke Skills
+## Auto-invoke Skills

 When performing these actions, ALWAYS invoke the corresponding skill FIRST:

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ The Prowler SDK is the core Python engine powering cloud security assessments ac

 ### Provider Architecture

-```
+```text
 prowler/providers/{provider}/
 ├── {provider}_provider.py      # Main provider class
 ├── models.py                   # Provider-specific models
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Python 3.10+ | uv | pytest | moto (AWS mocking) | Pre-commit hooks (black, flake

 ## PROJECT STRUCTURE

-```
+```text
 prowler/
 ├── __main__.py                # CLI entry point
 ├── config/                    # Global configuration
@@ -2,22 +2,49 @@

 All notable changes to the **Prowler SDK** are documented in this file.

-## [5.29.0] (Prowler UNRELEASED)
+## [5.30.0] (Prowler UNRELEASED)
+
+### 🚀 Added
+
+- `sagemaker_models_monitor_enabled` check for AWS provider, verifying that each SageMaker monitoring schedule is in the `Scheduled` state so data and model drift is actively detected [(#11278)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11278)
+- DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) universal compliance framework with AWS provider coverage across the five DORA pillars [(#11131)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11131)
+
+---
+
+## [5.29.1] (Prowler v5.29.1)
+
+### 🐞 Fixed
+
+- OCSF output writer now re-raises I/O errors (e.g. `ENOSPC`) instead of logging them per finding and leaving a truncated file [(#11421)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11421)
+
+---
+
+## [5.29.0] (Prowler v5.29.0)

 ### 🚀 Added

 - `application` service for Okta provider with `application_admin_console_session_idle_timeout_15min`, `application_admin_console_mfa_required`, `application_admin_console_phishing_resistant_authentication`, `application_dashboard_mfa_required`, `application_dashboard_phishing_resistant_authentication`, and `application_authentication_policy_network_zone_enforced` checks [(#11358)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11358)
 - AWS AI Security Framework compliance for AWS provider [(#11353)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11353)
 - `storage_account_public_network_access_disabled` check for Azure provider and remapped the Azure CIS "Public Network Access is Disabled" requirements to it [(#11334)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11334)
+- StackIT provider with service account key authentication [(#9237)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/9237)
+- 8 Rules service checks for Google Workspace provider using the Cloud Identity Policy API [(#11379)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11379)
+- 12 Security service checks for Google Workspace provider using the Cloud Identity Policy API [(#11356)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11356)
+
+### ⚠️ Deprecated
+
+- `s3_bucket_default_encryption` check for AWS provider since SSE-S3 is automatically applied to all S3 buckets by AWS as of January 5, 2023 and can no longer be disabled [(#11230)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11230)

 ### 🐞 Fixed

+- Broken documentation URLs in Google Workspace check metadata [(#11405)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11405)
 - ENS RD 311/2022 (AWS) compliance mapping: `vpc_different_regions` was uncorrectly mapped under the `mp.com.4` family (Network segregation). That check is now mapped to a new `op.cont.2.aws.vpc.1` requirement under the Continuity of Service control [(#11372)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11372)
 - Compliance CSV row count now matches the UI per requirement by sourcing rows from the framework JSON's `requirement.Checks` instead of the stale `finding.compliance` snapshot [(#11370)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11370)
+- OpenStack provider exception codes moved from the `10000-10999` range, shared with the AlibabaCloud provider, to the free `17000-17999` range to keep error codes unambiguous [(#11382)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/11382)
+- Azure provider authentication against sovereign clouds (`AzureChinaCloud`, `AzureUSGovernment`) [(#10284)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/10284)

 ---

-## [5.28.1] (Prowler 5.28.1)
+## [5.28.1] (Prowler v5.28.1)

 ### 🐞 Fixed

@@ -85,11 +85,6 @@ from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance import (
    display_compliance_table,
    process_universal_compliance_frameworks,
 )
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_alibabacloud import AlibabaCloudCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_aws import AWSCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_azure import AzureCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_gcp import GCPCSA
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa_oraclecloud import OracleCloudCSA
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_aws import AWSENS
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_azure import AzureENS
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens_gcp import GCPENS
@@ -158,6 +153,7 @@ from prowler.providers.okta.models import OktaOutputOptions
 from prowler.providers.openstack.models import OpenStackOutputOptions
 from prowler.providers.oraclecloud.models import OCIOutputOptions
 from prowler.providers.scaleway.models import ScalewayOutputOptions
+from prowler.providers.stackit.models import StackITOutputOptions
 from prowler.providers.vercel.models import VercelOutputOptions


@@ -416,6 +412,10 @@ def prowler():
        output_options = OCIOutputOptions(
            args, bulk_checks_metadata, global_provider.identity
        )
+    elif provider == "stackit":
+        output_options = StackITOutputOptions(
+            args, bulk_checks_metadata, global_provider.identity
+        )
    elif provider == "alibabacloud":
        output_options = AlibabaCloudOutputOptions(
            args, bulk_checks_metadata, global_provider.identity
@@ -801,18 +801,6 @@ def prowler():
                )
                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(c5)
                c5.batch_write_data_to_file()
-            elif compliance_name == "csa_ccm_4.0_aws":
-                filename = (
-                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
-                    f"{output_options.output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
-                )
-                csa_ccm_4_0_aws = AWSCSA(
-                    findings=finding_outputs,
-                    compliance=bulk_compliance_frameworks[compliance_name],
-                    file_path=filename,
-                )
-                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csa_ccm_4_0_aws)
-                csa_ccm_4_0_aws.batch_write_data_to_file()
            else:
                filename = (
                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
@@ -916,18 +904,6 @@ def prowler():
                )
                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(c5_azure)
                c5_azure.batch_write_data_to_file()
-            elif compliance_name == "csa_ccm_4.0_azure":
-                filename = (
-                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
-                    f"{output_options.output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
-                )
-                csa_ccm_4_0_azure = AzureCSA(
-                    findings=finding_outputs,
-                    compliance=bulk_compliance_frameworks[compliance_name],
-                    file_path=filename,
-                )
-                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csa_ccm_4_0_azure)
-                csa_ccm_4_0_azure.batch_write_data_to_file()
            else:
                filename = (
                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
@@ -1031,18 +1007,6 @@ def prowler():
                )
                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(c5_gcp)
                c5_gcp.batch_write_data_to_file()
-            elif compliance_name == "csa_ccm_4.0_gcp":
-                filename = (
-                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
-                    f"{output_options.output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
-                )
-                csa_ccm_4_0_gcp = GCPCSA(
-                    findings=finding_outputs,
-                    compliance=bulk_compliance_frameworks[compliance_name],
-                    file_path=filename,
-                )
-                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csa_ccm_4_0_gcp)
-                csa_ccm_4_0_gcp.batch_write_data_to_file()
            else:
                filename = (
                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
@@ -1277,18 +1241,6 @@ def prowler():
                )
                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(cis)
                cis.batch_write_data_to_file()
-            elif compliance_name == "csa_ccm_4.0_oraclecloud":
-                filename = (
-                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
-                    f"{output_options.output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
-                )
-                csa_ccm_4_0_oraclecloud = OracleCloudCSA(
-                    findings=finding_outputs,
-                    compliance=bulk_compliance_frameworks[compliance_name],
-                    file_path=filename,
-                )
-                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csa_ccm_4_0_oraclecloud)
-                csa_ccm_4_0_oraclecloud.batch_write_data_to_file()
            else:
                filename = (
                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
@@ -1317,18 +1269,6 @@ def prowler():
                )
                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(cis)
                cis.batch_write_data_to_file()
-            elif compliance_name == "csa_ccm_4.0_alibabacloud":
-                filename = (
-                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
-                    f"{output_options.output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
-                )
-                csa_ccm_4_0_alibabacloud = AlibabaCloudCSA(
-                    findings=finding_outputs,
-                    compliance=bulk_compliance_frameworks[compliance_name],
-                    file_path=filename,
-                )
-                generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csa_ccm_4_0_alibabacloud)
-                csa_ccm_4_0_alibabacloud.batch_write_data_to_file()
            elif compliance_name == "prowler_threatscore_alibabacloud":
                filename = (
                    f"{output_options.output_directory}/compliance/"
@@ -0,0 +1,597 @@
+{
+  "framework": "DORA",
+  "name": "Digital Operational Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554)",
+  "version": "2022/2554",
+  "description": "The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.",
+  "icon": "dora",
+  "attributes_metadata": [
+    {
+      "key": "Pillar",
+      "label": "Pillar",
+      "type": "str",
+      "required": true,
+      "enum": [
+        "ICT Risk Management",
+        "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+        "Digital Operational Resilience Testing",
+        "ICT Third-Party Risk Management",
+        "Information Sharing"
+      ],
+      "output_formats": {
+        "csv": true,
+        "ocsf": true
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "Article",
+      "label": "Article",
+      "type": "str",
+      "required": true,
+      "output_formats": {
+        "csv": true,
+        "ocsf": true
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "ArticleTitle",
+      "label": "Article Title",
+      "type": "str",
+      "required": true,
+      "output_formats": {
+        "csv": true,
+        "ocsf": true
+      }
+    }
+  ],
+  "outputs": {
+    "table_config": {
+      "group_by": "Pillar"
+    },
+    "pdf_config": {
+      "language": "en",
+      "primary_color": "#003399",
+      "secondary_color": "#0055A5",
+      "bg_color": "#F0F4FA",
+      "group_by_field": "Pillar",
+      "sections": [
+        "ICT Risk Management",
+        "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+        "Digital Operational Resilience Testing",
+        "ICT Third-Party Risk Management",
+        "Information Sharing"
+      ],
+      "section_short_names": {
+        "ICT Risk Management": "ICT Risk Mgmt",
+        "ICT-Related Incident Reporting": "Incident Reporting",
+        "Digital Operational Resilience Testing": "Resilience Testing",
+        "ICT Third-Party Risk Management": "Third-Party Risk",
+        "Information Sharing": "Info Sharing"
+      },
+      "charts": [
+        {
+          "id": "pillar_compliance",
+          "type": "horizontal_bar",
+          "group_by": "Pillar",
+          "title": "Compliance Score by DORA Pillar",
+          "y_label": "Pillar",
+          "x_label": "Compliance %",
+          "value_source": "compliance_percent",
+          "color_mode": "by_value"
+        }
+      ],
+      "filter": {
+        "only_failed": true,
+        "include_manual": false
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "requirements": [
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art5",
+      "name": "Governance and organisation",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT internal governance and control framework. Senior management is accountable for ICT risk and shall enforce strong identity, authentication and least-privilege policies for privileged identities, including the root account.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 5",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Governance and organisation"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "iam_avoid_root_usage",
+          "iam_no_root_access_key",
+          "iam_root_mfa_enabled",
+          "iam_root_hardware_mfa_enabled",
+          "iam_root_credentials_management_enabled",
+          "iam_password_policy_minimum_length_14",
+          "iam_password_policy_lowercase",
+          "iam_password_policy_uppercase",
+          "iam_password_policy_number",
+          "iam_password_policy_symbol",
+          "iam_password_policy_reuse_24",
+          "iam_password_policy_expires_passwords_within_90_days_or_less",
+          "iam_securityaudit_role_created",
+          "iam_support_role_created",
+          "organizations_account_part_of_organizations",
+          "iam_user_mfa_enabled_console_access",
+          "iam_user_hardware_mfa_enabled"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art6",
+      "name": "ICT risk management framework",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall have an ICT risk management framework that is sound, comprehensive and well-documented, enabling them to address ICT risk quickly, efficiently and comprehensively and to ensure a high level of digital operational resilience. This includes continuous configuration recording, security findings aggregation and an enterprise-wide visibility plane.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 6",
+        "ArticleTitle": "ICT risk management framework"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "config_recorder_all_regions_enabled",
+          "config_recorder_using_aws_service_role",
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings",
+          "organizations_delegated_administrators",
+          "guardduty_centrally_managed",
+          "guardduty_delegated_admin_enabled_all_regions"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art7",
+      "name": "ICT systems, protocols and tools",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall use and maintain updated ICT systems, protocols and tools that are appropriate to the magnitude of operations supporting ICT functions, technologically resilient, and adequately equipped to securely process data. Cryptographic primitives, certificate hygiene and network segmentation are core to this requirement.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 7",
+        "ArticleTitle": "ICT systems, protocols and tools"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "acm_certificates_with_secure_key_algorithms",
+          "acm_certificates_transparency_logs_enabled",
+          "acm_certificates_expiration_check",
+          "ec2_ebs_default_encryption",
+          "kms_cmk_rotation_enabled",
+          "s3_bucket_secure_transport_policy",
+          "s3_bucket_default_encryption",
+          "s3_bucket_kms_encryption",
+          "vpc_subnet_separate_private_public",
+          "vpc_subnet_no_public_ip_by_default",
+          "elb_insecure_ssl_ciphers",
+          "elbv2_insecure_ssl_ciphers",
+          "elb_ssl_listeners",
+          "elbv2_ssl_listeners",
+          "cloudfront_distributions_using_deprecated_ssl_protocols",
+          "cloudfront_distributions_https_enabled",
+          "rds_instance_transport_encrypted"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art8",
+      "name": "Identification",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall identify, classify and adequately document all ICT supported business functions, roles and responsibilities, the information assets and ICT assets supporting them, and their interdependencies. They shall on a continuous basis identify all sources of ICT risk, in particular the risk exposure to and from other financial entities.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 8",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Identification"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings",
+          "macie_is_enabled",
+          "macie_automated_sensitive_data_discovery_enabled",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_not_used",
+          "ec2_elastic_ip_unassigned",
+          "ec2_networkacl_unused",
+          "secretsmanager_secret_unused"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art9",
+      "name": "Protection and prevention",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall continuously monitor and control the security and functioning of ICT systems and tools and minimise the impact of ICT risk by deploying appropriate ICT security tools, policies and procedures. Encryption at rest and in transit, blocking of public exposure, network access controls, secret management and instance hardening are central to this article.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 9",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Protection and prevention"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "kms_key_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "ec2_ebs_volume_encryption",
+          "ec2_ebs_snapshots_encrypted",
+          "ec2_ebs_public_snapshot",
+          "ec2_ebs_snapshot_account_block_public_access",
+          "s3_account_level_public_access_blocks",
+          "s3_bucket_level_public_access_block",
+          "s3_bucket_public_access",
+          "s3_bucket_policy_public_write_access",
+          "s3_bucket_public_write_acl",
+          "s3_bucket_public_list_acl",
+          "s3_bucket_acl_prohibited",
+          "s3_access_point_public_access_block",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_default_restrict_traffic",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_allow_ingress_from_internet_to_all_ports",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_allow_ingress_from_internet_to_any_port",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_allow_ingress_from_internet_to_high_risk_tcp_ports",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_allow_ingress_from_internet_to_tcp_port_22",
+          "ec2_securitygroup_allow_ingress_from_internet_to_tcp_port_3389",
+          "rds_instance_storage_encrypted",
+          "rds_cluster_storage_encrypted",
+          "rds_instance_no_public_access",
+          "rds_snapshots_public_access",
+          "secretsmanager_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "secretsmanager_has_restrictive_resource_policy",
+          "secretsmanager_automatic_rotation_enabled",
+          "dynamodb_tables_kms_cmk_encryption_enabled",
+          "sns_topics_kms_encryption_at_rest_enabled",
+          "sns_topics_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "ec2_instance_imdsv2_enabled",
+          "ec2_instance_account_imdsv2_enabled",
+          "efs_encryption_at_rest_enabled",
+          "awslambda_function_not_publicly_accessible"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art10",
+      "name": "Detection",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall have in place mechanisms to promptly detect anomalous activities, including ICT network performance issues and ICT-related incidents, and to identify potential single points of failure. Threat detection across compute, identity, storage and the API control plane is required for timely detection.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 10",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Detection"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "guardduty_is_enabled",
+          "guardduty_no_high_severity_findings",
+          "guardduty_ec2_malware_protection_enabled",
+          "guardduty_lambda_protection_enabled",
+          "guardduty_rds_protection_enabled",
+          "guardduty_s3_protection_enabled",
+          "guardduty_eks_audit_log_enabled",
+          "guardduty_eks_runtime_monitoring_enabled",
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_enumeration",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_llm_jacking",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_privilege_escalation",
+          "cloudtrail_insights_exist",
+          "inspector2_is_enabled",
+          "inspector2_active_findings_exist",
+          "ec2_elastic_ip_shodan"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art11",
+      "name": "Response and recovery",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall put in place a comprehensive ICT business continuity policy, including ICT response and recovery plans, that ensures the continuity of ICT-supported critical or important functions. Operational alarming, automated event routing and tested recovery actions are essential.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 11",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Response and recovery"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "cloudwatch_alarm_actions_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_alarm_actions_alarm_state_configured",
+          "eventbridge_global_endpoint_event_replication_enabled",
+          "sns_subscription_not_using_http_endpoints",
+          "backup_plans_exist",
+          "backup_vaults_exist",
+          "rds_instance_critical_event_subscription",
+          "rds_cluster_critical_event_subscription"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art12",
+      "name": "Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall develop and document backup policies and procedures specifying the scope of data subject to backup and the minimum frequency of the backup, as well as restoration and recovery procedures and methods. Backups must be encrypted, retained, and resources must be designed for recoverability across availability zones and regions.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 12",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "backup_plans_exist",
+          "backup_vaults_exist",
+          "backup_vaults_encrypted",
+          "backup_recovery_point_encrypted",
+          "backup_reportplans_exist",
+          "rds_instance_backup_enabled",
+          "rds_cluster_protected_by_backup_plan",
+          "rds_instance_protected_by_backup_plan",
+          "rds_instance_multi_az",
+          "rds_cluster_multi_az",
+          "rds_cluster_backtrack_enabled",
+          "rds_instance_deletion_protection",
+          "rds_cluster_deletion_protection",
+          "rds_snapshots_encrypted",
+          "s3_bucket_object_versioning",
+          "s3_bucket_object_lock",
+          "s3_bucket_cross_region_replication",
+          "s3_bucket_no_mfa_delete",
+          "dynamodb_tables_pitr_enabled",
+          "dynamodb_table_deletion_protection_enabled",
+          "ec2_ebs_volume_protected_by_backup_plan",
+          "ec2_ebs_volume_snapshots_exists",
+          "autoscaling_group_multiple_az",
+          "elb_is_in_multiple_az",
+          "elbv2_is_in_multiple_az",
+          "cloudfront_distributions_multiple_origin_failover_configured",
+          "dynamodb_table_protected_by_backup_plan"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art13",
+      "name": "Learning and evolving",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall have in place capabilities and staff to gather information on vulnerabilities and cyber threats, perform post ICT-related incident reviews, and continuously feed lessons learnt back into the ICT risk assessment process. Findings aggregation and continuous insights drive this cycle.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 13",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Learning and evolving"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "guardduty_no_high_severity_findings",
+          "inspector2_active_findings_exist",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings",
+          "cloudtrail_insights_exist"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art14",
+      "name": "Communication",
+      "description": "As part of the ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall have in place crisis communication plans enabling a responsible disclosure of ICT-related incidents or major vulnerabilities to clients, counterparts and the public. Reliable, encrypted and access-controlled notification channels are required.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 14",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Communication"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "sns_topics_kms_encryption_at_rest_enabled",
+          "sns_topics_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "sns_subscription_not_using_http_endpoints",
+          "eventbridge_bus_exposed",
+          "eventbridge_bus_cross_account_access",
+          "eventbridge_schema_registry_cross_account_access",
+          "cloudwatch_alarm_actions_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_alarm_actions_alarm_state_configured"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art17",
+      "name": "ICT-related incident management process",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall define, establish and implement an ICT-related incident management process to detect, manage and notify ICT-related incidents. Comprehensive trail logging, log integrity protection, retention and centralisation of ICT events are foundational requirements.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+        "Article": "Article 17",
+        "ArticleTitle": "ICT-related incident management process"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "cloudtrail_multi_region_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_multi_region_enabled_logging_management_events",
+          "cloudtrail_kms_encryption_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_log_file_validation_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_cloudwatch_logging_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_logs_s3_bucket_access_logging_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_logs_s3_bucket_is_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "cloudtrail_s3_dataevents_read_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_s3_dataevents_write_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_bucket_requires_mfa_delete",
+          "cloudtrail_bedrock_logging_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_log_group_retention_policy_specific_days_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_log_group_kms_encryption_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_log_group_no_secrets_in_logs",
+          "cloudwatch_log_group_not_publicly_accessible",
+          "vpc_flow_logs_enabled",
+          "ec2_client_vpn_endpoint_connection_logging_enabled",
+          "route53_public_hosted_zones_cloudwatch_logging_enabled",
+          "elb_logging_enabled",
+          "elbv2_logging_enabled",
+          "cloudfront_distributions_logging_enabled",
+          "s3_bucket_server_access_logging_enabled"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art18",
+      "name": "Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall classify ICT-related incidents and shall determine their impact based on criteria such as the number of clients affected, duration, geographical spread, data losses, and criticality of the services affected. Severity-aware threat detection across the estate underpins this classification.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+        "Article": "Article 18",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threats"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "guardduty_no_high_severity_findings",
+          "guardduty_centrally_managed",
+          "guardduty_delegated_admin_enabled_all_regions",
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "inspector2_active_findings_exist",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_enumeration",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_llm_jacking",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_privilege_escalation"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art19",
+      "name": "Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threats",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall report major ICT-related incidents to the relevant competent authority and may, on a voluntary basis, notify significant cyber threats. Detective metric filters, change-tracking alarms and reliable notification topics are needed to surface and route reportable events.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT-Related Incident Reporting",
+        "Article": "Article 19",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threats"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_authentication_failures",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_unauthorized_api_calls",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_root_usage",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_sign_in_without_mfa",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_disable_or_scheduled_deletion_of_kms_cmk",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_for_s3_bucket_policy_changes",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_policy_changes",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_security_group_changes",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_aws_organizations_changes",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_and_alarm_for_aws_config_configuration_changes_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_log_metric_filter_and_alarm_for_cloudtrail_configuration_changes_enabled",
+          "cloudwatch_changes_to_network_acls_alarm_configured",
+          "cloudwatch_changes_to_network_gateways_alarm_configured",
+          "cloudwatch_changes_to_network_route_tables_alarm_configured",
+          "cloudwatch_changes_to_vpcs_alarm_configured",
+          "sns_subscription_not_using_http_endpoints"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art24",
+      "name": "General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall establish, maintain and review a sound and comprehensive digital operational resilience testing programme, as an integral part of the ICT risk management framework. Continuous vulnerability discovery, configuration assessment and instance manageability are foundational.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "Digital Operational Resilience Testing",
+        "Article": "Article 24",
+        "ArticleTitle": "General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "inspector2_is_enabled",
+          "inspector2_active_findings_exist",
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "ec2_instance_managed_by_ssm",
+          "ec2_instance_with_outdated_ami",
+          "ssm_managed_compliant_patching"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art25",
+      "name": "Testing of ICT tools and systems",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall ensure that tests are undertaken on ICT tools and systems, on critical ICT systems supporting all critical or important functions, at least yearly. Vulnerability assessments, deprecated component detection and certificate hygiene must be tracked.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "Digital Operational Resilience Testing",
+        "Article": "Article 25",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Testing of ICT tools and systems"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "inspector2_is_enabled",
+          "inspector2_active_findings_exist",
+          "guardduty_is_enabled",
+          "guardduty_no_high_severity_findings",
+          "config_recorder_all_regions_enabled",
+          "ec2_instance_with_outdated_ami",
+          "ec2_instance_managed_by_ssm",
+          "ec2_instance_paravirtual_type",
+          "rds_instance_deprecated_engine_version",
+          "acm_certificates_expiration_check",
+          "rds_instance_certificate_expiration",
+          "iam_no_expired_server_certificates_stored",
+          "ssm_managed_compliant_patching"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art28",
+      "name": "General principles (ICT third-party risk)",
+      "description": "Financial entities shall manage ICT third-party risk as an integral component of ICT risk within their ICT risk management framework. Cross-account access, trust boundaries, organization-level controls and dependency visibility are critical to monitor third-party exposure on AWS.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Third-Party Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 28",
+        "ArticleTitle": "General principles (ICT third-party risk)"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "iam_role_cross_service_confused_deputy_prevention",
+          "iam_role_cross_account_readonlyaccess_policy",
+          "iam_no_custom_policy_permissive_role_assumption",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings",
+          "s3_bucket_cross_account_access",
+          "dynamodb_table_cross_account_access",
+          "eventbridge_bus_cross_account_access",
+          "eventbridge_schema_registry_cross_account_access",
+          "cloudwatch_cross_account_sharing_disabled",
+          "organizations_delegated_administrators",
+          "organizations_account_part_of_organizations",
+          "organizations_scp_check_deny_regions",
+          "vpc_endpoint_connections_trust_boundaries",
+          "vpc_endpoint_services_allowed_principals_trust_boundaries",
+          "vpc_peering_routing_tables_with_least_privilege",
+          "awslambda_function_using_cross_account_layers"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art30",
+      "name": "Key contractual provisions",
+      "description": "Contractual arrangements with ICT third-party service providers shall be set out in writing and include, at minimum, agreed service levels and clear allocation of rights and obligations. Privilege boundaries, least-privilege policies and absence of administrative wildcards are the technical guardrails that enforce these contractual constraints inside AWS.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "ICT Third-Party Risk Management",
+        "Article": "Article 30",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Key contractual provisions"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "iam_aws_attached_policy_no_administrative_privileges",
+          "iam_customer_attached_policy_no_administrative_privileges",
+          "iam_customer_unattached_policy_no_administrative_privileges",
+          "iam_inline_policy_no_administrative_privileges",
+          "iam_inline_policy_allows_privilege_escalation",
+          "iam_policy_allows_privilege_escalation",
+          "iam_inline_policy_no_full_access_to_cloudtrail",
+          "iam_inline_policy_no_full_access_to_kms",
+          "iam_policy_no_full_access_to_cloudtrail",
+          "iam_policy_no_full_access_to_kms",
+          "iam_role_administratoraccess_policy",
+          "iam_user_administrator_access_policy",
+          "iam_group_administrator_access_policy",
+          "iam_administrator_access_with_mfa",
+          "iam_policy_attached_only_to_group_or_roles",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "DORA-Art45",
+      "name": "Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence",
+      "description": "Financial entities may exchange amongst themselves cyber threat information and intelligence, including indicators of compromise, tactics, techniques and procedures, cyber security alerts and configuration tools. Centralised threat detection, sensitive data discovery and trail-based intelligence enable participation in such information-sharing arrangements.",
+      "attributes": {
+        "Pillar": "Information Sharing",
+        "Article": "Article 45",
+        "ArticleTitle": "Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence"
+      },
+      "checks": {
+        "aws": [
+          "guardduty_is_enabled",
+          "guardduty_centrally_managed",
+          "securityhub_enabled",
+          "macie_is_enabled",
+          "macie_automated_sensitive_data_discovery_enabled",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_enumeration",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_llm_jacking",
+          "cloudtrail_threat_detection_privilege_escalation",
+          "accessanalyzer_enabled_without_findings"
+        ]
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}
@@ -1360,7 +1360,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.1.1",
      "Description": "Ensure 2-Step Verification (Multi-Factor Authentication) is enforced for all users in administrative roles",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_2sv_enforced"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1381,7 +1383,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.1.2",
      "Description": "Ensure hardware security keys are used for all users in administrative roles and other high-value accounts",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_2sv_hardware_keys_admins"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1402,7 +1406,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.1.3",
      "Description": "Ensure 2-Step Verification (Multi-Factor Authentication) is enforced for all users",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_2sv_enforced"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1423,7 +1429,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.2.1",
      "Description": "Ensure Super Admin account recovery is disabled",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_super_admin_recovery_disabled"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1444,7 +1452,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.2.2",
      "Description": "Ensure User account recovery is enabled",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_user_recovery_enabled"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1465,7 +1475,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.3.1",
      "Description": "Ensure Advanced Protection Program is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_advanced_protection_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1486,7 +1498,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.4.1",
      "Description": "Ensure login challenges are enforced",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_login_challenges_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1507,7 +1521,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.1.5.1",
      "Description": "Ensure password policy is configured for enhanced security",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1528,7 +1544,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.2.1.1",
      "Description": "Ensure application access to Google services is restricted",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_app_access_restricted"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1570,7 +1588,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.2.1.3",
      "Description": "Ensure internal apps can access Google Workspace APIs",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_internal_apps_trusted"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1633,7 +1653,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.2.3.1",
      "Description": "Ensure DLP policies for Google Drive are configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_dlp_drive_rules_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1654,7 +1676,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.2.4.1",
      "Description": "Ensure Google session control is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_session_duration_limited"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1696,7 +1720,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "4.2.6.1",
      "Description": "Ensure less secure app access is disabled",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_less_secure_apps_disabled"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "4 Security",
@@ -1801,7 +1827,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.1",
      "Description": "Ensure User's password changed is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_password_changed_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1822,7 +1850,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.2",
      "Description": "Ensure Government-backed attacks is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_government_backed_attacks_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1843,7 +1873,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.3",
      "Description": "Ensure User suspended due to suspicious activity is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_suspicious_activity_suspension_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1864,7 +1896,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.4",
      "Description": "Ensure User granted Admin privilege is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_admin_privilege_granted_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1885,7 +1919,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.5",
      "Description": "Ensure Suspicious programmatic login is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_suspicious_programmatic_login_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1906,7 +1942,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.6",
      "Description": "Ensure Suspicious login is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_suspicious_login_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1927,7 +1965,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.7",
      "Description": "Ensure Leaked password is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_leaked_password_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -1948,7 +1988,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "6.8",
      "Description": "Ensure Gmail potential employee spoofing is configured",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_gmail_employee_spoofing_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "6 Rules",
@@ -8,7 +8,10 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.1.1",
      "Description": "Phishing-resistant MFA SHALL be required for all users",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_2sv_enforced",
+        "security_2sv_hardware_keys_admins"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -21,7 +24,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.1.2",
      "Description": "If phishing-resistant MFA is not yet tenable, an MFA method from the list of acceptable MFA methods SHALL be used as an interim solution",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_2sv_enforced"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -112,7 +117,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.4.1",
      "Description": "Google Workspace sessions SHALL re-authenticate after 12 hours",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_session_duration_limited"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -125,7 +132,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.5.1",
      "Description": "Password strength SHALL be enforced",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -138,7 +147,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.5.2",
      "Description": "Minimum password length SHALL be at least 12 characters",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -151,7 +162,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.5.3",
      "Description": "Minimum password length SHOULD be at least 15 characters",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -164,7 +177,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.5.4",
      "Description": "Password policy SHALL be enforced at next sign-in",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -177,7 +192,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.5.5",
      "Description": "Password reuse SHALL be restricted",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_password_policy_strong"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -244,7 +261,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.8.1",
      "Description": "Account recovery for super admins SHALL be disabled",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_super_admin_recovery_disabled"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -283,7 +302,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.9.1",
      "Description": "Privileged accounts SHALL be enrolled in the Advanced Protection Program",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_advanced_protection_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -296,7 +317,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.9.2",
      "Description": "Sensitive user accounts SHOULD be enrolled in the Advanced Protection Program",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_advanced_protection_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -361,7 +384,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.10.5",
      "Description": "Internal apps SHALL be allowed to access restricted Google Workspace APIs",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_internal_apps_trusted"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -402,7 +427,16 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.13.1",
      "Description": "All system-defined alerting rules SHALL be enabled with alerts sent to admin email addresses",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "rules_password_changed_alert_configured",
+        "rules_government_backed_attacks_alert_configured",
+        "rules_suspicious_activity_suspension_alert_configured",
+        "rules_admin_privilege_granted_alert_configured",
+        "rules_suspicious_programmatic_login_alert_configured",
+        "rules_suspicious_login_alert_configured",
+        "rules_leaked_password_alert_configured",
+        "rules_gmail_employee_spoofing_alert_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -506,7 +540,9 @@
    {
      "Id": "GWS.COMMONCONTROLS.18.1",
      "Description": "A DLP policy SHALL be configured for Drive",
-      "Checks": [],
+      "Checks": [
+        "security_dlp_drive_rules_configured"
+      ],
      "Attributes": [
        {
          "Section": "Common Controls",
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class _MutableTimestamp:

 timestamp = _MutableTimestamp(datetime.today())
 timestamp_utc = _MutableTimestamp(datetime.now(timezone.utc))
-prowler_version = "5.29.0"
+prowler_version = "5.30.0"
 html_logo_url = "https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/"
 square_logo_img = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/dc7d2d5aeb92fdf12e8604f42ef6472cd3e8e889/docs/img/prowler-logo-black.png"
 aws_logo = "https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38561120/235953920-3e3fba08-0795-41dc-b480-9bea57db9f2e.png"
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ class Provider(str, Enum):
    SCALEWAY = "scaleway"
    VERCEL = "vercel"
    OKTA = "okta"
+    STACKIT = "stackit"


 # Compliance
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+### Project, Check and/or Region can be * to apply for all the cases.
+### Project == <StackIT Project ID>
+### Resources and tags are lists that can have either Regex or Keywords.
+### Tags is an optional list that matches on tuples of 'key=value' and are "ANDed" together.
+### Use an alternation Regex to match one of multiple tags with "ORed" logic.
+### For each check you can except Projects, Regions, Resources and/or Tags.
+###########################  MUTELIST EXAMPLE  ###########################
+Mutelist:
+  Accounts:
+    "project_id_1":
+      Checks:
+        "iaas_security_group_ssh_unrestricted":
+          Regions:
+            - "*"
+          Resources:
+            - "sg-production-ssh"
+            - "sg-development-rdp"
+          Tags:
+            - "environment=dev"
+    "project_id_2":
+      Checks:
+        "*":
+          Regions:
+            - "eu01"
+          Resources:
+            - ".*-test$"
@@ -1230,6 +1230,31 @@ class CheckReportNHN(Check_Report):
        self.location = getattr(resource, "location", "kr1")


+@dataclass
+class CheckReportStackIT(Check_Report):
+    """Contains the StackIT Check's finding information."""
+
+    resource_name: str
+    resource_id: str
+    project_id: str
+    location: str
+
+    def __init__(self, metadata: Dict, resource: Any) -> None:
+        """Initialize the StackIT Check's finding information.
+
+        Args:
+            metadata: The metadata of the check.
+            resource: Basic information about the resource. Defaults to None.
+        """
+        super().__init__(metadata, resource)
+        self.resource_name = getattr(
+            resource, "name", getattr(resource, "resource_name", "")
+        )
+        self.resource_id = getattr(resource, "id", getattr(resource, "resource_id", ""))
+        self.project_id = getattr(resource, "project_id", "")
+        self.location = getattr(resource, "region", getattr(resource, "location", ""))
+
+
@dataclass
 class CheckReportOpenStack(Check_Report):
    """Contains the OpenStack Check's finding information."""
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ class ProwlerArgumentParser:
        self.parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
            prog="prowler",
            formatter_class=RawTextHelpFormatter,
-            usage="prowler [-h] [--version] {aws,azure,gcp,kubernetes,m365,github,googleworkspace,okta,nhn,mongodbatlas,oraclecloud,alibabacloud,cloudflare,openstack,scaleway,vercel,dashboard,iac,image,llm} ...",
+            usage="prowler [-h] [--version] {aws,azure,gcp,kubernetes,m365,github,googleworkspace,okta,nhn,mongodbatlas,oraclecloud,alibabacloud,cloudflare,openstack,scaleway,stackit,vercel,dashboard,iac,image,llm} ...",
            epilog="""
 Available Cloud Providers:
-  {aws,azure,gcp,kubernetes,m365,github,googleworkspace,okta,iac,llm,image,nhn,mongodbatlas,oraclecloud,alibabacloud,cloudflare,openstack,scaleway,vercel}
+  {aws,azure,gcp,kubernetes,m365,github,googleworkspace,okta,iac,llm,image,nhn,mongodbatlas,oraclecloud,alibabacloud,cloudflare,openstack,scaleway,stackit,vercel}
    aws                 AWS Provider
    azure               Azure Provider
    gcp                 GCP Provider
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Available Cloud Providers:
    cloudflare          Cloudflare Provider
    oraclecloud         Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Provider
    openstack           OpenStack Provider
+    stackit             StackIT Provider
    alibabacloud        Alibaba Cloud Provider
    iac                 IaC Provider
    llm                 LLM Provider (Beta)
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.cis.cis import get_cis_table
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_check import (  # noqa: F401 - re-export for backward compatibility
    get_check_compliance,
 )
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.csa import get_csa_table
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.ens.ens import get_ens_table
 from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.generic.generic_table import (
    get_generic_compliance_table,
@@ -33,24 +32,28 @@ def process_universal_compliance_frameworks(
    output_filename: str,
    provider: str,
    generated_outputs: dict,
+    from_cli: bool = True,
+    is_last: bool = True,
 ) -> set:
    """Process universal compliance frameworks, generating CSV and OCSF outputs.

    For each framework in *input_compliance_frameworks* that exists in
-    *universal_frameworks* and has an outputs.table_config, this function
-    creates both a CSV (UniversalComplianceOutput) and an OCSF JSON
-    (OCSFComplianceOutput) file.  OCSF is always generated regardless of
+    *universal_frameworks* and has an ``outputs.table_config``, this function
+    writes both a CSV (``UniversalComplianceOutput``) and an OCSF JSON
+    (``OCSFComplianceOutput``) file. OCSF is always generated regardless of
    the user's ``--output-formats`` flag.

-    The function is idempotent: it tracks already-created writers via
-    ``generated_outputs["compliance"]`` keyed by ``file_path``. If invoked
-    again for the same framework (e.g. once per streaming batch), it
-    reuses the existing writer instead of recreating it. This guarantees
-    one output writer per framework for the whole execution and keeps
-    the OCSF JSON array valid across multiple calls.
+    Streaming-aware: writers are tracked via ``generated_outputs["compliance"]``
+    keyed by ``file_path``. On the first call per framework a new writer is
+    created and emits both findings and manual requirements; subsequent calls
+    reuse the writer, transform only the new ``finding_outputs`` (manual
+    requirements are not re-emitted), and append to the open file. Set
+    ``from_cli=False`` and ``is_last=False`` for intermediate batches; pass
+    ``is_last=True`` on the final batch to close the file (OCSF is also
+    finalized as a valid JSON array).

-    Returns the set of framework names that were processed so the caller
-    can remove them before entering the legacy per-provider output loop.
+    Returns the set of framework names processed so the caller can subtract
+    them from the legacy per-provider output loop.
    """
    from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.universal.ocsf_compliance import (
        OCSFComplianceOutput,
@@ -65,6 +68,13 @@ def process_universal_compliance_frameworks(
        if isinstance(out, (UniversalComplianceOutput, OCSFComplianceOutput))
    }

+    def _flush(writer, framework, label, is_new):
+        if not is_new:
+            writer._transform(finding_outputs, framework, label, include_manual=False)
+        writer.close_file = is_last
+        writer.batch_write_data_to_file()
+        writer._data.clear()
+
    processed = set()
    for compliance_name in input_compliance_frameworks:
        if not (
@@ -75,37 +85,46 @@ def process_universal_compliance_frameworks(
            continue

        fw = universal_frameworks[compliance_name]
+        compliance_label = (
+            fw.framework + "-" + fw.version if fw.version else fw.framework
+        )

        # CSV output
        csv_path = (
            f"{output_directory}/compliance/" f"{output_filename}_{compliance_name}.csv"
        )
-        if csv_path not in existing_writers:
-            output = UniversalComplianceOutput(
+        csv_writer = existing_writers.get(csv_path)
+        csv_is_new = csv_writer is None
+        if csv_is_new:
+            csv_writer = UniversalComplianceOutput(
                findings=finding_outputs,
                framework=fw,
                file_path=csv_path,
+                from_cli=from_cli,
                provider=provider,
            )
-            generated_outputs["compliance"].append(output)
-            existing_writers[csv_path] = output
-            output.batch_write_data_to_file()
+            generated_outputs["compliance"].append(csv_writer)
+            existing_writers[csv_path] = csv_writer
+        _flush(csv_writer, fw, compliance_label, csv_is_new)

        # OCSF output (always generated for universal frameworks)
        ocsf_path = (
            f"{output_directory}/compliance/"
            f"{output_filename}_{compliance_name}.ocsf.json"
        )
-        if ocsf_path not in existing_writers:
-            ocsf_output = OCSFComplianceOutput(
+        ocsf_writer = existing_writers.get(ocsf_path)
+        ocsf_is_new = ocsf_writer is None
+        if ocsf_is_new:
+            ocsf_writer = OCSFComplianceOutput(
                findings=finding_outputs,
                framework=fw,
                file_path=ocsf_path,
+                from_cli=from_cli,
                provider=provider,
            )
-            generated_outputs["compliance"].append(ocsf_output)
-            existing_writers[ocsf_path] = ocsf_output
-            ocsf_output.batch_write_data_to_file()
+            generated_outputs["compliance"].append(ocsf_writer)
+            existing_writers[ocsf_path] = ocsf_writer
+        _flush(ocsf_writer, fw, compliance_label, ocsf_is_new)

        processed.add(compliance_name)

@@ -206,15 +225,6 @@ def display_compliance_table(
                output_directory,
                compliance_overview,
            )
-        elif compliance_framework.startswith("csa_ccm_"):
-            get_csa_table(
-                findings,
-                bulk_checks_metadata,
-                compliance_framework,
-                output_filename,
-                output_directory,
-                compliance_overview,
-            )
        elif compliance_framework.startswith("c5_"):
            get_c5_table(
                findings,
@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
-from colorama import Fore, Style
-from tabulate import tabulate
-
-from prowler.config.config import orange_color
-
-
-def get_csa_table(
-    findings: list,
-    bulk_checks_metadata: dict,
-    compliance_framework: str,
-    output_filename: str,
-    output_directory: str,
-    compliance_overview: bool,
-):
-    section_table = {
-        "Provider": [],
-        "Section": [],
-        "Status": [],
-        "Muted": [],
-    }
-    pass_count = []
-    fail_count = []
-    muted_count = []
-    sections = {}
-    for index, finding in enumerate(findings):
-        check = bulk_checks_metadata[finding.check_metadata.CheckID]
-        check_compliances = check.Compliance
-        for compliance in check_compliances:
-            if (
-                compliance.Framework == "CSA-CCM"
-                and compliance.Version in compliance_framework
-            ):
-                for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        section = attribute.Section
-
-                        if section not in sections:
-                            sections[section] = {"FAIL": 0, "PASS": 0, "Muted": 0}
-
-                        if finding.muted:
-                            if index not in muted_count:
-                                muted_count.append(index)
-                                sections[section]["Muted"] += 1
-                        else:
-                            if finding.status == "FAIL" and index not in fail_count:
-                                fail_count.append(index)
-                                sections[section]["FAIL"] += 1
-                            elif finding.status == "PASS" and index not in pass_count:
-                                pass_count.append(index)
-                                sections[section]["PASS"] += 1
-
-    sections = dict(sorted(sections.items()))
-    for section in sections:
-        section_table["Provider"].append(compliance.Provider)
-        section_table["Section"].append(section)
-        if sections[section]["FAIL"] > 0:
-            section_table["Status"].append(
-                f"{Fore.RED}FAIL({sections[section]['FAIL']}){Style.RESET_ALL}"
-            )
-        else:
-            if sections[section]["PASS"] > 0:
-                section_table["Status"].append(
-                    f"{Fore.GREEN}PASS({sections[section]['PASS']}){Style.RESET_ALL}"
-                )
-            else:
-                section_table["Status"].append(f"{Fore.GREEN}PASS{Style.RESET_ALL}")
-        section_table["Muted"].append(
-            f"{orange_color}{sections[section]['Muted']}{Style.RESET_ALL}"
-        )
-
-    if (
-        len(fail_count) + len(pass_count) + len(muted_count) > 1
-    ):  # If there are no resources, don't print the compliance table
-        print(
-            f"\nCompliance Status of {Fore.YELLOW}{compliance_framework.upper()}{Style.RESET_ALL} Framework:"
-        )
-        total_findings_count = len(fail_count) + len(pass_count) + len(muted_count)
-        overview_table = [
-            [
-                f"{Fore.RED}{round(len(fail_count) / total_findings_count * 100, 2)}% ({len(fail_count)}) FAIL{Style.RESET_ALL}",
-                f"{Fore.GREEN}{round(len(pass_count) / total_findings_count * 100, 2)}% ({len(pass_count)}) PASS{Style.RESET_ALL}",
-                f"{orange_color}{round(len(muted_count) / total_findings_count * 100, 2)}% ({len(muted_count)}) MUTED{Style.RESET_ALL}",
-            ]
-        ]
-        print(tabulate(overview_table, tablefmt="rounded_grid"))
-        if not compliance_overview:
-            if len(fail_count) > 0 and len(section_table["Section"]) > 0:
-                print(
-                    f"\nFramework {Fore.YELLOW}{compliance_framework.upper()}{Style.RESET_ALL} Results:"
-                )
-                print(
-                    tabulate(
-                        section_table,
-                        tablefmt="rounded_grid",
-                        headers="keys",
-                    )
-                )
-                print(f"\nDetailed results of {compliance_framework.upper()} are in:")
-                print(
-                    f" - CSV: {output_directory}/compliance/{output_filename}_{compliance_framework}.csv\n"
-                )
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-from prowler.config.config import timestamp
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output import ComplianceOutput
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.models import AlibabaCloudCSAModel
-from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding
-
-
-class AlibabaCloudCSA(ComplianceOutput):
-    """
-    This class represents the Alibaba Cloud CSA compliance output.
-
-    Attributes:
-        - _data (list): A list to store transformed data from findings.
-        - _file_descriptor (TextIOWrapper): A file descriptor to write data to a file.
-
-    Methods:
-        - transform: Transforms findings into Alibaba Cloud CSA compliance format.
-    """
-
-    def transform(
-        self,
-        findings: list[Finding],
-        compliance: Compliance,
-        compliance_name: str,
-    ) -> None:
-        """
-        Transforms a list of findings into Alibaba Cloud CSA compliance format.
-
-        Parameters:
-            - findings (list): A list of findings.
-            - compliance (Compliance): A compliance model.
-            - compliance_name (str): The name of the compliance model.
-
-        Returns:
-            - None
-        """
-        for finding in findings:
-            for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                # Source of truth: framework JSON, not finding.compliance snapshot (avoids CSV/UI count drift).
-                if finding.check_id in requirement.Checks:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        compliance_row = AlibabaCloudCSAModel(
-                            Provider=finding.provider,
-                            Description=compliance.Description,
-                            AccountId=finding.account_uid,
-                            Region=finding.region,
-                            AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                            Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                            Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                            Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                            Status=finding.status,
-                            StatusExtended=finding.status_extended,
-                            ResourceId=finding.resource_uid,
-                            ResourceName=finding.resource_name,
-                            CheckId=finding.check_id,
-                            Muted=finding.muted,
-                            Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                            Name=compliance.Name,
-                        )
-                        self._data.append(compliance_row)
-        # Add manual requirements to the compliance output
-        for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-            if not requirement.Checks:
-                for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                    compliance_row = AlibabaCloudCSAModel(
-                        Provider=compliance.Provider.lower(),
-                        Description=compliance.Description,
-                        AccountId="",
-                        Region="",
-                        AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                        Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                        Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                        Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                        Status="MANUAL",
-                        StatusExtended="Manual check",
-                        ResourceId="manual_check",
-                        ResourceName="Manual check",
-                        CheckId="manual",
-                        Muted=False,
-                        Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                        Name=compliance.Name,
-                    )
-                    self._data.append(compliance_row)
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-from prowler.config.config import timestamp
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output import ComplianceOutput
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.models import AWSCSAModel
-from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding
-
-
-class AWSCSA(ComplianceOutput):
-    """
-    This class represents the AWS CSA compliance output.
-
-    Attributes:
-        - _data (list): A list to store transformed data from findings.
-        - _file_descriptor (TextIOWrapper): A file descriptor to write data to a file.
-
-    Methods:
-        - transform: Transforms findings into AWS CSA compliance format.
-    """
-
-    def transform(
-        self,
-        findings: list[Finding],
-        compliance: Compliance,
-        compliance_name: str,
-    ) -> None:
-        """
-        Transforms a list of findings into AWS CSA compliance format.
-
-        Parameters:
-            - findings (list): A list of findings.
-            - compliance (Compliance): A compliance model.
-            - compliance_name (str): The name of the compliance model.
-
-        Returns:
-            - None
-        """
-        for finding in findings:
-            for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                # Source of truth: framework JSON, not finding.compliance snapshot (avoids CSV/UI count drift).
-                if finding.check_id in requirement.Checks:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        compliance_row = AWSCSAModel(
-                            Provider=finding.provider,
-                            Description=compliance.Description,
-                            AccountId=finding.account_uid,
-                            Region=finding.region,
-                            AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                            Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                            Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                            Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                            Status=finding.status,
-                            StatusExtended=finding.status_extended,
-                            ResourceId=finding.resource_uid,
-                            ResourceName=finding.resource_name,
-                            CheckId=finding.check_id,
-                            Muted=finding.muted,
-                            Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                            Name=compliance.Name,
-                        )
-                        self._data.append(compliance_row)
-        # Add manual requirements to the compliance output
-        for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-            if not requirement.Checks:
-                for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                    compliance_row = AWSCSAModel(
-                        Provider=compliance.Provider.lower(),
-                        Description=compliance.Description,
-                        AccountId="",
-                        Region="",
-                        AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                        Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                        Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                        Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                        Status="MANUAL",
-                        StatusExtended="Manual check",
-                        ResourceId="manual_check",
-                        ResourceName="Manual check",
-                        CheckId="manual",
-                        Muted=False,
-                        Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                        Name=compliance.Name,
-                    )
-                    self._data.append(compliance_row)
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-from prowler.config.config import timestamp
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output import ComplianceOutput
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.models import AzureCSAModel
-from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding
-
-
-class AzureCSA(ComplianceOutput):
-    """
-    This class represents the Azure CSA compliance output.
-
-    Attributes:
-        - _data (list): A list to store transformed data from findings.
-        - _file_descriptor (TextIOWrapper): A file descriptor to write data to a file.
-
-    Methods:
-        - transform: Transforms findings into Azure CSA compliance format.
-    """
-
-    def transform(
-        self,
-        findings: list[Finding],
-        compliance: Compliance,
-        compliance_name: str,
-    ) -> None:
-        """
-        Transforms a list of findings into Azure CSA compliance format.
-
-        Parameters:
-            - findings (list): A list of findings.
-            - compliance (Compliance): A compliance model.
-            - compliance_name (str): The name of the compliance model.
-
-        Returns:
-            - None
-        """
-        for finding in findings:
-            for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                # Source of truth: framework JSON, not finding.compliance snapshot (avoids CSV/UI count drift).
-                if finding.check_id in requirement.Checks:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        compliance_row = AzureCSAModel(
-                            Provider=finding.provider,
-                            Description=compliance.Description,
-                            SubscriptionId=finding.account_uid,
-                            Location=finding.region,
-                            AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                            Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                            Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                            Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                            Status=finding.status,
-                            StatusExtended=finding.status_extended,
-                            ResourceId=finding.resource_uid,
-                            ResourceName=finding.resource_name,
-                            CheckId=finding.check_id,
-                            Muted=finding.muted,
-                            Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                            Name=compliance.Name,
-                        )
-                        self._data.append(compliance_row)
-        # Add manual requirements to the compliance output
-        for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-            if not requirement.Checks:
-                for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                    compliance_row = AzureCSAModel(
-                        Provider=compliance.Provider.lower(),
-                        Description=compliance.Description,
-                        SubscriptionId="",
-                        Location="",
-                        AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                        Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                        Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                        Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                        Status="MANUAL",
-                        StatusExtended="Manual check",
-                        ResourceId="manual_check",
-                        ResourceName="Manual check",
-                        CheckId="manual",
-                        Muted=False,
-                        Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                        Name=compliance.Name,
-                    )
-                    self._data.append(compliance_row)
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-from prowler.config.config import timestamp
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output import ComplianceOutput
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.models import GCPCSAModel
-from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding
-
-
-class GCPCSA(ComplianceOutput):
-    """
-    This class represents the GCP CSA compliance output.
-
-    Attributes:
-        - _data (list): A list to store transformed data from findings.
-        - _file_descriptor (TextIOWrapper): A file descriptor to write data to a file.
-
-    Methods:
-        - transform: Transforms findings into GCP CSA compliance format.
-    """
-
-    def transform(
-        self,
-        findings: list[Finding],
-        compliance: Compliance,
-        compliance_name: str,
-    ) -> None:
-        """
-        Transforms a list of findings into GCP CSA compliance format.
-
-        Parameters:
-            - findings (list): A list of findings.
-            - compliance (Compliance): A compliance model.
-            - compliance_name (str): The name of the compliance model.
-
-        Returns:
-            - None
-        """
-        for finding in findings:
-            for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                # Source of truth: framework JSON, not finding.compliance snapshot (avoids CSV/UI count drift).
-                if finding.check_id in requirement.Checks:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        compliance_row = GCPCSAModel(
-                            Provider=finding.provider,
-                            Description=compliance.Description,
-                            ProjectId=finding.account_uid,
-                            Location=finding.region,
-                            AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                            Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                            Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                            Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                            Status=finding.status,
-                            StatusExtended=finding.status_extended,
-                            ResourceId=finding.resource_uid,
-                            ResourceName=finding.resource_name,
-                            CheckId=finding.check_id,
-                            Muted=finding.muted,
-                            Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                            Name=compliance.Name,
-                        )
-                        self._data.append(compliance_row)
-        # Add manual requirements to the compliance output
-        for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-            if not requirement.Checks:
-                for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                    compliance_row = GCPCSAModel(
-                        Provider=compliance.Provider.lower(),
-                        Description=compliance.Description,
-                        ProjectId="",
-                        Location="",
-                        AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                        Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                        Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                        Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                        Status="MANUAL",
-                        StatusExtended="Manual check",
-                        ResourceId="manual_check",
-                        ResourceName="Manual check",
-                        CheckId="manual",
-                        Muted=False,
-                        Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                        Name=compliance.Name,
-                    )
-                    self._data.append(compliance_row)
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-from prowler.config.config import timestamp
-from prowler.lib.check.compliance_models import Compliance
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.compliance_output import ComplianceOutput
-from prowler.lib.outputs.compliance.csa.models import OracleCloudCSAModel
-from prowler.lib.outputs.finding import Finding
-
-
-class OracleCloudCSA(ComplianceOutput):
-    """
-    This class represents the OracleCloud CSA compliance output.
-
-    Attributes:
-        - _data (list): A list to store transformed data from findings.
-        - _file_descriptor (TextIOWrapper): A file descriptor to write data to a file.
-
-    Methods:
-        - transform: Transforms findings into OracleCloud CSA compliance format.
-    """
-
-    def transform(
-        self,
-        findings: list[Finding],
-        compliance: Compliance,
-        compliance_name: str,
-    ) -> None:
-        """
-        Transforms a list of findings into OracleCloud CSA compliance format.
-
-        Parameters:
-            - findings (list): A list of findings.
-            - compliance (Compliance): A compliance model.
-            - compliance_name (str): The name of the compliance model.
-
-        Returns:
-            - None
-        """
-        for finding in findings:
-            for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-                # Source of truth: framework JSON, not finding.compliance snapshot (avoids CSV/UI count drift).
-                if finding.check_id in requirement.Checks:
-                    for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                        compliance_row = OracleCloudCSAModel(
-                            Provider=finding.provider,
-                            Description=compliance.Description,
-                            TenancyId=finding.account_uid,
-                            Region=finding.region,
-                            AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                            Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                            Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                            Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                            Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                            Status=finding.status,
-                            StatusExtended=finding.status_extended,
-                            ResourceId=finding.resource_uid,
-                            ResourceName=finding.resource_name,
-                            CheckId=finding.check_id,
-                            Muted=finding.muted,
-                            Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                            Name=compliance.Name,
-                        )
-                        self._data.append(compliance_row)
-        # Add manual requirements to the compliance output
-        for requirement in compliance.Requirements:
-            if not requirement.Checks:
-                for attribute in requirement.Attributes:
-                    compliance_row = OracleCloudCSAModel(
-                        Provider=compliance.Provider.lower(),
-                        Description=compliance.Description,
-                        TenancyId="",
-                        Region="",
-                        AssessmentDate=str(timestamp),
-                        Requirements_Id=requirement.Id,
-                        Requirements_Description=requirement.Description,
-                        Requirements_Name=requirement.Name,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_Section=attribute.Section,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite=attribute.CCMLite,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_IaaS=attribute.IaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_PaaS=attribute.PaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_SaaS=attribute.SaaS,
-                        Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability=attribute.ScopeApplicability,
-                        Status="MANUAL",
-                        StatusExtended="Manual check",
-                        ResourceId="manual_check",
-                        ResourceName="Manual check",
-                        CheckId="manual",
-                        Muted=False,
-                        Framework=compliance.Framework,
-                        Name=compliance.Name,
-                    )
-                    self._data.append(compliance_row)
@@ -1,146 +0,0 @@
-from pydantic.v1 import BaseModel
-
-
-class AWSCSAModel(BaseModel):
-    """
-    AWSCSAModel generates a finding's output in CSV CSA format for AWS.
-    """
-
-    Provider: str
-    Description: str
-    AccountId: str
-    Region: str
-    AssessmentDate: str
-    Requirements_Id: str
-    Requirements_Description: str
-    Requirements_Name: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_Section: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_IaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_PaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_SaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability: list[dict]
-    Status: str
-    StatusExtended: str
-    ResourceId: str
-    CheckId: str
-    Muted: bool
-    ResourceName: str
-    Framework: str
-    Name: str
-
-
-class GCPCSAModel(BaseModel):
-    """
-    GCPCSAModel generates a finding's output in CSV CSA format for GCP.
-    """
-
-    Provider: str
-    Description: str
-    ProjectId: str
-    Location: str
-    AssessmentDate: str
-    Requirements_Id: str
-    Requirements_Description: str
-    Requirements_Name: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_Section: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_IaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_PaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_SaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability: list[dict]
-    Status: str
-    StatusExtended: str
-    ResourceId: str
-    CheckId: str
-    Muted: bool
-    ResourceName: str
-    Framework: str
-    Name: str
-
-
-class OracleCloudCSAModel(BaseModel):
-    """
-    OracleCloudCSAModel generates a finding's output in CSV CSA format for OracleCloud.
-    """
-
-    Provider: str
-    Description: str
-    TenancyId: str
-    Region: str
-    AssessmentDate: str
-    Requirements_Id: str
-    Requirements_Description: str
-    Requirements_Name: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_Section: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_IaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_PaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_SaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability: list[dict]
-    Status: str
-    StatusExtended: str
-    ResourceId: str
-    CheckId: str
-    Muted: bool
-    ResourceName: str
-    Framework: str
-    Name: str
-
-
-class AlibabaCloudCSAModel(BaseModel):
-    """
-    AlibabaCloudCSAModel generates a finding's output in CSV CSA format for Alibaba Cloud.
-    """
-
-    Provider: str
-    Description: str
-    AccountId: str
-    Region: str
-    AssessmentDate: str
-    Requirements_Id: str
-    Requirements_Description: str
-    Requirements_Name: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_Section: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_IaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_PaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_SaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability: list[dict]
-    Status: str
-    StatusExtended: str
-    ResourceId: str
-    CheckId: str
-    Muted: bool
-    ResourceName: str
-    Framework: str
-    Name: str
-
-
-class AzureCSAModel(BaseModel):
-    """
-    AzureCSAModel generates a finding's output in CSV CSA format for Azure.
-    """
-
-    Provider: str
-    Description: str
-    SubscriptionId: str
-    Location: str
-    AssessmentDate: str
-    Requirements_Id: str
-    Requirements_Description: str
-    Requirements_Name: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_Section: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_CCMLite: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_IaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_PaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_SaaS: str
-    Requirements_Attributes_ScopeApplicability: list[dict]
-    Status: str
-    StatusExtended: str
-    ResourceId: str
-    CheckId: str
-    Muted: bool
-    ResourceName: str
-    Framework: str
-    Name: str
@@ -79,30 +79,43 @@ def _to_snake_case(name: str) -> str:
    return s.lower()


-def _build_requirement_attrs(requirement, framework) -> dict:
-    """Build a dict with requirement attributes for the unmapped section.
+def _build_requirement_attrs(requirement, framework):
+    """Build the requirement attributes payload for the unmapped section.

-    Keys are normalized to snake_case for OCSF consistency.
-    Only includes attributes whose AttributeMetadata has output_formats.ocsf=True.
-    When no metadata is declared, all attributes are included.
+    Keys are snake_cased and filtered by ``AttributeMetadata.output_formats.ocsf``
+    when declared. MITRE-style attrs (``{"_raw_attributes": [...]}``) are
+    unwrapped into a list of per-entry dicts.
    """
-    attrs = requirement.attributes
-    if not attrs:
+    requirement_attributes = requirement.attributes
+    if not requirement_attributes:
        return {}

-    # Build set of keys allowed for OCSF output
    metadata = framework.attributes_metadata
-    if metadata:
-        ocsf_keys = {m.key for m in metadata if m.output_formats.ocsf}
-    else:
-        ocsf_keys = None  # No metadata → include all
+    allowed_keys = (
+        {entry.key for entry in metadata if entry.output_formats.ocsf}
+        if metadata
+        else None
+    )

-    result = {}
-    for key, value in attrs.items():
-        if ocsf_keys is not None and key not in ocsf_keys:
-            continue
-        result[_to_snake_case(key)] = value
-    return result
+    def _to_snake_case_dict(entry: dict) -> dict:
+        return {
+            _to_snake_case(key): value
+            for key, value in entry.items()
+            if allowed_keys is None or key in allowed_keys
+        }
+
+    if (
+        isinstance(requirement_attributes, dict)
+        and "_raw_attributes" in requirement_attributes
+    ):
+        raw_entries = requirement_attributes.get("_raw_attributes") or []
+        return [
+            _to_snake_case_dict(entry)
+            for entry in raw_entries
+            if isinstance(entry, dict)
+        ]
+
+    return _to_snake_case_dict(requirement_attributes)


 class OCSFComplianceOutput:
@@ -147,7 +160,14 @@ class OCSFComplianceOutput:
        findings: List["Finding"],
        framework: ComplianceFramework,
        compliance_name: str,
+        include_manual: bool = True,
    ) -> None:
+        """Transform findings into OCSF ComplianceFinding events.
+
+        Manual requirements are emitted only when ``include_manual=True``. The
+        caller must pass ``False`` for subsequent streaming batches so manual
+        events are not duplicated.
+        """
        # Build check -> requirements map
        check_req_map = {}
        for req in framework.requirements:
@@ -170,6 +190,9 @@ class OCSFComplianceOutput:
                    if cf:
                        self._data.append(cf)

+        if not include_manual:
+            return
+
        # Manual requirements (no checks or empty for current provider)
        for req in framework.requirements:
            checks = req.checks
@@ -198,8 +198,15 @@ class UniversalComplianceOutput:
        findings: list["Finding"],
        framework: ComplianceFramework,
        compliance_name: str,
+        include_manual: bool = True,
    ) -> None:
-        """Transform findings into universal compliance CSV rows."""
+        """Transform findings into universal compliance CSV rows.
+
+        Manual requirements (no checks or empty for current provider) are
+        emitted only when ``include_manual=True``. When the writer is reused
+        across streaming batches, the caller should pass ``False`` after the
+        first batch so manual rows are not duplicated.
+        """
        # Build check -> requirements map (filtered by provider for dict checks)
        check_req_map = {}
        for req in framework.requirements:
@@ -228,6 +235,9 @@ class UniversalComplianceOutput:
                    except Exception as e:
                        logger.debug(f"Skipping row for {req.id}: {e}")

+        if not include_manual:
+            return
+
        # Manual requirements (no checks or empty dict)
        for req in framework.requirements:
            checks = req.checks
@@ -342,6 +342,20 @@ class Finding(BaseModel):
                output_data["resource_uid"] = check_output.resource_id
                output_data["region"] = check_output.location

+            elif provider.type == "stackit":
+                output_data["auth_method"] = getattr(
+                    provider, "auth_method", "api_token"
+                )
+                output_data["account_uid"] = get_nested_attribute(
+                    provider, "identity.project_id"
+                )
+                output_data["account_name"] = get_nested_attribute(
+                    provider, "identity.project_name"
+                )
+                output_data["resource_name"] = check_output.resource_name
+                output_data["resource_uid"] = check_output.resource_id
+                output_data["region"] = check_output.location
+
            elif provider.type == "iac":
                output_data["auth_method"] = provider.auth_method
                provider_uid = getattr(provider, "provider_uid", None)
@@ -576,6 +590,8 @@ class Finding(BaseModel):
            finding.subscription = list(provider.identity.subscriptions.keys())[0]
        elif provider.type == "gcp":
            finding.project_id = list(provider.projects.keys())[0]
+        elif provider.type == "stackit":
+            finding.project_id = provider.identity.project_id
        elif provider.type == "iac":
            # For IaC, we don't have resource_line_range in the Finding model
            # It would need to be extracted from the resource metadata if needed
@@ -1076,6 +1076,73 @@ class HTML(Output):
            )
            return ""

+    @staticmethod
+    def get_stackit_assessment_summary(provider: Provider) -> str:
+        """
+        get_stackit_assessment_summary gets the HTML assessment summary for the StackIT provider
+
+        Args:
+            provider (Provider): the StackIT provider object
+
+        Returns:
+            str: HTML assessment summary for the StackIT provider
+        """
+        try:
+            project_id = getattr(provider.identity, "project_id", "unknown")
+            project_name = getattr(provider.identity, "project_name", "")
+            audited_regions = getattr(provider.identity, "audited_regions", set())
+
+            project_name_item = (
+                f"""
+                            <li class="list-group-item">
+                                <b>Project Name:</b> {project_name}
+                            </li>"""
+                if project_name
+                else ""
+            )
+
+            regions_item = (
+                f"""
+                            <li class="list-group-item">
+                                <b>Regions:</b> {", ".join(sorted(audited_regions))}
+                            </li>"""
+                if audited_regions
+                else ""
+            )
+
+            return f"""
+                <div class="col-md-2">
+                    <div class="card">
+                        <div class="card-header">
+                            StackIT Assessment Summary
+                        </div>
+                        <ul class="list-group list-group-flush">
+                            <li class="list-group-item">
+                                <b>Project ID:</b> {project_id}
+                            </li>
+                            {project_name_item}
+                            {regions_item}
+                        </ul>
+                    </div>
+                </div>
+                <div class="col-md-4">
+                    <div class="card">
+                        <div class="card-header">
+                            StackIT Credentials
+                        </div>
+                        <ul class="list-group list-group-flush">
+                            <li class="list-group-item">
+                                <b>Authentication Type:</b> Service Account Key
+                            </li>
+                        </ul>
+                    </div>
+                </div>"""
+        except Exception as error:
+            logger.error(
+                f"{error.__class__.__name__}[{error.__traceback__.tb_lineno}] -- {error}"
+            )
+            return ""
+
    @staticmethod
    def get_cloudflare_assessment_summary(provider: Provider) -> str:
        """
--- a/Show More
+++ b/Show More
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dependabot[bot]	3e60ae04d4	chore(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 4.35.4 to 4.36.0 Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.35.4 to 4.36.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/compare/68bde559dea0fdcac2102bfdf6230c5f70eb485e...7211b7c8077ea37d8641b6271f6a365a22a5fbfa) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github/codeql-action dependency-version: 4.36.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>	2026-06-03 11:57:46 +00:00
Pedro Martín	f7f8747512	feat(compliance): add DORA framework for AWS (#11131 )	2026-06-03 11:43:55 +02:00
RishiWig3	d573af911d	feat(aws): add sagemaker_models_monitor_enabled check (#11278 ) Co-authored-by: RishiWig3 <rishi.wig@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo P.Brito <hugopbrit@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo Pereira Brito <101209179+HugoPBrito@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-02 16:10:13 +01:00
Adrián Peña	cf9beb8234	feat(api): recover orphaned background tasks and make task re-runs idempotent (#11416 )	2026-06-02 14:00:17 +02:00
Davidm4r	7f67eac1bf	perf(api): avoid N+1 query loading finding resource tags (#11420 ) Co-authored-by: Pepe Fagoaga <pepe@prowler.com>	2026-06-02 13:19:21 +02:00
Pedro Martín	a652e28b4a	fix(api): clean up scan tmp output failure to avoid disk fill (#11421 ) Co-authored-by: Pepe Fagoaga <pepe@prowler.com>	2026-06-02 11:37:05 +02:00
Hugo Pereira Brito	1b17304c4a	docs(installation): add PowerShell commands for Prowler App install (#11413 )	2026-06-02 09:17:40 +01:00
Prowler Bot	c2cef99b33	chore(release): Bump versions to v5.30.0 (#11418 ) Co-authored-by: prowler-bot <179230569+prowler-bot@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-06-01 18:37:51 +02:00
Alejandro Bailo	a769e37615	fix(ui): restore scheduled scan column (#11411 )	2026-06-01 14:34:58 +02:00
Alejandro Bailo	9d2a8d9108	fix(ui): improve background glow contrast (#11409 )	2026-06-01 14:25:23 +02:00
Alejandro Bailo	e05519ff9f	fix(ui): refine scans tabs and provider launch flow (#11407 )	2026-06-01 12:34:11 +02:00
Pedro Martín	67b26072f8	docs(installation): add info about updating prowler (#11404 )	2026-06-01 11:15:07 +02:00
lydiavilchez	2222082631	fix(googleworkspace): update metadata urls to point to official documentation (#11405 )	2026-06-01 10:52:32 +02:00
Pepe Fagoaga	8b0cb4b981	chore: fix SDK changelog for v5.29 (#11392 )	2026-05-29 18:23:36 +02:00
Pepe Fagoaga	9422eff8ab	chore: changelog v5.29.0 (#11390 ) Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-05-29 17:29:52 +02:00
Br1an	e3c4368d32	fix(azure): pass authority to credentials for sovereign clouds (#10284 ) Co-authored-by: Hugo P.Brito <hugopbrit@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo Pereira Brito <101209179+HugoPBrito@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-05-29 15:17:41 +02:00
OokaToru	2a641b39c8	chore(s3): deprecate `s3_bucket_default_encryption` check (#11230 ) Co-authored-by: Hugo P.Brito <hugopbrit@gmail.com>	2026-05-29 14:41:52 +02:00
Alejandro Bailo	02b713572b	test(ui): find scheduled scan e2e row in In Progress tab (#11385 )	2026-05-29 10:55:16 +02:00
Alejandro Bailo	74251350bc	feat(ui): add new scan jobs view (#11258 )	2026-05-28 19:20:39 +02:00
Pablo Fernandez Guerra (PFE)	8f745cdbe6	chore(ui): upgrade pnpm to 11 and harden supply-chain defaults (#11225 ) Co-authored-by: Pablo F.G <pablo.fernandez@prowler.com>	2026-05-28 14:39:57 +02:00
Adrián Peña	81226cd837	perf(api): use literal scan_ids in finding-groups /latest aggregation (#11380 )	2026-05-28 13:46:15 +02:00
Johannes Engler	a2824f7166	feat(stackit): add new provider with 4 checks (#9237 ) Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Sergio Garcia <hello@mistercloudsec.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo P.Brito <hugopbrit@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo Pereira Brito <101209179+HugoPBrito@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-05-28 13:16:38 +02:00
Hugo Pereira Brito	edbbd86828	fix(openstack): move exception codes off the Alibaba Cloud range (#11382 )	2026-05-28 11:52:45 +02:00
lydiavilchez	c58dad2ca4	feat(googleworkspace): add rules service checks (#11379 ) Co-authored-by: Daniel Barranquero <danielbo2001@gmail.com>	2026-05-28 11:17:33 +02:00
lydiavilchez	b4befe3a10	feat(googleworkspace): add security service checks (#11356 ) Co-authored-by: pedrooot <pedromarting3@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo P.Brito <hugopbrit@gmail.com>	2026-05-28 10:15:10 +02:00
Alan Buscaglia	d98933c2e7	fix(ui): improve invitation error messages (#11376 )	2026-05-28 09:37:28 +02:00
Pedro Martín	03dfa3816d	docs: fix alerts/import-findings URLs and pricing note (#11378 )	2026-05-27 17:26:50 +02:00
Pablo Fernandez Guerra (PFE)	ad1261ce54	ci(docs): add markdownlint foundation (prek + CI) (#11210 ) Co-authored-by: Pablo F.G <pablo.fernandez@prowler.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-05-27 16:42:01 +02:00