fix(defender): avoid duplicated findings in check defender_domain_dkim_enabled (#8334)

prowler/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -2,6 +2,13 @@
 
 All notable changes to the **Prowler SDK** are documented in this file.
 
+## [v5.9.2] (Prowler v5.9.2) UNRELEASED
+
+### Fixed
+- Use the correct resource name in `defender_domain_dkim_enabled` check [(#8334)](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/pull/8334)
+
+---
+
 ## [v5.9.0] (Prowler v5.9.0)
 
 ### Added

prowler/providers/m365/services/defender/defender_domain_dkim_enabled/defender_domain_dkim_enabled.py

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class defender_domain_dkim_enabled(Check):
             report = CheckReportM365(
                 metadata=self.metadata(),
                 resource=config,
-                resource_name="DKIM Configuration",
+                resource_name=config.id,
                 resource_id=config.id,
             )
             report.status = "FAIL"

tests/providers/m365/services/defender/defender_domain_dkim_enabled/defender_domain_dkim_enabled_test.py

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class Test_defender_domain_dkim_enabled:
                 == "DKIM is enabled for domain with ID domain1."
             )
             assert result[0].resource == defender_client.dkim_configurations[0].dict()
-            assert result[0].resource_name == "DKIM Configuration"
+            assert result[0].resource_name == "domain1"
             assert result[0].resource_id == "domain1"
             assert result[0].location == "global"
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class Test_defender_domain_dkim_enabled:
                 == "DKIM is not enabled for domain with ID domain2."
             )
             assert result[0].resource == defender_client.dkim_configurations[0].dict()
-            assert result[0].resource_name == "DKIM Configuration"
+            assert result[0].resource_name == "domain2"
             assert result[0].resource_id == "domain2"
             assert result[0].location == "global"